Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients Aged ≤70 Years.

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2024-03-25 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.23-00072
Toshihiro Onohara, Nobuhiro Handa, Masakazu Kawasaki, Fuminori Kasashima, Tetsuya Saito, Teruya Nakamura, Dai Une, Mikizo Nakai, Suguru Shiraya, Kazuki Maeda, Katsuhiko Imai, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasushi Shimoe, Minoru Okamoto, Yoshikazu Kawazu
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients Aged ≤70 Years.","authors":"Toshihiro Onohara, Nobuhiro Handa, Masakazu Kawasaki, Fuminori Kasashima, Tetsuya Saito, Teruya Nakamura, Dai Une, Mikizo Nakai, Suguru Shiraya, Kazuki Maeda, Katsuhiko Imai, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasushi Shimoe, Minoru Okamoto, Yoshikazu Kawazu","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.23-00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) against abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in younger patients remains unknown. Hence, the current study aimed to investigate whether the aneurysm-related mortality rate of EVAR is acceptable among patients aged ≤70 years. <b>Methods:</b> Among 644 patients, 148 underwent EVAR (EVAR group), and 496 received open surgical repair (OSR group). The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events after AAA repair were evaluated using the cumulative incidence function in the presence of competing risks. <b>Results:</b> The EVAR group had higher prevalences of several comorbidities, and overall survival for the EVAR group was significantly inferior to that of the OSR group. The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events at 5 years were 1.5%, 11.7%, and 6.4% in the EVAR group and 1.3%, 5.3%, and 5.9% in the OSR group, respectively. EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. However, it was an independent poor prognostic factor of any intervention. <b>Conclusion:</b> EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. Therefore, it demonstrated acceptable procedure-related long-term outcomes, at least in high-risk young patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"17 1","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.23-00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) against abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in younger patients remains unknown. Hence, the current study aimed to investigate whether the aneurysm-related mortality rate of EVAR is acceptable among patients aged ≤70 years. Methods: Among 644 patients, 148 underwent EVAR (EVAR group), and 496 received open surgical repair (OSR group). The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events after AAA repair were evaluated using the cumulative incidence function in the presence of competing risks. Results: The EVAR group had higher prevalences of several comorbidities, and overall survival for the EVAR group was significantly inferior to that of the OSR group. The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events at 5 years were 1.5%, 11.7%, and 6.4% in the EVAR group and 1.3%, 5.3%, and 5.9% in the OSR group, respectively. EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. However, it was an independent poor prognostic factor of any intervention. Conclusion: EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. Therefore, it demonstrated acceptable procedure-related long-term outcomes, at least in high-risk young patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄≤70 岁患者血管内动脉瘤修补术的长期疗效。
目的:血管内动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)对年轻患者腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的疗效仍然未知。因此,本研究旨在调查 EVAR 的动脉瘤相关死亡率在年龄≤70 岁的患者中是否可以接受。研究方法在 644 名患者中,148 人接受了 EVAR(EVAR 组),496 人接受了开放手术修复(OSR 组)。在存在竞争风险的情况下,使用累积发生率函数评估了 AAA 修复术后动脉瘤相关死亡、任何干预和严重动脉瘤相关事件的累积发生率。结果显示EVAR组的几种合并症发病率较高,EVAR组的总生存率明显低于OSR组。EVAR组和OSR组5年内动脉瘤相关死亡、任何干预和严重动脉瘤相关事件的累积发生率分别为1.5%、11.7%和6.4%,OSR组分别为1.3%、5.3%和5.9%。EVAR不是动脉瘤相关死亡率和严重动脉瘤相关事件的重要预后因素。但是,它是任何干预措施的独立不良预后因素。结论:EVAR不是动脉瘤相关死亡率和严重动脉瘤相关事件的重要预后因素。因此,至少在高风险的年轻患者中,EVAR 的长期疗效是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A Case of Acute Aortic Occlusion Occurring in Association with COVID-19 Infection and Ulcerative Colitis. A Case of Infected Abdominal Aortic Graft with Pancreatic Fistula: Successful Treatment through a Staged Approach with Percutaneous Catheter Drainage and Partial Graft Excision. A Case of Transapical Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm with a Complicated Access Route. Collapse and Occlusion of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent in the Right Common Iliac Arteries Due to External Stress. Coronary-Pulmonary Artery Fistula Provides Collateral Flow to an Occluded Left Anterior Descending Artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1