Comparative Study on the Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Different Post-exposure Intramuscular Rabies Vaccination Regimens in China.

Yun Song, Ying He, Xue Xin Lu, Xiao Mei Zhang, Xiao Lin Jiang, Qing Song, Xue Yong Huang, Hong Xia Ma, Peng Cheng Yu, Wu Yang Zhu
{"title":"Comparative Study on the Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Different Post-exposure Intramuscular Rabies Vaccination Regimens in China.","authors":"Yun Song, Ying He, Xue Xin Lu, Xiao Mei Zhang, Xiao Lin Jiang, Qing Song, Xue Yong Huang, Hong Xia Ma, Peng Cheng Yu, Wu Yang Zhu","doi":"10.3967/bes2024.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the current Essen rabies post-exposure immunization schedule (0-3-7-14-28) in China and the simple 4-dose schedule (0-3-7-14) newly recommended by the World Health Organization in terms of their safety, efficacy, and protection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice were vaccinated according to different immunization schedules, and blood was collected for detection of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNAs) on days 14, 21, 28, 35, and 120 after the first immunization. Additionally, different groups of mice were injected with lethal doses of the CVS-11 virus on day 0, subjected to different rabies immunization schedules, and assessed for morbidity and death status. In a clinical trial, 185 rabies-exposed individuals were selected for post-exposure vaccination according to the Essen schedule, and blood was collected for RVNAs detection on days 28 and 42 after the first immunization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference in RVNAs between mice in the Essen and 0-3-7-14 schedule groups was observed on the 35th day ( <i>P</i> < 0.05). The groups 0-3-7-14, 0-3-7-21, and 0-3-7-28 showed no statistically significant difference ( <i>P</i> > 0.05) in RVNAs levels at any time point. The post-exposure immune protective test showed that the survival rate of mice in the control group was 20%, whereas that in the immunization groups was 40%. In the clinical trial, the RVNAs positive conversion rates on days 28 (14 days after 4 doses) and 42 (14 days after 5 doses) were both 100%, and no significant difference in RVNAs levels was observed ( <i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simple 4-dose schedule can produce sufficient RVNAs levels, with no significant effect of a delayed fourth vaccine dose (14-28 d) on the immunization potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the current Essen rabies post-exposure immunization schedule (0-3-7-14-28) in China and the simple 4-dose schedule (0-3-7-14) newly recommended by the World Health Organization in terms of their safety, efficacy, and protection.

Methods: Mice were vaccinated according to different immunization schedules, and blood was collected for detection of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNAs) on days 14, 21, 28, 35, and 120 after the first immunization. Additionally, different groups of mice were injected with lethal doses of the CVS-11 virus on day 0, subjected to different rabies immunization schedules, and assessed for morbidity and death status. In a clinical trial, 185 rabies-exposed individuals were selected for post-exposure vaccination according to the Essen schedule, and blood was collected for RVNAs detection on days 28 and 42 after the first immunization.

Results: A statistically significant difference in RVNAs between mice in the Essen and 0-3-7-14 schedule groups was observed on the 35th day ( P < 0.05). The groups 0-3-7-14, 0-3-7-21, and 0-3-7-28 showed no statistically significant difference ( P > 0.05) in RVNAs levels at any time point. The post-exposure immune protective test showed that the survival rate of mice in the control group was 20%, whereas that in the immunization groups was 40%. In the clinical trial, the RVNAs positive conversion rates on days 28 (14 days after 4 doses) and 42 (14 days after 5 doses) were both 100%, and no significant difference in RVNAs levels was observed ( P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The simple 4-dose schedule can produce sufficient RVNAs levels, with no significant effect of a delayed fourth vaccine dose (14-28 d) on the immunization potential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国不同暴露后肌肉注射狂犬病疫苗方案的免疫原性和有效性比较研究。
研究目的本研究旨在比较中国现行的埃森狂犬病暴露后免疫程序(0-3-7-14-28)和世界卫生组织新推荐的简易4剂程序(0-3-7-14)的安全性、有效性和保护性:方法:按照不同的免疫程序给小鼠接种疫苗,并在第一次免疫后的第 14、21、28、35 和 120 天采血检测狂犬病病毒中和抗体(RVNAs)。此外,不同组的小鼠在第 0 天注射致死剂量的 CVS-11 病毒,接受不同的狂犬病免疫程序,并评估发病和死亡状况。在一项临床试验中,根据埃森计划选择了 185 名狂犬病暴露者进行暴露后疫苗接种,并在首次免疫后第 28 天和第 42 天采集血液检测 RVNAs:第 35 天,埃森组和 0-3-7-14 组小鼠的 RVNAs 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。0-3-7-14、0-3-7-21 和 0-3-7-28 组在任何时间点的 RVNAs 水平均无明显统计学差异(P > 0.05)。暴露后免疫保护试验显示,对照组小鼠的存活率为 20%,而免疫组的存活率为 40%。在临床试验中,第 28 天(4 剂后 14 天)和第 42 天(5 剂后 14 天)的 RVNAs 阳性转化率均为 100%,且 RVNAs 水平无显著差异(P > 0.05):结论:简单的 4 剂接种程序可产生足够的 RVNAs 水平,第四剂疫苗的延迟接种(14-28 天)对免疫潜力无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Exposure of Rare Earth Elements and Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer in Beijing. ATM Activation is Key in Vasculogenic Mimicry Formation by Glioma Stem-like Cells. Changes on Stroke Burden Attributable to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter in China. Effects of Curcumin on Neuroinflammation and the Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway in Rat Brains Following Gas Explosion. Health Risk Assessment of Employees Exposed to Chlorination By-products of Recreational Water in Large Amusement Parks in Shanghai.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1