The Quantification of Muscle Activation During the Loaded Carry Movement Pattern.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-04-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Samuel H Ellestad, Thomas P Holcomb, Alexis M Swiergol, Michael E Holmstrup, Jeremy R Dicus
{"title":"The Quantification of Muscle Activation During the Loaded Carry Movement Pattern.","authors":"Samuel H Ellestad, Thomas P Holcomb, Alexis M Swiergol, Michael E Holmstrup, Jeremy R Dicus","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 'loaded carry' is a popular resistance training activity that activates core musculature across multiple movement planes while the body is in locomotion. 'Hold' exercises are similar to carry exercises but lack the locomotive aspect. Both carry and hold exercises can be completed bilaterally (farmer's carry (FC) and hold (FH)) or unilaterally (suitcase carry (SC) and hold (SH)). A deeper understanding of muscle activation between the FC and SC and intensity-matched FH and SH might improve their application. Healthy, college-aged individuals were recruited and surface electromyography of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), longissimus (LT), and multifidus (MF) was measured bilaterally using standard procedures. Participants completed time- and intensity-matched randomized sets of the plank, FC, SC, FH, and SH separated by 5-minute rests. A one-way ANOVA was utilized to compare exercises. The FC/FH load averaged 50.7±1.9 kg, where it was used across equally weighted dumbbells. The FC elicited higher activation bilaterally in the LT, MF, RA, and EO, compared to the FH. The SC/SH single-dumbbell load averaged 25.3±0.95 kg. There was greater activation bilaterally in the LT and MF during the SC compared to the SH. However, on the ipsilateral side of the SC, the RA and EO displayed greater activation compared to the SH, but this was not different on the contralateral side. The FC and SC were characterized by increased core muscle activation bilaterally, with the SC exhibiting unique additions to ipsilateral muscle activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"480-490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 'loaded carry' is a popular resistance training activity that activates core musculature across multiple movement planes while the body is in locomotion. 'Hold' exercises are similar to carry exercises but lack the locomotive aspect. Both carry and hold exercises can be completed bilaterally (farmer's carry (FC) and hold (FH)) or unilaterally (suitcase carry (SC) and hold (SH)). A deeper understanding of muscle activation between the FC and SC and intensity-matched FH and SH might improve their application. Healthy, college-aged individuals were recruited and surface electromyography of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), longissimus (LT), and multifidus (MF) was measured bilaterally using standard procedures. Participants completed time- and intensity-matched randomized sets of the plank, FC, SC, FH, and SH separated by 5-minute rests. A one-way ANOVA was utilized to compare exercises. The FC/FH load averaged 50.7±1.9 kg, where it was used across equally weighted dumbbells. The FC elicited higher activation bilaterally in the LT, MF, RA, and EO, compared to the FH. The SC/SH single-dumbbell load averaged 25.3±0.95 kg. There was greater activation bilaterally in the LT and MF during the SC compared to the SH. However, on the ipsilateral side of the SC, the RA and EO displayed greater activation compared to the SH, but this was not different on the contralateral side. The FC and SC were characterized by increased core muscle activation bilaterally, with the SC exhibiting unique additions to ipsilateral muscle activation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负重搬运运动模式中肌肉激活的定量分析
负重背负 "是一种流行的阻力训练活动,它能在身体运动时通过多个运动平面激活核心肌肉。保持 "练习与负重练习类似,但缺乏运动方面的训练。背负和保持练习均可双侧完成(农夫背负(FC)和保持(FH))或单侧完成(手提箱背负(SC)和保持(SH))。更深入地了解 FC 和 SC 与强度相匹配的 FH 和 SH 之间的肌肉激活情况,可能会提高它们的应用效果。我们招募了健康的大学生,并采用标准程序测量了双侧腹直肌(RA)、腹外斜肌(EO)、长肌(LT)和多裂肌(MF)的表面肌电图。参与者随机完成时间和强度相匹配的平板、FC、SC、FH 和 SH 组,每组之间休息 5 分钟。采用单因素方差分析对练习进行比较。FC/FH负荷平均为50.7±1.9千克,采用的是等重哑铃。与 FH 相比,FC 在双侧 LT、MF、RA 和 EO 中引起了更高的激活。SC/SH 单哑铃平均负重为 25.3±0.95 kg。与 SH 相比,SC 期间 LT 和 MF 双侧的激活程度更高。然而,与SH相比,在SC的同侧,RA和EO显示出更大的激活,但这在对侧没有差异。FC 和 SC 的特点是双侧核心肌肉激活增加,SC 显示出同侧肌肉激活的独特增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1