Senior Care Pharmacist最新文献

Background: Older people with diabetes are at high risk for hypoglycemia. Implementing a hypoglycemia treatment protocol in long-term care (LTC) settings may positively affect patient-related outcomes and health care resource utilization and costs. Anecdotal experience indicates little has been studied and published regarding this clinical practice. Objective: To identify hypoglycemia treatment protocols established for LTC settings and assess their effects on patient-related outcomes and health care resource use. Data Sources: The authors performed a systematic literature search of English-language articles and abstracts published between January 1, 2003 (PubMed), or 2018 (Google Scholar) and May 10, 2023. Search terms were "hypoglycemia," "diabetes mellitus," "longterm care," "nursing facilities," "assisted living facilities," "geriatrics," "elderly," "aged," "disabled," "disease management," "evidence-based medicine," "clinical protocols," "guideline," "glucagon," and/or "blood glucose." Included were publications with hypoglycemia treatment and management protocols or hypoglycemia-specific recommendations for LTC settings. DATA SYNTHESIS: The authors identified 405 articles and abstracts, removed 36 duplicates, screened 369 titles/ abstracts, and analyzed the full text for 93. Five met the inclusion criteria. Two originated from the American Diabetes Association: 2016 position statement regarding the management of diabetes in LTC and skilled nursing facilities, and 2023 standard-of-care guideline for managing older people with diabetes. One included the results after implementing an overall diabetes clinical care management algorithm in LTC facilities. A 2020 abstract and 2019 article were the only 2 publications involving specific hypoglycemia treatment protocols in LTC settings. Conclusion: This systematic literature search identified lack of published hypoglycemia treatment protocols in LTC settings and their effects on patient outcomes.

This report addresses evidence for efficacy of diabetes medications with a focus on stroke risk reduction. The cardiovascular benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists have been well-established; however, clinical trials to date have examined composite cardiovascular endpoints that include, but do not specifically focus on, stroke. The purpose of this case review is to examine the evidence for the various diabetes medications in reducing the risk for stroke. This literature review was inspired by a patient seen in a geriatric day hospital program with diabetes and a history of multiple strokes. Our goal was to select a diabetes management regimen that would provide both glycemic control and stroke risk reduction. As diabetes and cerebrovascular disease commonly coexist and are important contributors to morbidity and mortality in older individuals, appropriate management must incorporate both current evidence as well as consideration for patient-specific factors that may influence the treatment plan. This patient case illustrates the importance of both.

Objective: The objective is to evaluate the impact of consultant pharmacist-directed anticoagulation management in the post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) setting. Design: Retrospective study. Participants: Patients whose clinical details were included in the ASCP aggregate data and were older than 65 years of age, admitted to PALTC facility, and had active anticoagulant therapy were included in the study. Interventions: Pharmacists enrolled in the ASCP (Quality Improvement Project) and performed monthly chart reviews per standard practice. The 30-day post-chart review follow-up data were entered into the ASCP data collection. The research team assessed for consultant pharmacist interventions associated with anticoagulant therapy management. Results: Data were collected from November 2022 through March 2023, during which 807 charts were assessed. Within the charts reviewed, 274 patients received anticoagulation therapy, of which 173 (63%) were identified as having a medication-related problem concerning anticoagulant use. Two hundred sixteen pharmacist recommendations were sent to providers to address the inappropriate anticoagulant therapy. Providers completed modifications to 190 (88%) of the recommendations. Conclusion: This study emphasized pharmacist involvement in managing anticoagulant therapy within the PALTC setting and identified the need for further investigation of patient specific outcomes.

Heart failure is a common cardiovascular disease that affects older people and has a high rate of mortality. Treatment for heart failure has evolved in the past 10 years to include novel evidence-based agents as well as changes in how medications are initiated and up-titrated. Despite evidence of the importance of using four guideline-directed medications, older people are often undertreated with these lifesaving therapies. Senior care pharmacists play an important role in heart failure management among older people by providing therapeutic recommendations; monitoring therapeutic interventions; and educating patients, caregivers, and/ or providers.

Background The Southern Arizona VA Health Care System (SAVAHCS) implemented a delirium prevention and treatment protocol in 2019. Objective The primary objective of this study was to determine if the implementation of a delirium protocol influenced deliriogenic medication use in hospitalized geriatric veterans. The secondary objectives were to compare the rates of delirium diagnosis, hospital length-of-stay, and rates of newly started deliriogenic medications during admission pre- and post-protocol. Methods This study was a retrospective, secondary data analysis study. Veterans 65 years of age and older who were admitted to an inpatient medical ward at the SAVAHCS for 24 hours or more between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 (pre-protocol) or January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021 (post-protocol) were included. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal upon admission. Results A total of 5491 patients were included in this study; 2940 (53.5%) in the pre-protocol group and 2551 (46.5%) in the post-protocol group. Patients received at least one deliriogenic medication during their admission in the post-protocol group (36.2%) compared with the pre-protocol group (34.1%), but there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.098). There were also no significant differences in the rates of documentation of delirium as a diagnosis at discharge, hospital length-of-stay, or the rates of newly started deliriogenic medications during admission between the groups. Conclusion Implementation of a delirium prevention and treatment protocol at the SAVAHCS did not significantly impact the use of deliriogenic medications in hospitalized geriatric veterans.