Assessing antibacterial efficacy of a polyhexanide hydrogel versus alginate-based wound dressing in burns.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2024.33.5.335
Ignace De Decker, Dries Janssens, Kimberly De Mey, Henk Hoeksema, Marie Simaey, Petra De Coninck, Jozef Verbelen, Alina De Pessemier, Phillip Blondeel, Stan Monstrey, Karel Ey Claes
{"title":"Assessing antibacterial efficacy of a polyhexanide hydrogel versus alginate-based wound dressing in burns.","authors":"Ignace De Decker, Dries Janssens, Kimberly De Mey, Henk Hoeksema, Marie Simaey, Petra De Coninck, Jozef Verbelen, Alina De Pessemier, Phillip Blondeel, Stan Monstrey, Karel Ey Claes","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.33.5.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Burn injuries pose a heightened risk of infection, which is primarily responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Factors such as extensive skin damage and compromised immunity exacerbate this vulnerability. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> are frequently identified in burns, with Gram-negative <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> often resistant to antibacterial agents. While Flaminal, an alginate-based wound dressing (Flen Health, Belgium), aids wound healing, its antibacterial effects are limited compared with 1% silver sulfadiazine (1% SSD). In contrast, Prontosan Wound Gel X, a betaine and polyhexanide-based hydrogel (B. Braun Medical AG, Switzerland), has been shown to effectively combat various microbes and promotes wound healing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this study, two research cohorts were retrospectively established (control group: patients receiving standard of care with the alginate-based wound dressing; intervention group: patients receiving the polyhexanide hydrogel wound dressing), comprising patients admitted to a burn centre between 2019 and 2022. Patients were eligible when continuous wound treatment with either of the two wound dressings was performed. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) scans were conducted. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected based on LDI scans and divided into healing time categories. Wound swabs were collected and the presence of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was documented. Bacterial load was evaluated using a semiquantitative scale. Wound healing was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group consisted of 31 patients with 93 ROIs, while the intervention group had 67 ROIs involving 29 patients. Both groups exhibited similar proportions of healing time categories (p>0.05). The polyhexanide hydrogel dressing outperformed the alginate-based dressing in antiseptic efficacy by significantly reducing the incidence of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>- and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>-positive cultures in patients' wounds. Wound healing time for conservative treatment was comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the polyhexanide hydrogel dressing minimised <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> colonisation in burn wounds, demonstrating strong antibacterial properties, emphasising its potential to minimise infections in burn injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.33.5.335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Burn injuries pose a heightened risk of infection, which is primarily responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Factors such as extensive skin damage and compromised immunity exacerbate this vulnerability. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are frequently identified in burns, with Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa often resistant to antibacterial agents. While Flaminal, an alginate-based wound dressing (Flen Health, Belgium), aids wound healing, its antibacterial effects are limited compared with 1% silver sulfadiazine (1% SSD). In contrast, Prontosan Wound Gel X, a betaine and polyhexanide-based hydrogel (B. Braun Medical AG, Switzerland), has been shown to effectively combat various microbes and promotes wound healing.

Method: In this study, two research cohorts were retrospectively established (control group: patients receiving standard of care with the alginate-based wound dressing; intervention group: patients receiving the polyhexanide hydrogel wound dressing), comprising patients admitted to a burn centre between 2019 and 2022. Patients were eligible when continuous wound treatment with either of the two wound dressings was performed. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) scans were conducted. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected based on LDI scans and divided into healing time categories. Wound swabs were collected and the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus was documented. Bacterial load was evaluated using a semiquantitative scale. Wound healing was recorded.

Results: The control group consisted of 31 patients with 93 ROIs, while the intervention group had 67 ROIs involving 29 patients. Both groups exhibited similar proportions of healing time categories (p>0.05). The polyhexanide hydrogel dressing outperformed the alginate-based dressing in antiseptic efficacy by significantly reducing the incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa- and Staphylococcus aureus-positive cultures in patients' wounds. Wound healing time for conservative treatment was comparable between groups.

Conclusion: In this study, the polyhexanide hydrogel dressing minimised Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus colonisation in burn wounds, demonstrating strong antibacterial properties, emphasising its potential to minimise infections in burn injuries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估聚己内酯水凝胶与海藻酸盐伤口敷料在烧伤中的抗菌效果。
目的:烧伤增加了感染风险,是导致发病率和死亡率上升的主要原因。大面积皮肤损伤和免疫力下降等因素加剧了这种脆弱性。烧伤中经常会发现铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,其中革兰氏阴性铜绿假单胞菌通常对抗菌药具有抗药性。藻酸盐伤口敷料 Flaminal(比利时 Flen Health 公司)有助于伤口愈合,但与 1%磺胺嘧啶银(1% SSD)相比,其抗菌效果有限。相比之下,Prontosan Wound Gel X(一种基于甜菜碱和聚己胺的水凝胶)(B. Braun Medical AG,瑞士)已被证明能有效对抗各种微生物并促进伤口愈合:本研究回顾性地建立了两个研究队列(对照组:接受藻酸盐伤口敷料标准护理的患者;干预组:接受聚己内酯水凝胶伤口敷料的患者),包括 2019 年至 2022 年期间在烧伤中心住院的患者。使用两种伤口敷料中的任何一种进行持续伤口治疗的患者均符合条件。进行了激光多普勒成像(LDI)扫描。根据 LDI 扫描结果选择感兴趣区(ROI),并将其划分为愈合时间类别。收集伤口拭子,记录铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的存在情况。细菌量采用半定量法进行评估。记录伤口愈合情况:对照组有 31 名患者,93 个 ROI;干预组有 29 名患者,67 个 ROI。两组的愈合时间类别比例相似(P>0.05)。聚己内酯水凝胶敷料的防腐效果优于藻酸盐敷料,能显著降低患者伤口中铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌培养阳性的发生率。两组保守治疗的伤口愈合时间相当:在这项研究中,聚己内酯水凝胶敷料最大程度地减少了烧伤伤口中铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的定植,显示出很强的抗菌特性,强调了其最大程度减少烧伤感染的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
期刊最新文献
Using patient-reported experiences to inform the use of foam dressings for hard-to-heal wounds: perspectives from a wound care expert panel. Wound healing after surgical therapy for multiple myeloma: a case-control study. A dedicated wound care module for third-year baccalaureate nurses: does it increase their knowledge and confidence? A new portable negative pressure wound therapy device: a prospective study investigating clinical outcomes. Biofilms and antibacterial sutures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1