An in vitro comparison of the dimensional stability of four 3D-printed models under various storage conditions.

Vanessa Knode, Björn Ludwig, Sinan Hamadeh, Nikolaos Pandis, Padhraig S Fleming
{"title":"An in vitro comparison of the dimensional stability of four 3D-printed models under various storage conditions.","authors":"Vanessa Knode, Björn Ludwig, Sinan Hamadeh, Nikolaos Pandis, Padhraig S Fleming","doi":"10.2319/081223-557.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the dimensional stability of various 3D-printed models derived from resin and plant-based, biodegradable plastics (PLA) under specific storage conditions for a period of up to 21 weeks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four different printing materials, including Draft V2, study model 2, and Ortho model OD01 resins as well as PLA mineral, were evaluated over a 21-week period. Eighty 3D-printed models were divided equally into two groups, with one group stored in darkness and the other exposed to daylight. All models were stored at a constant room temperature (20°C). Measurements were taken at 7-week intervals using the Inspect 3D module in OnyxCeph software (Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dimensional change was noted for all of the models with shrinkage of up to 0.26 mm over the study period. Most contraction occured from baseline to T1, although significant further contraction also arose from T1 to T2 (P < .001) and T1 to T3 (P < .001). More shrinkage was observed when exposed to daylight overall and for each resin type (P < .01). The least shrinkage was noted with Ortho model OD01 resin (0.16 mm, SD = 0.06), and the highest level of shrinkage was observed for Draft V2 resin (0.23 mm, SD = 0.06; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shrinkage of 3D-printed models is pervasive, arising regardless of the material used (PLA or resin) and being independent of the brand or storage conditions. Consequently, immediate utilization of 3D printing for orthodontic appliance purposes may be preferable, with prolonged storage risking the manufacture of inaccurate orthodontic retainers and appliances.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"94 3","pages":"346-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11050461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/081223-557.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the dimensional stability of various 3D-printed models derived from resin and plant-based, biodegradable plastics (PLA) under specific storage conditions for a period of up to 21 weeks.

Materials and methods: Four different printing materials, including Draft V2, study model 2, and Ortho model OD01 resins as well as PLA mineral, were evaluated over a 21-week period. Eighty 3D-printed models were divided equally into two groups, with one group stored in darkness and the other exposed to daylight. All models were stored at a constant room temperature (20°C). Measurements were taken at 7-week intervals using the Inspect 3D module in OnyxCeph software (Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany).

Results: Dimensional change was noted for all of the models with shrinkage of up to 0.26 mm over the study period. Most contraction occured from baseline to T1, although significant further contraction also arose from T1 to T2 (P < .001) and T1 to T3 (P < .001). More shrinkage was observed when exposed to daylight overall and for each resin type (P < .01). The least shrinkage was noted with Ortho model OD01 resin (0.16 mm, SD = 0.06), and the highest level of shrinkage was observed for Draft V2 resin (0.23 mm, SD = 0.06; P < .001).

Conclusions: Shrinkage of 3D-printed models is pervasive, arising regardless of the material used (PLA or resin) and being independent of the brand or storage conditions. Consequently, immediate utilization of 3D printing for orthodontic appliance purposes may be preferable, with prolonged storage risking the manufacture of inaccurate orthodontic retainers and appliances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外比较四种 3D 打印模型在不同储存条件下的尺寸稳定性。
目的:研究树脂和植物基可降解塑料(PLA)制成的各种三维打印模型在特定储存条件下长达 21 周的尺寸稳定性:研究由树脂和植物基生物降解塑料(PLA)制成的各种三维打印模型在特定储存条件下长达 21 周的尺寸稳定性:对四种不同的打印材料(包括 Draft V2、研究模型 2 和 Ortho 模型 OD01 树脂以及聚乳酸矿物)进行了为期 21 周的评估。80 个三维打印模型被平均分成两组,一组在黑暗中保存,另一组暴露在日光下。所有模型都存放在恒定的室温(20°C)下。使用 OnyxCeph 软件(Image Instruments GmbH,德国开姆尼茨)中的 Inspect 3D 模块每隔 7 周进行一次测量:结果:所有模型的尺寸都发生了变化,在研究期间收缩达 0.26 毫米。大部分收缩发生在基线至 T1 期,但 T1 至 T2 期(P < .001)和 T1 至 T3 期(P < .001)也出现了显著的进一步收缩。总体而言,暴露在日光下的收缩率更高,每种树脂类型的收缩率也更高(P < .01)。Ortho 模型 OD01 树脂的收缩程度最小(0.16 毫米,SD = 0.06),Draft V2 树脂的收缩程度最大(0.23 毫米,SD = 0.06;P < .001):结论:三维打印模型的收缩是普遍现象,无论使用哪种材料(聚乳酸或树脂)都会产生收缩,而且与品牌或储存条件无关。因此,最好立即将三维打印技术用于正畸矫治器的制作,而长期储存则有可能导致制作出不准确的正畸保持器和矫治器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eruptive path of maxillary canines in patients with lateral incisor agenesis: a longitudinal follow-up. Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics. Three-dimensional assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway in Down syndrome during the mixed dentition period: a case-control study. Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study. An in vitro study of a combined patient-specific device for safe and accurate insertion of infrazygomatic crest miniscrews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1