Barriers to Accessing Paid Parental Leave Among Birthing Parents With Perinatal Health Complications: A Multiple-Methods Study

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.02.002
{"title":"Barriers to Accessing Paid Parental Leave Among Birthing Parents With Perinatal Health Complications: A Multiple-Methods Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Even in the small number of U.S. states with paid parental leave (PPL) programs, studies have found awareness of PPL remains low and unevenly distributed among parents. Moreover, little is known about whether parents with perinatal health complications have unmet needs in obtaining information about and support for accessing parental leave during that time. This study aims to address this research gap. Given the strong evidence linking paid leave with improvements in maternal and infant health, it is critical to evaluate access among vulnerable populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We used a multiple methods approach, including a subset of the 2016–2017 Bay Area Parental Leave Survey of Mothers (analytic sample = 1,007) and interview data from mothers who stayed at a neonatal intensive care unit in 2019 (</span><em>n</em><span><span><span> = 7). All participants resided at that time in California, a state that offers PPL. The independent variable for the survey analysis was a composite measure of perinatal complications, quantified as binary with a value of 1 if respondents reported experiencing any of the four complications: poor maternal </span>mental health<span> during or after pregnancy, premature birth, or poor infant health. </span></span>Dependent variables<span> for the survey analysis measured lack of support or information for accessing PPL. We used linear probability models to assess the relationship between perinatal complications<span> and PPL support. Thematic analysis was conducted with the interview data to understand how perinatal complications shape the process of accessing PPL.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Survey results revealed that parents with perinatal complications had a lower understanding of PPL benefits and low overall support for accessing leave, including from employers, compared with parents without perinatal complications. From interviews, we learned that perinatal complications present unique challenges to parents navigating PPL. There were multiple entities involved in managing leave and providing information, such as the benefits coordinator and employers. Supervisors were reported as providers of critical emotional and financial support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Taken together, the findings from surveys and interviews suggest that health care and human resources personnel should be better equipped to provide information and support, particularly to those who experience perinatal complications and might struggle to complete paperwork while facing health challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724000197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Even in the small number of U.S. states with paid parental leave (PPL) programs, studies have found awareness of PPL remains low and unevenly distributed among parents. Moreover, little is known about whether parents with perinatal health complications have unmet needs in obtaining information about and support for accessing parental leave during that time. This study aims to address this research gap. Given the strong evidence linking paid leave with improvements in maternal and infant health, it is critical to evaluate access among vulnerable populations.

Methods

We used a multiple methods approach, including a subset of the 2016–2017 Bay Area Parental Leave Survey of Mothers (analytic sample = 1,007) and interview data from mothers who stayed at a neonatal intensive care unit in 2019 (n = 7). All participants resided at that time in California, a state that offers PPL. The independent variable for the survey analysis was a composite measure of perinatal complications, quantified as binary with a value of 1 if respondents reported experiencing any of the four complications: poor maternal mental health during or after pregnancy, premature birth, or poor infant health. Dependent variables for the survey analysis measured lack of support or information for accessing PPL. We used linear probability models to assess the relationship between perinatal complications and PPL support. Thematic analysis was conducted with the interview data to understand how perinatal complications shape the process of accessing PPL.

Results

Survey results revealed that parents with perinatal complications had a lower understanding of PPL benefits and low overall support for accessing leave, including from employers, compared with parents without perinatal complications. From interviews, we learned that perinatal complications present unique challenges to parents navigating PPL. There were multiple entities involved in managing leave and providing information, such as the benefits coordinator and employers. Supervisors were reported as providers of critical emotional and financial support.

Conclusions

Taken together, the findings from surveys and interviews suggest that health care and human resources personnel should be better equipped to provide information and support, particularly to those who experience perinatal complications and might struggle to complete paperwork while facing health challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期健康并发症的分娩父母获得带薪育儿假的障碍:多重方法研究。
导言:即使在美国少数几个有带薪育儿假(PPL)计划的州,研究也发现父母对带薪育儿假的认知度仍然很低,而且分布不均。此外,人们对患有围产期健康并发症的父母在获得育儿假信息和支持方面是否存在未满足的需求知之甚少。本研究旨在填补这一研究空白。鉴于有确凿证据表明带薪休假与改善母婴健康息息相关,因此评估弱势群体获得带薪休假的情况至关重要:我们采用了多种方法,包括 2016-2017 年湾区母亲育儿假调查的子集(分析样本 = 1,007),以及对 2019 年入住新生儿重症监护室的母亲(n = 7)的访谈数据。所有参与者当时都居住在提供 PPL 的加利福尼亚州。调查分析的自变量是围产期并发症的综合衡量指标,如果受访者报告经历了以下四种并发症中的任何一种,则量化为二进制,值为 1:孕期或产后产妇精神健康状况差、早产或婴儿健康状况差。调查分析的因变量衡量了在获得 PPL 方面缺乏支持或信息的情况。我们使用线性概率模型来评估围产期并发症与 PPL 支持之间的关系。我们还对访谈数据进行了主题分析,以了解围产期并发症是如何影响获得《公共保健计划》的过程的:调查结果显示,与没有围产期并发症的父母相比,有围产期并发症的父母对 PPL 福利的了解较少,对获得假期的总体支持也较低,包括来自雇主的支持。从访谈中我们了解到,围产期并发症给父母们驾驭 PPL 带来了独特的挑战。有多个实体参与管理假期和提供信息,如福利协调员和雇主。据报告,主管提供了重要的情感和经济支持:综合来看,调查和访谈的结果表明,医疗保健和人力资源人员应更好地提供信息和支持,尤其是为那些经历围产期并发症、在面临健康挑战时可能难以完成文书工作的人提供信息和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Experience of Pain and Pain Management for Pregnant and Postpartum Veterans With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Hair and Health Among African American Women: Historical and Sociocultural Considerations for Physical Activity and Mental Health. Contents Editorial Board Barriers and Facilitators of Extended Use of the Contraceptive Implant: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1