Development and validation of machine learning models to predict the need for haemostatic therapy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-05-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745241246899
Scarlet Nazarian, Frank Po Wen Lo, Jianing Qiu, Nisha Patel, Benny Lo, Lakshmana Ayaru
{"title":"Development and validation of machine learning models to predict the need for haemostatic therapy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.","authors":"Scarlet Nazarian, Frank Po Wen Lo, Jianing Qiu, Nisha Patel, Benny Lo, Lakshmana Ayaru","doi":"10.1177/26317745241246899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This presentation however is not universally high risk as only 20-30% of bleeds require urgent haemostatic therapy. Nevertheless, the current standard of care is for all patients admitted to an inpatient bed to undergo endoscopy within 24 h for risk stratification which is invasive, costly and difficult to achieve in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop novel non-endoscopic machine learning models for AUGIB to predict the need for haemostatic therapy by endoscopic, radiological or surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed data from patients admitted with AUGIB to hospitals from 2015 to 2020 (<i>n</i> = 970). Machine learning models were internally validated to predict the need for haemostatic therapy. The performance of the models was compared to the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) using the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random forest classifier [AUROC 0.84 (0.80-0.87)] had the best performance and was superior to the GBS [AUROC 0.75 (0.72-0.78), <i>p</i> < 0.001] in predicting the need for haemostatic therapy in patients with AUGIB. A GBS cut-off of ⩾12 was associated with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.74, 0.49, 0.81, 0.41 and 0.85, respectively. The Random Forrest model performed better with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.82, 0.54, 0.90, 0.60 and 0.88, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed and validated a machine learning algorithm with high accuracy and specificity in predicting the need for haemostatic therapy in AUGIB. This could be used to risk stratify high-risk patients to urgent endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 ","pages":"26317745241246899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11071626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745241246899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This presentation however is not universally high risk as only 20-30% of bleeds require urgent haemostatic therapy. Nevertheless, the current standard of care is for all patients admitted to an inpatient bed to undergo endoscopy within 24 h for risk stratification which is invasive, costly and difficult to achieve in routine clinical practice.

Objectives: To develop novel non-endoscopic machine learning models for AUGIB to predict the need for haemostatic therapy by endoscopic, radiological or surgical intervention.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Method: We analysed data from patients admitted with AUGIB to hospitals from 2015 to 2020 (n = 970). Machine learning models were internally validated to predict the need for haemostatic therapy. The performance of the models was compared to the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) using the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

Results: The random forest classifier [AUROC 0.84 (0.80-0.87)] had the best performance and was superior to the GBS [AUROC 0.75 (0.72-0.78), p < 0.001] in predicting the need for haemostatic therapy in patients with AUGIB. A GBS cut-off of ⩾12 was associated with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.74, 0.49, 0.81, 0.41 and 0.85, respectively. The Random Forrest model performed better with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.82, 0.54, 0.90, 0.60 and 0.88, respectively.

Conclusion: We developed and validated a machine learning algorithm with high accuracy and specificity in predicting the need for haemostatic therapy in AUGIB. This could be used to risk stratify high-risk patients to urgent endoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证机器学习模型,以预测急性上消化道出血患者的止血治疗需求。
背景:急性上消化道出血(AUGIB)是发病和死亡的主要原因。但这种出血并非普遍高危,因为只有 20%-30% 的出血需要紧急止血治疗。尽管如此,目前的护理标准是所有住院病人在 24 小时内接受内窥镜检查以进行风险分层,这在常规临床实践中具有侵入性、成本高且难以实现:为 AUGIB 开发新型非内窥镜机器学习模型,以预测是否需要通过内窥镜、放射学或外科干预进行止血治疗:设计:一项回顾性队列研究:我们分析了2015年至2020年期间医院收治的AUGIB患者数据(n = 970)。对机器学习模型进行了内部验证,以预测止血治疗的需求。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)将模型的性能与格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分(GBS)进行比较:结果:随机森林分类器[AUROC 0.84 (0.80-0.87)]的性能最佳,优于格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分[AUROC 0.75 (0.72-0.78), p 结论:我们开发并验证了机器学习算法:我们开发并验证了一种机器学习算法,该算法在预测 AUGIB 患者是否需要止血治疗方面具有很高的准确性和特异性。该算法可用于对高危患者进行紧急内镜检查的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stent for transgastric drainage of loculated malignant ascites. Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided simple puncture-aspiration (non-stenting) in the management of abdominal collections. Causes of intraprocedural discomfort in colonoscopy: a review and practical tips. Retrograde colon imaging through colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing helps to confirm the cause of difficult colonoscopy: a case report. Total mesorectal excision after rectal-sparing approach in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment: a high volume center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1