[Investigations of a controlled, decision tree based procedure for Selective Dry Cow Treatment in Bavarian dairy farms].

IF 0.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1055/a-2272-3195
Tanja Sonnewald-Daum, Katharina Euchner, Laetitia Frost, Tim Pauly, Carla Fuchs, Bianca Zettler, Rebekka Schade, Reglindis Huber-Schlenstedt, Jan Harms, André Klima, Rolf Mansfeld
{"title":"[Investigations of a controlled, decision tree based procedure for Selective Dry Cow Treatment in Bavarian dairy farms].","authors":"Tanja Sonnewald-Daum, Katharina Euchner, Laetitia Frost, Tim Pauly, Carla Fuchs, Bianca Zettler, Rebekka Schade, Reglindis Huber-Schlenstedt, Jan Harms, André Klima, Rolf Mansfeld","doi":"10.1055/a-2272-3195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Four parameters of a decision tree for Selective Dry Cow Treatment (SDCT), examined in a previous study, were analyzed regarding their efficacy in detecting cows for dry cow treatment (DCT, use of intramammary antimicrobials). This study set out to review wether all parameters (somatic cell count [SCC≥ 200 000 SC/ml 3 months' milk yield recordings prior dry off (DO)], clinical mastitis history during lactation [≥1 CM], culturing [14d prior DO, detection of major pathogens] and California-Mastitis-Test [CMT, > rate 1/+ at DO]) are necessary for accurate decision making, whether there are possible alternatives to replace culturing, and whether a simplified model could replace the decision tree.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Records of 18 Bavarian dairy farms from June 2015 to August 2017 were processed. Data analysis was carried out by means of descriptive statistics, as well as employing a binary cost sensitive classification tree and logit-models. For statistical analyses the outcomes of the full 4-parameter decision tree were taken as ground truth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>848 drying off procedures in 739 dairy cows (C<sub>DO</sub>) were included. SCC and CMT selected 88.1%, in combination with CM 95.6% of the cows that received DCT (n=494). Without culturing, 22 (4.4%) with major pathogens (8x <i>Staphylococcus</i> [<i>S.</i>] <i>aureus</i>) infected C<sub>DO</sub> would have been misclassified as not needing DCT. The average of geometric mean SCC (within 100 d prior DO) for C<sub>DO</sub> with negative results in culturing was<100 000 SC/ml milk, 100 000-150 000 SC/ml for C<sub>DO</sub> infected with minor pathogens, and ≥ 150 000 SC/ml for C<sub>DO</sub> infected with major pathogens (excluding <i>S.aureus</i>). Using SCC during lactation (at least 1x > 200 000 SC/ml) and positive CMT to select C<sub>DO</sub> for DCT, contrary to the decision tree, 37 C<sub>DO</sub> (4.4%) would have been treated \"incorrectly without\" and 43 C<sub>DO</sub> (5.1%) \"unnecessarily with\" DCT. Modifications were identified, such as SCC<131 000 SC/ml within 100 d prior to DO for detecting C<sub>DO</sub> with no growth or minor pathogens in culturing. The best model for grading C<sub>DO</sub> for or against DCT (C<sub>DO</sub> without CM and SCC<200 000 SC/ml [last 3 months prior DO]) had metrics of AUC=0.74, Accuracy=0.778, balanced Accuracy=0.63, Sensitivity=0.92 and Specificity=0.33.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining the decision tree's parameters SCC, CMT and CM renders suitable selection criteria under the conditions of this study. When omitting culturing, lower thresholds for SCC should be considered for each farm individually to select C<sub>DO</sub> for DCT. Nonetheless, the most accurate model could not replace the full decision tree.</p>","PeriodicalId":23115,"journal":{"name":"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2272-3195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Four parameters of a decision tree for Selective Dry Cow Treatment (SDCT), examined in a previous study, were analyzed regarding their efficacy in detecting cows for dry cow treatment (DCT, use of intramammary antimicrobials). This study set out to review wether all parameters (somatic cell count [SCC≥ 200 000 SC/ml 3 months' milk yield recordings prior dry off (DO)], clinical mastitis history during lactation [≥1 CM], culturing [14d prior DO, detection of major pathogens] and California-Mastitis-Test [CMT, > rate 1/+ at DO]) are necessary for accurate decision making, whether there are possible alternatives to replace culturing, and whether a simplified model could replace the decision tree.

Material and methods: Records of 18 Bavarian dairy farms from June 2015 to August 2017 were processed. Data analysis was carried out by means of descriptive statistics, as well as employing a binary cost sensitive classification tree and logit-models. For statistical analyses the outcomes of the full 4-parameter decision tree were taken as ground truth.

Results: 848 drying off procedures in 739 dairy cows (CDO) were included. SCC and CMT selected 88.1%, in combination with CM 95.6% of the cows that received DCT (n=494). Without culturing, 22 (4.4%) with major pathogens (8x Staphylococcus [S.] aureus) infected CDO would have been misclassified as not needing DCT. The average of geometric mean SCC (within 100 d prior DO) for CDO with negative results in culturing was<100 000 SC/ml milk, 100 000-150 000 SC/ml for CDO infected with minor pathogens, and ≥ 150 000 SC/ml for CDO infected with major pathogens (excluding S.aureus). Using SCC during lactation (at least 1x > 200 000 SC/ml) and positive CMT to select CDO for DCT, contrary to the decision tree, 37 CDO (4.4%) would have been treated "incorrectly without" and 43 CDO (5.1%) "unnecessarily with" DCT. Modifications were identified, such as SCC<131 000 SC/ml within 100 d prior to DO for detecting CDO with no growth or minor pathogens in culturing. The best model for grading CDO for or against DCT (CDO without CM and SCC<200 000 SC/ml [last 3 months prior DO]) had metrics of AUC=0.74, Accuracy=0.778, balanced Accuracy=0.63, Sensitivity=0.92 and Specificity=0.33.

Conclusions: Combining the decision tree's parameters SCC, CMT and CM renders suitable selection criteria under the conditions of this study. When omitting culturing, lower thresholds for SCC should be considered for each farm individually to select CDO for DCT. Nonetheless, the most accurate model could not replace the full decision tree.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[巴伐利亚奶牛场干奶牛选择性处理的决策树控制程序研究]。
研究目的分析了选择性干奶牛治疗(SDCT)决策树的四个参数,这些参数在检测奶牛是否需要进行干奶牛治疗(DCT,使用乳房内抗菌药)方面的效果。本研究旨在审查所有参数(体细胞数[SCC≥ 200 000 SC/ml 3个月的产奶量记录,干奶前(DO)]、泌乳期临床乳腺炎病史[≥1 CM]、培养[干奶前14天,主要病原体检测]和加利福尼亚乳腺炎测试[CMT,干奶时>率1/+])是否是准确决策的必要条件,是否有可能替代培养,以及简化模型是否能替代决策树:处理了 2015 年 6 月至 2017 年 8 月期间巴伐利亚州 18 个奶牛场的记录。数据分析通过描述性统计以及二元成本敏感分类树和 logit 模型进行。在进行统计分析时,将完整的 4 参数决策树的结果作为基本事实:结果:共纳入了 739 头奶牛(CDO)的 848 次干燥程序。SCC和CMT选择了88.1%的奶牛(n=494),结合CM选择了95.6%的奶牛(n=494)。如果不进行培养,22 头(4.4%)感染了主要病原体(8 倍金黄色葡萄球菌)的 CDO 会被误判为不需要 DCT。培养结果为阴性的 CDO 的几何平均 SCC(DO 前 100 d 内)平均值为感染轻微病原体的 CDO,而感染主要病原体(不包括金黄色葡萄球菌)的 CDO 的几何平均 SCC ≥ 150 000 SC/ml。与决策树相反,使用哺乳期 SCC(至少 1 次 > 200 000 SC/ml)和 CMT 阳性来选择 CDO 进行 DCT 治疗,37 例 CDO(4.4%)会 "不正确地 "接受 DCT 治疗,43 例 CDO(5.1%)会 "不必要地 "接受 DCT 治疗。确定了一些修改,如在培养中没有生长或病原体较少的 SCCDO。对 CDO 进行分级的最佳模型是 DCT(不含 CM 和 SCCC 的 CDO):在本研究的条件下,将决策树的参数 SCC、CMT 和 CM 结合起来,可得出合适的选择标准。在省略培养时,每个猪场都应考虑降低 SCC 的阈值,以选择 CDO 或 DCT。尽管如此,最准确的模型并不能取代完整的决策树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Die Tierärztliche Praxis wendet sich mit ihren beiden Reihen als einzige veterinärmedizinische Fachzeitschrift explizit an den Großtier- bzw. Kleintierpraktiker und garantiert damit eine zielgruppengenaue Ansprache. Für den Spezialisten bietet sie Original- oder Übersichtsartikel zu neuen Therapie- und Operationsverfahren oder den Einsatz moderner bildgebender Verfahren. Der weniger spezialisierte Tierarzt oder Berufseinsteiger findet auf seinen Berufsalltag zugeschnittene praxisbezogene Beiträge in der Fortbildungsrubrik „Aus Studium und Praxis“. Mit dem hervorgehobenen „Fazit für die Praxis“ am Ende jedes Artikels verschafft sich auch der eilige Leser einen raschen Überblick über die wichtigsten Inhalte dieser modern konzipierten Fachzeitschrift mit den vielen hochwertigen, überwiegend farbigen Abbildungen. In jedem Heft ermöglicht ein ATF-anerkannter Fortbildungsartikel den Erwerb einer ATF-Stunde (Akademie für tierärztliche Fortbildung).
期刊最新文献
[An application for mobile devices as a decision support for the treatment and prevention of bovine fasciolosis - A survey among organic dairy farms in Bavaria]. [Association between perinatal mortality and the management of cows before and at calving in large dairy herds]. [Research priorities and quality of scientific literature on dystocia in cows from 1960-2020]. How reliable is your diagnosis? In vitro capsule or biofilm formation of Streptococcus uberis and bacteriological cure of bovine mastitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1