Comparative efficacy of low-volume retrobulbar anesthesia using three commercial local anesthetics in adult horses.

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.2460/javma.24.02.0121
Zachary C Tooley, J Seth Eaton, Sophia M Grant-Counard, Shelby M Ilkenhans, Scott J Hetzel, Kyle J Bartholomew
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of low-volume retrobulbar anesthesia using three commercial local anesthetics in adult horses.","authors":"Zachary C Tooley, J Seth Eaton, Sophia M Grant-Counard, Shelby M Ilkenhans, Scott J Hetzel, Kyle J Bartholomew","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.02.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of low-volume (5-mL) locoregional retrobulbar anesthesia (\"retrobulbar block\") by use of 3 commercial local anesthetic formulations.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>8 healthy adult mares.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A block-randomized, masked, controlled design was used. A single ultrasound-guided retrobulbar block was performed with 2% lidocaine, 2% mepivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 5 eyes/group). Contralateral eyes served as untreated controls. End points performed at baseline and time intervals up to 24 hours postblock included the following: assessment of neurophthalmic reflexes/responses, intraocular pressure, and vertical pupil diameter measurement, corneal and periocular esthesiometry, and observation for adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-volume block did not result in increased intraocular pressure or other adverse effects at any time point in any treatment group. Statistically significant corneal anesthesia (P < .001) was observed 1 minute after block in all groups, persisting through 4 hours after lidocaine or mepivacaine block and through 24 hours after bupivacaine block. Clinically significant periocular anesthesia was not observed in any group. Significant vertical pupil diameter increase (P < .05) was observed for up to 4 hours after lidocaine or mepivacaine block and 6 hours after bupivacaine block.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Low-volume retrobulbar block with any of the 3 local anesthetic drugs evaluated was not associated with adverse effects. In terms of efficacy, mepivacaine block showed no clinical advantage over lidocaine block. However, bupivacaine block induced comparatively rapid and sustained corneal anesthesia. In comparison to published findings using a larger injection volume, low-volume retrobulbar block with lidocaine produced clinically comparable corneal anesthesia. However, periocular soft tissue anesthesia was not achieved with any local anesthetic drug at low volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.02.0121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of low-volume (5-mL) locoregional retrobulbar anesthesia ("retrobulbar block") by use of 3 commercial local anesthetic formulations.

Animals: 8 healthy adult mares.

Methods: A block-randomized, masked, controlled design was used. A single ultrasound-guided retrobulbar block was performed with 2% lidocaine, 2% mepivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 5 eyes/group). Contralateral eyes served as untreated controls. End points performed at baseline and time intervals up to 24 hours postblock included the following: assessment of neurophthalmic reflexes/responses, intraocular pressure, and vertical pupil diameter measurement, corneal and periocular esthesiometry, and observation for adverse effects.

Results: Low-volume block did not result in increased intraocular pressure or other adverse effects at any time point in any treatment group. Statistically significant corneal anesthesia (P < .001) was observed 1 minute after block in all groups, persisting through 4 hours after lidocaine or mepivacaine block and through 24 hours after bupivacaine block. Clinically significant periocular anesthesia was not observed in any group. Significant vertical pupil diameter increase (P < .05) was observed for up to 4 hours after lidocaine or mepivacaine block and 6 hours after bupivacaine block.

Clinical relevance: Low-volume retrobulbar block with any of the 3 local anesthetic drugs evaluated was not associated with adverse effects. In terms of efficacy, mepivacaine block showed no clinical advantage over lidocaine block. However, bupivacaine block induced comparatively rapid and sustained corneal anesthesia. In comparison to published findings using a larger injection volume, low-volume retrobulbar block with lidocaine produced clinically comparable corneal anesthesia. However, periocular soft tissue anesthesia was not achieved with any local anesthetic drug at low volume.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用三种商用局麻药对成年马进行低容量球后麻醉的疗效比较。
目的:比较使用 3 种商用局部麻醉剂配方进行低容量(5 毫升)局部球后麻醉("球后阻滞")的效果:比较使用 3 种商用局麻药配方进行低容量(5 毫升)局部球后麻醉("球后阻滞")的疗效:方法:采用阻滞随机、掩蔽、对照设计。使用 2% 利多卡因、2% 甲哌卡因或 0.5% 布比卡因进行单次超声引导下球后阻滞(n = 5 只眼睛/组)。对侧眼作为未经治疗的对照组。在基线和阻滞后 24 小时内进行的终点检测包括:神经眼反射/反应评估、眼压和瞳孔垂直直径测量、角膜和眼周雌激素测定以及不良反应观察:结果:在任何治疗组的任何时间点,低容量阻滞都不会导致眼压升高或其他不良反应。在所有治疗组中,阻滞后 1 分钟观察到明显的角膜麻醉(P < .001),利多卡因或甲哌卡因阻滞后持续 4 小时,布比卡因阻滞后持续 24 小时。各组均未观察到明显的眼周麻醉。利多卡因或甲哌卡因阻滞后 4 小时内,以及布比卡因阻滞后 6 小时内,均观察到瞳孔垂直直径显著增大(P < .05):临床相关性:使用所评估的 3 种局麻药中的任何一种进行低容量球后阻滞都不会产生不良反应。就疗效而言,甲哌卡因阻滞与利多卡因阻滞相比没有临床优势。不过,布比卡因阻滞可诱导相对快速和持续的角膜麻醉。与已发表的使用较大注射量的研究结果相比,使用利多卡因的低容量球后阻滞在临床上产生的角膜麻醉效果相当。然而,任何局麻药在低注射量下都无法实现眼周软组织麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
期刊最新文献
Academia must be flexible and innovative in addressing the veterinary medical educator shortage. Auburn University trains well-balanced, resilient veterinarians. I resolve … Getting involved in 2025. The AVMA journals continue to provide, promote, and advance. Utilizing simulated cases in clinical skills education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1