Impact of Pharmacist Transitions of Care on 30-Day Readmissions Within a Primary Care-Based Accountable Care Organization.

Q2 Medicine Senior Care Pharmacist Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2024.178
Tina Benny, Kajal Jain, Genevieve Marie Hale, Rucha Acharya, Cynthia Moreau, Elaina Rosario, Alexandra Perez
{"title":"Impact of Pharmacist Transitions of Care on 30-Day Readmissions Within a Primary Care-Based Accountable Care Organization.","authors":"Tina Benny, Kajal Jain, Genevieve Marie Hale, Rucha Acharya, Cynthia Moreau, Elaina Rosario, Alexandra Perez","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies in the ambulatory care setting have shown inconsistent results in regard to, or with respect to pharmacist telephonic transitions of care (TOC) encounters and reduction in 30-day readmission rates. No studies that have been completed within an accountable care organization (ACO) evaluating the impact of telephonic TOC encounters performed by a pharmacist have been identified. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of clinical pharmacy telephonic TOC encounters on readmission rates within a primary care-based ACO. In this retrospective chart review, data for those who had a pharmacist telephonic TOC encounter and those who had an attempt were collected. The primary outcome of this study was all-cause 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate for targeted disease states, time to readmission, and readmission reason the same as previous discharge reason. For subjects who received a telephonic TOC encounter, pharmacist intervention type and provider acceptance of intervention(s) were described. For the final analysis, 154 encounters were included, 83 encounters in the telephonic TOC encounter group, and 71 did not receive a telephonic TOC encounter. The 30-day readmission rates were similar among those who received a telephonic TOC encounter and those who did not: the difference was not significant (15.7% vs. 28.2%; <i>P</i> = 0.059). There was also no statistical difference in the secondary outcomes. Even so, the results of this study suggest that performing a pharmacist telephonic TOC encounter in a primary care-based ACO setting has the potential to reduce 30-day readmission rates and further research appears to be warranted in this important area of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 5","pages":"178-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies in the ambulatory care setting have shown inconsistent results in regard to, or with respect to pharmacist telephonic transitions of care (TOC) encounters and reduction in 30-day readmission rates. No studies that have been completed within an accountable care organization (ACO) evaluating the impact of telephonic TOC encounters performed by a pharmacist have been identified. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of clinical pharmacy telephonic TOC encounters on readmission rates within a primary care-based ACO. In this retrospective chart review, data for those who had a pharmacist telephonic TOC encounter and those who had an attempt were collected. The primary outcome of this study was all-cause 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate for targeted disease states, time to readmission, and readmission reason the same as previous discharge reason. For subjects who received a telephonic TOC encounter, pharmacist intervention type and provider acceptance of intervention(s) were described. For the final analysis, 154 encounters were included, 83 encounters in the telephonic TOC encounter group, and 71 did not receive a telephonic TOC encounter. The 30-day readmission rates were similar among those who received a telephonic TOC encounter and those who did not: the difference was not significant (15.7% vs. 28.2%; P = 0.059). There was also no statistical difference in the secondary outcomes. Even so, the results of this study suggest that performing a pharmacist telephonic TOC encounter in a primary care-based ACO setting has the potential to reduce 30-day readmission rates and further research appears to be warranted in this important area of practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师转诊对基于基础医疗的责任医疗组织内 30 天再入院治疗的影响。
之前在非住院医疗环境中进行的研究显示,药剂师远程医疗转换 (TOC) 会诊和降低 30 天再入院率的结果并不一致。目前尚未发现在责任医疗组织 (ACO) 中完成的评估药剂师远程 TOC 会诊影响的研究。本研究的目的是分析临床药剂师远程 TOC 会诊对以初级保健为基础的 ACO 内再入院率的影响。在这项回顾性病历审查中,收集了接受过药剂师远程 TOC 会诊的患者和未接受过药剂师远程 TOC 会诊的患者的数据。本研究的主要结果是全因 30 天再入院率。次要结果包括目标疾病的 30 天再入院率、再入院时间以及与之前出院原因相同的再入院原因。对于接受电话 TOC 会诊的受试者,描述了药剂师干预类型和医疗服务提供者对干预的接受程度。在最终分析中,共纳入了 154 例病例,其中 83 例属于远程 TOC 会诊组,71 例未接受远程 TOC 会诊。接受远程 TOC 会诊的患者与未接受远程 TOC 会诊的患者的 30 天再入院率相似:差异不显著(15.7% 对 28.2%;P = 0.059)。次要结果也没有统计学差异。尽管如此,本研究的结果表明,在以初级保健为基础的 ACO 环境中进行药剂师远程 TOC 会诊有可能降低 30 天再入院率,似乎有必要在这一重要实践领域开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Co-designing Medication Optimization Patient-Centered Outcomes Research With Older People and Caregivers as Research Partners. Heart Failure Part 3: Diuretic Management in Older People. How Should the Scope of Pharmacy Practice Be Decided? Marsha Meyer PRESIDENT 2024-2025. Notes on the Consultant Pharmacist Practice Model: At Home and Abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1