[Chinese expert consensus on the watch and wait strategy in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment (2024 version)].

{"title":"[Chinese expert consensus on the watch and wait strategy in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment (2024 version)].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240227-00075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, domestic and foreign data have demonstrated that the watch and wait strategy has good safety and efficacy for patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. Watch and wait strategy and local resection in selective patients can achieve organ preservation and improve the quality of life. Since the release of the Expert Consensus on Watch and Wait Strategy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer (2020 version), it has attracted widespread attention from medical professionals and patients in the field of rectal cancer treatment. In recent years, the proportion of cCR after neoadjuvant therapy has further increased, and the relevant data of observation strategy has gradually accumulated. However, there are still different opinions on issues such as outcome parameters, risks and benefits, eligible population, re-evaluation criteria and timing, follow-up and salvage methods, and strategies to improve efficacy. Though it can be explained by the various viewpoints, experiences, and evidences, it objectively hinders the development of watch and wait strategy. Therefore, the Chinese Watch and Wait Database Research Collaboration Group (CWWD), together with Chinese Society of Colorectal Surgery, Chinese Medical Association; Colorectal Cancer Physician Specialty Committee, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Colorectal Cancer Committee, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Colorectal Surgeon Working Group, Medical Doctor Association and relevant experts has updated consensus into the 2024 version. This consensus lists the key issues in the practice of watch and wait for rectal cancer, marks the level of evidence and expert opinions through literature review and expert opinion, and exposes the unresolved problems to provide thoughts and solutions for future work in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240227-00075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, domestic and foreign data have demonstrated that the watch and wait strategy has good safety and efficacy for patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. Watch and wait strategy and local resection in selective patients can achieve organ preservation and improve the quality of life. Since the release of the Expert Consensus on Watch and Wait Strategy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer (2020 version), it has attracted widespread attention from medical professionals and patients in the field of rectal cancer treatment. In recent years, the proportion of cCR after neoadjuvant therapy has further increased, and the relevant data of observation strategy has gradually accumulated. However, there are still different opinions on issues such as outcome parameters, risks and benefits, eligible population, re-evaluation criteria and timing, follow-up and salvage methods, and strategies to improve efficacy. Though it can be explained by the various viewpoints, experiences, and evidences, it objectively hinders the development of watch and wait strategy. Therefore, the Chinese Watch and Wait Database Research Collaboration Group (CWWD), together with Chinese Society of Colorectal Surgery, Chinese Medical Association; Colorectal Cancer Physician Specialty Committee, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Colorectal Cancer Committee, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Colorectal Surgeon Working Group, Medical Doctor Association and relevant experts has updated consensus into the 2024 version. This consensus lists the key issues in the practice of watch and wait for rectal cancer, marks the level of evidence and expert opinions through literature review and expert opinion, and exposes the unresolved problems to provide thoughts and solutions for future work in this area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关于直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后观察和等待策略的中国专家共识(2024 年版)]。
近年来,国内外数据表明,对于新辅助治疗后获得临床完全反应(cCR)的患者,观察和等待策略具有良好的安全性和有效性。观察与等待策略和选择性患者的局部切除可以实现器官的保留,提高患者的生活质量。自《直肠癌新辅助治疗后观察和等待策略专家共识(2020 年版)》发布以来,引起了直肠癌治疗领域医学专家和患者的广泛关注。近年来,新辅助治疗后 cCR 的比例进一步增加,观察策略的相关数据也逐渐积累。然而,在疗效参数、风险与获益、适用人群、再评价标准与时机、随访与挽救方法、提高疗效的策略等问题上仍存在不同意见。虽然可以用各种观点、经验和证据来解释,但客观上阻碍了观察和等待策略的发展。为此,中国观察与等待数据库研究协作组(CWWD)联合中华医学会结直肠外科学分会、中国医师协会结直肠癌医师专业委员会、中国抗癌协会结直肠癌专业委员会、中国医师协会结直肠外科医生工作组及相关专家,将共识更新为2024年版。该共识列出了直肠癌观察和等待实践中的关键问题,通过文献回顾和专家意见,标注了证据水平和专家意见,并暴露了尚未解决的问题,为今后该领域的工作提供了思路和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[A preliminary exploration of reduced port laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with right-sided overlap and single-flap valvuloplasty (ROSF)]. [Application of anterior esophageal wall full layer fixation and gastric tube guidance in total laparoscopic overlap method for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy]. [Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2024 edition)]. [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of brain metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer]. [Efficacy and feasibility of tunnel esophagogastrostomy to perform proximal gastrectomy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1