Revolutionizing developmental neurotoxicity testing - a journey from animal models to advanced in vitro systems.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-06 DOI:10.14573/altex.2403281
Lena Smirnova, Helena T Hogberg, Marcel Leist, Thomas Hartung
{"title":"Revolutionizing developmental neurotoxicity testing - a journey from animal models to advanced in vitro systems.","authors":"Lena Smirnova, Helena T Hogberg, Marcel Leist, Thomas Hartung","doi":"10.14573/altex.2403281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing has seen enormous progress over the last two decades. Preceding even the publication of the animal-based OECD test guideline for DNT testing in 2007, a series of non-animal technology workshops and conferences that started in 2005 has shaped a community that has delivered a comprehensive battery of in vitro test methods (DNT IVB). Its data interpretation is now covered by a very recent OECD guidance (No. 377). Here, we overview the progress in the field, focusing on the evolution of testing strategies, the role of emerging technol­ogies, and the impact of OECD test guidelines on DNT testing. In particular, this is an example of the targeted development of an animal-free testing approach for one of the most complex hazards of chemicals to human health. These developments started literally from a blank slate, with no proposed alternative methods available. Over two decades, cutting-edge science enabled the design of a testing approach that spares animals and enables throughput to address this challenging hazard. While it is evident that the field needs guidance and regulation, the massive economic impact of decreased human cognitive capacity caused by chemical exposure should be prioritized more highly. Beyond this, the claim to fame of DNT in vitro testing is the enormous scientific progress it has brought for understanding the human brain, its development, and how it can be perturbed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":"41 2","pages":"152-178"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2403281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing has seen enormous progress over the last two decades. Preceding even the publication of the animal-based OECD test guideline for DNT testing in 2007, a series of non-animal technology workshops and conferences that started in 2005 has shaped a community that has delivered a comprehensive battery of in vitro test methods (DNT IVB). Its data interpretation is now covered by a very recent OECD guidance (No. 377). Here, we overview the progress in the field, focusing on the evolution of testing strategies, the role of emerging technol­ogies, and the impact of OECD test guidelines on DNT testing. In particular, this is an example of the targeted development of an animal-free testing approach for one of the most complex hazards of chemicals to human health. These developments started literally from a blank slate, with no proposed alternative methods available. Over two decades, cutting-edge science enabled the design of a testing approach that spares animals and enables throughput to address this challenging hazard. While it is evident that the field needs guidance and regulation, the massive economic impact of decreased human cognitive capacity caused by chemical exposure should be prioritized more highly. Beyond this, the claim to fame of DNT in vitro testing is the enormous scientific progress it has brought for understanding the human brain, its development, and how it can be perturbed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
革命性的发育神经毒性测试--从动物模型到先进体外系统的历程。
过去二十年来,发育神经毒性(DNT)测试取得了巨大进步。甚至在 2007 年发布经合组织(OECD)基于动物的 DNT 测试指南之前,一系列非动物技术研讨会和会议(始于 2005 年)就已经形成了一个群体,提供了一整套体外测试方法(IVB)。经合组织(OECD)最新发布的测试指南(第 377 号)涵盖了对其数据的解释。在此,我们将概述该领域的进展情况,重点关注测试策略的演变、新兴技术的作用以及经合组织测试指南对 DNT 测试的影响。尤其是,这是针对危害人类健康最复杂的化学品之一,有针对性地开发无动物试验方法的一个实例。这些开发工作实际上是从一片空白开始的,当时没有提出任何替代方法。二十多年来,前沿科学使我们能够设计出一种测试方法,既能避免使用动物,又能对这一具有挑战性的危害进行测试。虽然该领域显然需要指导和监管,但化学品暴露导致人类认知能力下降所造成的巨大经济影响应得到更高的重视。除此以外,DNT 体外测试的名声在于它为了解人类大脑、大脑发育及其如何受到干扰带来了巨大的科学进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
期刊最新文献
Systematic analysis of read-across adaptations in testing proposal evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency. Impact of gut permeability on estimation of oral bioavailability for chemicals in commerce and the environment. Software tools for systematic review literature screening and data extraction: Qualitative user experiences from succinct formal tests. The Virtual Human Platform for Safety Assessment (VHP4Safety) project: Next generation chemical safety assessment based on human data. Characterization of the C17.2 cell line as testing system for endocrine disruption-induced developmental neurotoxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1