[Effects of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Skills Training on Depression and Anxiety Disorders - A Pilot Study under Routine Care Conditions].

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2294-2330
Felix Wucherpfennig, Patricia Eggert
{"title":"[Effects of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Skills Training on Depression and Anxiety Disorders - A Pilot Study under Routine Care Conditions].","authors":"Felix Wucherpfennig, Patricia Eggert","doi":"10.1055/a-2294-2330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Skills training as an integral part of dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) is highly effective in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Research interest is increasingly focused on the transdiagnostic effects of the skills training on depression and anxiety disorders. The present study examined the extent to which the findings of high-quality randomized controlled studies can be transferred to everyday treatment under routine care conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N=26 patients without personality disorders were treated in a day clinic over a period of eight weeks. In the control group, 11 patients received routine care treatment and in the experimental group 15 patients additionally received weekly skills training. Symptom distress, as well as emotion regulation and mindfulness were assessed longitudinally at three time points. Multilevel analyzes were used to examine whether there was an additive effect of the skills training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group was superior to the control group in all endpoints. The effect sizes were comparable to those from experimental research. Improvements in mindfulness were significantly correlated with reductions in symptom distress.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings fit into previous research efforts and complement them with a naturalistic research perspective. The advantages and disadvantages of an experimental and naturalistic research perspective are discussed, and relevant limitations of the present study are highlighted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Skills training is an established, flexible, modular therapy program that is ideal for improving the adaptability of patients with different psychological diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2294-2330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Skills training as an integral part of dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) is highly effective in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Research interest is increasingly focused on the transdiagnostic effects of the skills training on depression and anxiety disorders. The present study examined the extent to which the findings of high-quality randomized controlled studies can be transferred to everyday treatment under routine care conditions.

Methods: N=26 patients without personality disorders were treated in a day clinic over a period of eight weeks. In the control group, 11 patients received routine care treatment and in the experimental group 15 patients additionally received weekly skills training. Symptom distress, as well as emotion regulation and mindfulness were assessed longitudinally at three time points. Multilevel analyzes were used to examine whether there was an additive effect of the skills training.

Results: The experimental group was superior to the control group in all endpoints. The effect sizes were comparable to those from experimental research. Improvements in mindfulness were significantly correlated with reductions in symptom distress.

Discussion: The findings fit into previous research efforts and complement them with a naturalistic research perspective. The advantages and disadvantages of an experimental and naturalistic research perspective are discussed, and relevant limitations of the present study are highlighted.

Conclusion: Skills training is an established, flexible, modular therapy program that is ideal for improving the adaptability of patients with different psychological diagnoses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[辩证行为疗法(DBT)技能培训对抑郁症和焦虑症的影响--常规护理条件下的试点研究]。
目的:技能训练是辩证行为疗法(DBT)的重要组成部分,对治疗边缘型人格障碍非常有效。研究兴趣越来越多地集中在技能训练对抑郁症和焦虑症的跨诊断效果上。本研究探讨了高质量随机对照研究的结果在多大程度上可应用于常规护理条件下的日常治疗:方法:26 名无人格障碍的患者在一家日间诊所接受了为期八周的治疗。在对照组中,11 名患者接受常规护理治疗;在实验组中,15 名患者每周额外接受技能培训。在三个时间点对症状困扰、情绪调节和正念进行了纵向评估。采用多层次分析法研究技能培训是否具有叠加效应:结果:实验组在所有终点上都优于对照组。结果:实验组在所有终点上都优于对照组,效果大小与实验研究结果相当。正念的改善与症状困扰的减轻显著相关:讨论:研究结果与以往的研究成果相吻合,并从自然研究的角度对其进行了补充。讨论:研究结果与之前的研究工作相吻合,并以自然研究的视角对其进行了补充,讨论了实验研究和自然研究视角的优缺点,并强调了本研究的相关局限性:技能训练是一种成熟、灵活、模块化的治疗方案,非常适合提高不同心理诊断患者的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
[Learning Evidence-Based Practice - Multi-Perspective Competence Development using the Example of Generalised Anxiety Disorder]. [Utilization of Psychosocial Support for Young Adults with Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors]. [Partnership Status And Prevalence Of Mental Disorders In Women And Men With Cancer]. [Young Adult Cancer Patients (AYA): Preferences for Outpatient Psychosocial Care and Gender-Specific Differences - Results from the AYA-LE study]. [Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1