White adoptive parents of children from China, microaggressions, and parental awareness of bias.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1037/fam0001217
Amanda L Baden, Sunanda M Sharma, Elliotte S Harrington, Ebony E White, Xian Zhang, Ellen E Pinderhughes
{"title":"White adoptive parents of children from China, microaggressions, and parental awareness of bias.","authors":"Amanda L Baden, Sunanda M Sharma, Elliotte S Harrington, Ebony E White, Xian Zhang, Ellen E Pinderhughes","doi":"10.1037/fam0001217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we explored racial microaggressions (RMAs) and adoption microaggressions (AMAs) experienced and committed by white adoptive parents of transracial adoptees. Two research questions guided this inquiry: (a) What types of RMAs and AMAs do white adoptive parents of children adopted from China experience and commit? and (b) how is white adoptive parental awareness of race and adoption related to their committing of microaggressions? Based on qualitative coding of interviews conducted with 39 white adoptive parents of Chinese adoptees, the most frequently coded AMA was <i>Biology is Best</i> for experienced AMAs and <i>Phantom Birth Parents</i> for committed AMAs. <i>Alien in Own Land</i> was the most experienced RMA, and <i>Color Evasiveness</i> was the most committed RMA. Parents tended to have high awareness of the AMAs (87%) and RMAs (89%) they experienced from others, yet this awareness did not preclude them from committing RMAs and AMAs within their transracially adoptive family. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"582-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we explored racial microaggressions (RMAs) and adoption microaggressions (AMAs) experienced and committed by white adoptive parents of transracial adoptees. Two research questions guided this inquiry: (a) What types of RMAs and AMAs do white adoptive parents of children adopted from China experience and commit? and (b) how is white adoptive parental awareness of race and adoption related to their committing of microaggressions? Based on qualitative coding of interviews conducted with 39 white adoptive parents of Chinese adoptees, the most frequently coded AMA was Biology is Best for experienced AMAs and Phantom Birth Parents for committed AMAs. Alien in Own Land was the most experienced RMA, and Color Evasiveness was the most committed RMA. Parents tended to have high awareness of the AMAs (87%) and RMAs (89%) they experienced from others, yet this awareness did not preclude them from committing RMAs and AMAs within their transracially adoptive family. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领养中国儿童的白人父母、微观偏见和父母对偏见的认识。
在本研究中,我们探讨了跨种族领养儿童的白人养父母所经历和犯下的种族微冒犯(RMAs)和领养微冒犯(AMAs)。本研究有两个问题:(a) 从中国收养儿童的白人养父母经历和实施了哪些类型的种族微观诽谤和收养微观诽谤? (b) 白人养父母对种族和收养的认识与他们实施微观诽谤有什么关系?根据对 39 位收养中国被收养儿童的白人养父母的访谈进行的定性编码,最常被编码为 "生物是最好的"(Biology is Best)的微小冒犯是有经验的微小冒犯,而 "魅影亲生父母"(Phantom Birth Parents)则是有承诺的微小冒犯。外国人在自己的土地上 "是最有经验的RMA,而 "肤色回避 "是最坚定的RMA。父母往往对他们从他人那里经历的AMA(87%)和RMA(89%)有很高的认识,但这种认识并不妨碍他们在跨种族收养家庭中实施RMA和AMA。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,版权所有。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
期刊最新文献
Reading between the lines: How sexual minority youth interpret paternal support. Caregivers' efficacy to address suicidality in their child/ren. Are there perils of partialing marital conflict behaviors? Comparisons of interpersonal correlates. Prevalence and risk factors for intimate partner violence victimization among Arab women in Israel. "I choose joy": Exploring Black familial joy as a strengths-based coping asset in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1