Optimization of forensic identification through 3-dimensional imaging analysis of labial tooth surface using open-source software.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-22 DOI:10.5624/isd.20230218
Arofi Kurniawan, Aspalilah Alias, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof, Anand Marya
{"title":"Optimization of forensic identification through 3-dimensional imaging analysis of labial tooth surface using open-source software.","authors":"Arofi Kurniawan, Aspalilah Alias, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof, Anand Marya","doi":"10.5624/isd.20230218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the minimum number of teeth in the anterior dental arch that would yield accurate results for individual identification in forensic contexts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involved the analysis of 28 sets of 3-dimensional (3D) point cloud data, focused on the labial surface of the anterior teeth. These datasets were superimposed within each group in both genuine and imposter pairs. Group A incorporated data from the right to the left central incisor, group B from the right to the left lateral incisor, and group C from the right to the left canine. A comprehensive analysis was conducted, including the evaluation of root mean square error (RMSE) values and the distances resulting from the superimposition of dental arch segments. All analyses were conducted using CloudCompare version 2.12.4 (Telecom ParisTech and R&D, Kyiv, Ukraine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distances between genuine pairs in groups A, B, and C displayed an average range of 0.153 to 0.184 mm. In contrast, distances for imposter pairs ranged from 0.338 to 0.522 mm. RMSE values for genuine pairs showed an average range of 0.166 to 0.177, whereas those for imposter pairs ranged from 0.424 to 0.638. A statistically significant difference was observed between the distances of genuine and imposter pairs (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exceptional performance observed for the labial surfaces of anterior teeth underscores their potential as a dependable criterion for accurate 3D dental identification. This was achieved by assessing a minimum of 4 teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"54 1","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20230218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the minimum number of teeth in the anterior dental arch that would yield accurate results for individual identification in forensic contexts.

Materials and methods: The study involved the analysis of 28 sets of 3-dimensional (3D) point cloud data, focused on the labial surface of the anterior teeth. These datasets were superimposed within each group in both genuine and imposter pairs. Group A incorporated data from the right to the left central incisor, group B from the right to the left lateral incisor, and group C from the right to the left canine. A comprehensive analysis was conducted, including the evaluation of root mean square error (RMSE) values and the distances resulting from the superimposition of dental arch segments. All analyses were conducted using CloudCompare version 2.12.4 (Telecom ParisTech and R&D, Kyiv, Ukraine).

Results: The distances between genuine pairs in groups A, B, and C displayed an average range of 0.153 to 0.184 mm. In contrast, distances for imposter pairs ranged from 0.338 to 0.522 mm. RMSE values for genuine pairs showed an average range of 0.166 to 0.177, whereas those for imposter pairs ranged from 0.424 to 0.638. A statistically significant difference was observed between the distances of genuine and imposter pairs (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The exceptional performance observed for the labial surfaces of anterior teeth underscores their potential as a dependable criterion for accurate 3D dental identification. This was achieved by assessing a minimum of 4 teeth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用开源软件对唇齿表面进行三维成像分析,优化法医鉴定。
目的:本研究的目的是确定前牙弓中牙齿的最少数量,以便在法医鉴定中得出准确的个体识别结果:研究涉及 28 组三维(3D)点云数据的分析,重点是前牙的唇面。这些数据集叠加在每组的真牙和假牙中。A 组包含从右侧到左侧中切牙的数据,B 组包含从右侧到左侧侧切牙的数据,C 组包含从右侧到左侧犬齿的数据。我们进行了全面的分析,包括评估均方根误差(RMSE)值和牙弓片段叠加产生的距离。所有分析均使用 CloudCompare 2.12.4 版(Telecom ParisTech and R&D,乌克兰基辅)进行:结果:A、B 和 C 组中真牙对之间的距离平均为 0.153 至 0.184 毫米。相比之下,冒名顶替者之间的距离为 0.338 至 0.522 毫米。真实配对的 RMSE 值平均范围为 0.166 至 0.177,而冒名顶替者配对的 RMSE 值范围为 0.424 至 0.638。在统计意义上,真假发音对的距离存在明显差异(PC 结论:在前牙唇面观察到的优异性能突出表明,它们有潜力成为准确 3D 牙齿识别的可靠标准。通过评估至少 4 颗牙齿实现了这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Analysis of root number and canal morphology of maxillary premolars using cone-beam computed tomography. Artificial intelligence application in endodontics: A narrative review. Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on cone-beam computed tomography scans of titanium and zirconia implants within and outside the field of view. Expression of beam hardening artifacts on horizontally stitched cone-beam computed tomography images. Fractal analysis of jawbone structure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1