Efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration with dexmedetomidine versus tramadol in comparison to placebo for pain control and sedation after tonsillectomy in pediatric patients: A randomized clinical trial.

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_507_21
Hesameddin Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Faezeh Naghavi
{"title":"Efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration with dexmedetomidine versus tramadol in comparison to placebo for pain control and sedation after tonsillectomy in pediatric patients: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Hesameddin Modir, Esmail Moshiri, Faezeh Naghavi","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_507_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aimed to assess the efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration with dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus tramadol-ropivacaine for pain control and sedation after tonsillectomy in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind clinical trial recruited 99 eligible children (4-8 years old) undergoing tonsillectomy and assigned to three block-randomized groups, receiving dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine (group A), tramadol-ropivacaine (group B), or placebo-ropivacaine (group C). The vital signs included blood pressure, heart rate, and SaO<sub>2</sub> before anesthesia induction, during surgery at regular intervals until 24 h after surgery. The duration of surgery and recovery, complications, and analgesic consumption were recorded and pain scores were measured by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Oucher scales as well as sedation scores by the Wilson sedation scale. Data were analyzed within SPSS 20 at a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest pain scores were measured by the CHEOPS scale in the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Statistically significant difference was observed in the CHEOPS pain score between the first two groups at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h after surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.01). The differences were revealed in the Oucher pain assessments among all groups from the time of recovery to four postoperative hours (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with the lowest in the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine group whose sedation score was greater during recovery and 5 min after surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Subjects in tramadol group had six cases of dizziness and nausea, while no side effects were observed in two other groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Only seven participants receiving dexmedetomidine required acetaminophen, but 29 in the tramadol group and all in the placebo group demanded to receive acetaminophen (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors concluded that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine has better performance in local infiltration for intra- and post-tonsillectomy analgesia and postoperative sedation, without any special side effects (like the placebo group), and that it hence is recommended to be used for local infiltration during tonsillectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_507_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article aimed to assess the efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration with dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus tramadol-ropivacaine for pain control and sedation after tonsillectomy in pediatric patients.

Materials and methods: This double-blind clinical trial recruited 99 eligible children (4-8 years old) undergoing tonsillectomy and assigned to three block-randomized groups, receiving dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine (group A), tramadol-ropivacaine (group B), or placebo-ropivacaine (group C). The vital signs included blood pressure, heart rate, and SaO2 before anesthesia induction, during surgery at regular intervals until 24 h after surgery. The duration of surgery and recovery, complications, and analgesic consumption were recorded and pain scores were measured by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Oucher scales as well as sedation scores by the Wilson sedation scale. Data were analyzed within SPSS 20 at a significance level of 0.05.

Results: The lowest pain scores were measured by the CHEOPS scale in the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine group (P < 0.05). Statistically significant difference was observed in the CHEOPS pain score between the first two groups at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h after surgery (P < 0.01). The differences were revealed in the Oucher pain assessments among all groups from the time of recovery to four postoperative hours (P < 0.05), with the lowest in the dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine group whose sedation score was greater during recovery and 5 min after surgery (P < 0.05). Subjects in tramadol group had six cases of dizziness and nausea, while no side effects were observed in two other groups (P < 0.05). Only seven participants receiving dexmedetomidine required acetaminophen, but 29 in the tramadol group and all in the placebo group demanded to receive acetaminophen (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: The authors concluded that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine has better performance in local infiltration for intra- and post-tonsillectomy analgesia and postoperative sedation, without any special side effects (like the placebo group), and that it hence is recommended to be used for local infiltration during tonsillectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定与曲马多在小儿扁桃体切除术后的疼痛控制和镇静方面的疗效对比:随机临床试验。
目的本文旨在评估小儿扁桃体切除术后使用右美托咪定-阿哌卡因与曲马多-阿哌卡因进行扁桃体周围浸润以控制疼痛和镇静的疗效:这项双盲临床试验招募了99名符合条件的扁桃体切除术患儿(4-8岁),并将其随机分配到三个阻滞组,分别接受右美托咪定-阿哌卡因(A组)、曲马多-阿哌卡因(B组)或安慰剂-阿哌卡因(C组)。生命体征包括麻醉诱导前、术中和术后 24 小时内的血压、心率和 SaO2。记录手术持续时间、恢复情况、并发症和镇痛药用量,并采用东安大略省儿童医院疼痛量表(CHEOPS)和Oucher量表测量疼痛评分,以及威尔逊镇静量表测量镇静评分。数据用 SPSS 20 进行分析,显著性水平为 0.05:右美托咪定-阿哌卡因组的 CHEOPS 评分最低(P < 0.05)。前两组在术后 30 分钟、1 小时、2 小时和 4 小时的 CHEOPS 疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。所有组别在术后恢复期至术后4小时的Oucher疼痛评估中均存在差异(P < 0.05),其中右美托咪定-阿哌卡因组的镇静评分最低,该组在术后恢复期和术后5分钟的镇静评分更高(P < 0.05)。曲马多组的受试者有6例出现头晕和恶心,而其他两组受试者均未出现副作用(P < 0.05)。只有7名接受右美托咪定治疗的患者需要服用对乙酰氨基酚,但曲马多组的29名患者和安慰剂组的所有患者都要求服用对乙酰氨基酚(P = 0.001):作者认为,右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因的辅助用药,在扁桃体切除术中和术后的局部浸润镇痛和术后镇静方面具有更好的效果,而且没有任何特殊的副作用(与安慰剂组一样),因此建议在扁桃体切除术中使用右美托咪定进行局部浸润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns and characteristics of maxillofacial trauma among children and adolescents: A Bi-institutional retrospective study. Presence of antilingula and its relationship to mandibular foramen-An anatomical study. Primary non-radiation induced angiosarcoma of the parotid with epithelioid morphology. Radiation effects in head and neck and role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: An adjunct to management. The surgical outcome of sutureless skin closures using Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond™) versus Steri-Strip™.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1