Development and validation of a job aid: Tool to reduce infections in home-based stroke.

Violet K Chikanya, Sindiwe James
{"title":"Development and validation of a job aid: Tool to reduce infections in home-based stroke.","authors":"Violet K Chikanya, Sindiwe James","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Stroke patients who are discharged from hospital because of limited access to rehabilitation facilities are cared for by lay caregivers who at times have limited knowledge of infection prevention and control (IPC). User-friendly educational interventions can help bridge this knowledge gap and enhance safe care of these persons.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> To describe the development and validation of educational interventions for home-based stroke patients. The validation process enhanced the reliability and validity of the job aid resulting in standardised quality patient care of stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Mutasa district, Manicaland province, Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The systematic six steps in quality intervention development guided the development of the job aid. Graphic designers assisted with development of diagrams and annotations. A purposively selected eight-member panel of IPC expert reviewers was invited to validate the job aid using a standardised validation tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The panel agreed that the job aid's title, target group and media of instruction were adequately explained, and the background could be easily understood during practice. The content was approved with some modifications on the description of instructions to caregivers. Seven reviewers agreed that the materials used ensured understandability, acceptability, practicability and usability of the educational interventions by caregivers, and one reviewer was neutral in commenting effectiveness of the job aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The developed job aid addressed knowledge barriers in IPC for caregivers, and the reviewers confirmed that the developed job aid was adequate for effective use by lay home-based caregivers.Contribution: Utilisation of this intervention standardises patient care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Stroke patients who are discharged from hospital because of limited access to rehabilitation facilities are cared for by lay caregivers who at times have limited knowledge of infection prevention and control (IPC). User-friendly educational interventions can help bridge this knowledge gap and enhance safe care of these persons.

Aim:  To describe the development and validation of educational interventions for home-based stroke patients. The validation process enhanced the reliability and validity of the job aid resulting in standardised quality patient care of stroke patients.

Setting:  Mutasa district, Manicaland province, Zimbabwe.

Methods:  The systematic six steps in quality intervention development guided the development of the job aid. Graphic designers assisted with development of diagrams and annotations. A purposively selected eight-member panel of IPC expert reviewers was invited to validate the job aid using a standardised validation tool.

Results:  The panel agreed that the job aid's title, target group and media of instruction were adequately explained, and the background could be easily understood during practice. The content was approved with some modifications on the description of instructions to caregivers. Seven reviewers agreed that the materials used ensured understandability, acceptability, practicability and usability of the educational interventions by caregivers, and one reviewer was neutral in commenting effectiveness of the job aid.

Conclusion:  The developed job aid addressed knowledge barriers in IPC for caregivers, and the reviewers confirmed that the developed job aid was adequate for effective use by lay home-based caregivers.Contribution: Utilisation of this intervention standardises patient care practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证工作辅助工具:减少居家卒中感染的工具。
背景: 因康复设施有限而出院的脑卒中患者由非专业护理人员照顾,他们有时对感染预防和控制(IPC)的知识了解有限。用户友好型教育干预措施有助于弥补这一知识差距,加强对这些人的安全护理。目的:介绍针对居家中风患者的教育干预措施的开发和验证。验证过程提高了工作辅助工具的可靠性和有效性,从而为中风患者提供标准化的优质护理: 津巴布韦马尼卡兰省穆塔萨地区: 方法:质量干预开发的六个系统步骤指导了工作辅助工具的开发。平面设计师协助制作图表和注释。我们邀请了一个有针对性地选出的由 IPC 专家组成的八人评审小组,使用标准化的验证工具对工作辅助工具进行验证: 结果:专家小组一致认为,作业指导书的标题、目标群体和教学媒体都得到了充分说明,在实践过程中也很容易理解其背景。在对护理人员的说明进行了一些修改后,内容获得了批准。七位评审员一致认为,所使用的材料确保了教育干预措施的可理解性、可接受性、实用性和护理人员的可用性,一位评审员对作业指导书的有效性持中立态度: 结论:开发的工作辅助工具解决了护理人员在 IPC 方面的知识障碍,评审员确认开发的工作辅助工具足以供非专业家庭护理人员有效使用:贡献:这项干预措施的使用规范了患者护理操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Home visits for preterm/low birthweight infants in South Africa: Qualitative evidence synthesis. Next steps for the East, Central and Southern Africa College of Family Physicians (ECSA-CFP). Prevalence and correlates of common mental disorders in people living with HIV in primary health care facilities in Ekurhuleni district. Perceptions of roles of community healthcare workers in early childhood in Limpopo, South Africa. Body composition estimates from bioelectrical impedance and its association with cardiovascular risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1