Exploring dietitians' views on digital nutrition educational tools in Malaysia: a qualitative study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.4162/nrp.2024.18.2.294
Zahara Abdul Manaf, Mohd Hafiz Mohd Rosli, Norhayati Mohd Noor, Nor Aini Jamil, Fatin Hanani Mazri, Suzana Shahar
{"title":"Exploring dietitians' views on digital nutrition educational tools in Malaysia: a qualitative study.","authors":"Zahara Abdul Manaf, Mohd Hafiz Mohd Rosli, Norhayati Mohd Noor, Nor Aini Jamil, Fatin Hanani Mazri, Suzana Shahar","doi":"10.4162/nrp.2024.18.2.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Dietitians frequently use nutrition education tools to facilitate dietary counselling sessions. Nevertheless, these tools may require adaptation to keep pace with technological advancements. This study had a 2-fold purpose: first, to identify the types of nutrition education tools currently in use, identify their limitations, and explore dietitians' perspectives on the importance of these tools; second, to investigate the features that dietitians prefer in digital nutrition education tools.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>A semi-structured face-to-face interview was conducted among 15 dietitians from selected public hospitals, primary care clinics, and teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Inductive thematic analysis of the responses was conducted using NVivo version 12 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most dietitians used physical education tools including the healthy plate model, pamphlets, food models, and flip charts. These tools were perceived as important as they facilitate the nutrition assessment process, deliver nutrition intervention, and are time efficient. However, dietitians described the current educational tools as impersonal, outdated, limited in availability due to financial constraints, unhandy, and difficult to visualise. Alternatively, they strongly favoured digital education tools that provided instant feedback, utilised an automated system, included a local food database, were user-friendly, developed by experts in the field, and seamlessly integrated into the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presently, although dietitians have a preference for digital educational tools, they heavily rely on physical nutrition education tools due to their availability despite the perception that these tools are outdated, impersonal, and inconvenient. Transitioning to digital dietary education tools could potentially address these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":19232,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10995771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2024.18.2.294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Dietitians frequently use nutrition education tools to facilitate dietary counselling sessions. Nevertheless, these tools may require adaptation to keep pace with technological advancements. This study had a 2-fold purpose: first, to identify the types of nutrition education tools currently in use, identify their limitations, and explore dietitians' perspectives on the importance of these tools; second, to investigate the features that dietitians prefer in digital nutrition education tools.

Subjects/methods: A semi-structured face-to-face interview was conducted among 15 dietitians from selected public hospitals, primary care clinics, and teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Inductive thematic analysis of the responses was conducted using NVivo version 12 software.

Results: Most dietitians used physical education tools including the healthy plate model, pamphlets, food models, and flip charts. These tools were perceived as important as they facilitate the nutrition assessment process, deliver nutrition intervention, and are time efficient. However, dietitians described the current educational tools as impersonal, outdated, limited in availability due to financial constraints, unhandy, and difficult to visualise. Alternatively, they strongly favoured digital education tools that provided instant feedback, utilised an automated system, included a local food database, were user-friendly, developed by experts in the field, and seamlessly integrated into the healthcare system.

Conclusion: Presently, although dietitians have a preference for digital educational tools, they heavily rely on physical nutrition education tools due to their availability despite the perception that these tools are outdated, impersonal, and inconvenient. Transitioning to digital dietary education tools could potentially address these issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨马来西亚营养师对数字营养教育工具的看法:一项定性研究。
背景/目的:营养师经常使用营养教育工具来促进膳食咨询。然而,这些工具可能需要调整以跟上技术进步的步伐。本研究有两个目的:第一,确定目前使用的营养教育工具的类型,找出其局限性,并探讨营养师对这些工具重要性的看法;第二,调查营养师更喜欢数字营养教育工具的哪些功能:对来自马来西亚部分公立医院、初级保健诊所和教学医院的 15 名营养师进行了半结构化面对面访谈。使用 NVivo 第 12 版软件对回答进行归纳式主题分析:结果:大多数营养师使用的体育教育工具包括健康餐盘模型、小册子、食物模型和挂图。这些工具被认为非常重要,因为它们有助于营养评估过程、提供营养干预措施,而且省时省力。然而,营养师们认为目前的教育工具不人性化、过时、因经济限制而供应有限、不实用、难以直观。相反,他们非常青睐能提供即时反馈、利用自动化系统、包含本地食品数据库、用户友好、由该领域专家开发并能与医疗保健系统无缝集成的数字教育工具:目前,尽管营养师更倾向于使用数字化教育工具,但他们仍严重依赖于物理营养教育工具,因为这些工具已经过时、不人性化且不方便使用。过渡到数字化饮食教育工具有可能解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research and Practice
Nutrition Research and Practice NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research and Practice (NRP) is an official journal, jointly published by the Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition since 2007. The journal had been published quarterly at the initial stage and has been published bimonthly since 2010. NRP aims to stimulate research and practice across diverse areas of human nutrition. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts on nutrition biochemistry and metabolism, community nutrition, nutrition and disease management, nutritional epidemiology, nutrition education, foodservice management in the following categories: Original Research Articles, Notes, Communications, and Reviews. Reviews will be received by the invitation of the editors only. Statements made and opinions expressed in the manuscripts published in this Journal represent the views of authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Societies.
期刊最新文献
Protective effect of Phyllostachys edulis (Carrière) J. Houz against chronic ethanol-induced cognitive impairment in vivo. Risk of all-cause mortality is associated with multiple health-related lifestyle behaviors and does not differ between urban and rural areas in Korea. Umami taste receptor suppresses cancer cachexia by regulating skeletal muscle atrophy in vivo and in vitro. Opuntia humifusa stems rich in quercetin and isorhamnetin alleviate insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed rats. A study on the consumer behavior and attitude toward low-sodium convenience store foods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1