{"title":"Effects of Rifampicin Plus Levofloxacin or Isoniazid on Immune Function of Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis.","authors":"Feng Lv, Nan Tang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Due to the different effects of various drugs and the lack of authoritative and unified guidelines in clinical practice, the choice of therapeutic drugs for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains controversial. Rifampicin, levofloxacin, and isoniazid are all anti-TB drugs. However, no comparative studies of the treatment effects of rifampicin + levofloxacin and rifampicin + isoniazid have occurred.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study intended to analyze the therapeutic effects of rifampicin + levofloxacin compared to rifampicin + isoniazid in the treatment of pulmonary TB to provide a clinical reference, which could provide new references for future clinical treatment of the disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The research team conducted a prospective controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place at Zibo Zhoucun District People's Hospital in Zibo, China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were 100 patients with pulmonary TB admitted to the hospital between March 2021 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The research team assigned participants to one of two groups: (1) the intervention group, with 56 participants who received rifampicin + levofloxacin therapy, and (2) the control group, with 44 participants who received rifampicin + isoniazid.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The research team measured: (1) clinical efficacy, (2) incidence of adverse reactions, (3) changes in inflammatory factors, (4) changes in immunoglobulins (Igs), and (5) changes in T lymphocyte subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group's total effective rate for treatment was significantly higher than that of the control group (P = .049). However, no significant difference existed between the groups in the incidence of adverse reactions (P > .05). Postintervention, the intervention group's inflammatory factors-IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP, and β-EP-were significantly lower and its immunoglobulins (Igs) G/A/M (IgG/A/M) were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < .05). In addition, the intervention group's T lymphocyte subpopulations of CD3+ and CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ were significantly higher and CD8+ was significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05). In other words, the intervention group had a better immune function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with rifampicin + isoniazid, rifampicin + levofloxacin had a better clinical effect in the treatment of pulmonary TB and could effectively regulate patients' immune functions and inhibit inflammatory reactions. The current research team recommends that rifampicin + levofloxacin become the preferred treatment for pulmonary TB in the absence of a drug allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"90-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Due to the different effects of various drugs and the lack of authoritative and unified guidelines in clinical practice, the choice of therapeutic drugs for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains controversial. Rifampicin, levofloxacin, and isoniazid are all anti-TB drugs. However, no comparative studies of the treatment effects of rifampicin + levofloxacin and rifampicin + isoniazid have occurred.
Objective: The study intended to analyze the therapeutic effects of rifampicin + levofloxacin compared to rifampicin + isoniazid in the treatment of pulmonary TB to provide a clinical reference, which could provide new references for future clinical treatment of the disease.
Design: The research team conducted a prospective controlled study.
Setting: The study took place at Zibo Zhoucun District People's Hospital in Zibo, China.
Participants: Participants were 100 patients with pulmonary TB admitted to the hospital between March 2021 and December 2022.
Interventions: The research team assigned participants to one of two groups: (1) the intervention group, with 56 participants who received rifampicin + levofloxacin therapy, and (2) the control group, with 44 participants who received rifampicin + isoniazid.
Outcome measures: The research team measured: (1) clinical efficacy, (2) incidence of adverse reactions, (3) changes in inflammatory factors, (4) changes in immunoglobulins (Igs), and (5) changes in T lymphocyte subsets.
Results: The intervention group's total effective rate for treatment was significantly higher than that of the control group (P = .049). However, no significant difference existed between the groups in the incidence of adverse reactions (P > .05). Postintervention, the intervention group's inflammatory factors-IL-6, TNF-α, hs-CRP, and β-EP-were significantly lower and its immunoglobulins (Igs) G/A/M (IgG/A/M) were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < .05). In addition, the intervention group's T lymphocyte subpopulations of CD3+ and CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ were significantly higher and CD8+ was significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05). In other words, the intervention group had a better immune function.
Conclusions: Compared with rifampicin + isoniazid, rifampicin + levofloxacin had a better clinical effect in the treatment of pulmonary TB and could effectively regulate patients' immune functions and inhibit inflammatory reactions. The current research team recommends that rifampicin + levofloxacin become the preferred treatment for pulmonary TB in the absence of a drug allergy.
期刊介绍：
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
