Evaluation of the Craniovertebral Angle in Standing versus Sitting Positions in Young Adults with and without Severe Forward Head Posture.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-01-01
David A Titcomb, Bridget F Melton, Helen W Bland, Theresa Miyashita
{"title":"Evaluation of the Craniovertebral Angle in Standing versus Sitting Positions in Young Adults with and without Severe Forward Head Posture.","authors":"David A Titcomb, Bridget F Melton, Helen W Bland, Theresa Miyashita","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of standing versus sitting body position on the craniovertebral angle (CVA) in young adults without pathology; and to investigate whether mean differences between positional CVA measures in subjects with severe forward head posture (FHP) are distinct from age-matched controls with normal head posture. Ninety-eight young adults (68 women, 30 men) without pathology (OVERALL; <i>n</i> = 98) volunteered for the study; those with CVA > 53° were also included in a normal posture group (NORM; <i>n</i> = 14); those with CVA < 45° were also included in a severe FHP group (SEV; <i>n</i> = 15). CVA assessments were conducted in standing and sitting. Mean difference comparison of change in mean CVA between conditions revealed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) higher CVA values in standing condition (OVERALL: 50.0 ± 5.2°; NORM: 56.6 ± 2.7°; SEV: 41.2 ± 3.2°) compared to sitting condition (OVERALL: 47.8 ± 5.7°; NORM: 55.9 ± 2.8°; SEV: 39.0 ± 4.0°). Mean difference comparison of between-group change in mean CVA between conditions revealed greater CVA change (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the SEV group (2.2 ± 2.1°) versus the NORM group (0.8 ± 1.2°). Sitting CVA values may be lower (indicating greater FHP) than standing CVA values in young adults. Differences between standing and sitting CVA measures may be greater in young adults with severe FHP compared to peers with normal head posture. Study findings support standing as a standardized body position for CVA assessment in young adults without pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"73-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of standing versus sitting body position on the craniovertebral angle (CVA) in young adults without pathology; and to investigate whether mean differences between positional CVA measures in subjects with severe forward head posture (FHP) are distinct from age-matched controls with normal head posture. Ninety-eight young adults (68 women, 30 men) without pathology (OVERALL; n = 98) volunteered for the study; those with CVA > 53° were also included in a normal posture group (NORM; n = 14); those with CVA < 45° were also included in a severe FHP group (SEV; n = 15). CVA assessments were conducted in standing and sitting. Mean difference comparison of change in mean CVA between conditions revealed significantly (p < 0.05) higher CVA values in standing condition (OVERALL: 50.0 ± 5.2°; NORM: 56.6 ± 2.7°; SEV: 41.2 ± 3.2°) compared to sitting condition (OVERALL: 47.8 ± 5.7°; NORM: 55.9 ± 2.8°; SEV: 39.0 ± 4.0°). Mean difference comparison of between-group change in mean CVA between conditions revealed greater CVA change (p < 0.05) in the SEV group (2.2 ± 2.1°) versus the NORM group (0.8 ± 1.2°). Sitting CVA values may be lower (indicating greater FHP) than standing CVA values in young adults. Differences between standing and sitting CVA measures may be greater in young adults with severe FHP compared to peers with normal head posture. Study findings support standing as a standardized body position for CVA assessment in young adults without pathology.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估有和没有严重头后仰的年轻人在站立和坐姿下的颅椎体角度。
本研究的目的是探讨站姿与坐姿对无病变青壮年颅椎体角度(CVA)的影响,并研究严重前倾头姿(FHP)受试者与头部姿势正常的年龄匹配对照组的颅椎体角度测量值之间的平均差异是否不同。98名无病态的年轻成年人(68名女性,30名男性)(OVERALL;n = 98)自愿参加了这项研究;CVA > 53°的受试者也被纳入正常姿势组(NORM;n = 14);CVA < 45°的受试者也被纳入严重FHP组(SEV;n = 15)。CVA评估在站立和坐姿下进行。对不同状态下的平均 CVA 变化进行均值比较后发现,站立状态下的 CVA 值(OVERALL:50.0 ± 5.2°;NORM:56.6 ± 2.7°;SEV:41.2 ± 3.2°)明显高于坐姿状态下的 CVA 值(OVERALL:47.8 ± 5.7°;NORM:55.9 ± 2.8°;SEV:39.0 ± 4.0°)(P < 0.05)。对不同条件下的组间平均 CVA 变化进行均差比较后发现,SEV 组(2.2 ± 2.1°)与 NORM 组(0.8 ± 1.2°)相比,CVA 变化更大(p < 0.05)。在年轻人中,坐位 CVA 值可能低于站位 CVA 值(表明 FHP 更大)。与头部姿势正常的同龄人相比,患有严重 FHP 的年轻人的站立和坐姿 CVA 测量值之间的差异可能更大。研究结果支持将站立作为评估无病变青壮年 CVA 的标准体位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1