Development of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure Tool for Ambulatory Patients With Acute Unexpected Needs: The APEX Questionnaire.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-04-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241229373
Myriam Nadeau, Dominique Chabot, Mylaine Breton, Jason R Guertin, Laurie Harvey Labbé, Danièle Roberge, Gabrielle Lefebvre, Myriam Mallet, Sandrine Beaulieu, Éric Kavanagh, Nathalie Cloutier, Philippe Garant, Lynda Bélanger, Samuel Vaillancourt, Tarek Boumenna, Kathryn Bareil, Joanie Savard, David Simonyan, Mahukpe Narcisse Ulrich Singbo, Simon Berthelot
{"title":"Development of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure Tool for Ambulatory Patients With Acute Unexpected Needs: The APEX Questionnaire.","authors":"Myriam Nadeau, Dominique Chabot, Mylaine Breton, Jason R Guertin, Laurie Harvey Labbé, Danièle Roberge, Gabrielle Lefebvre, Myriam Mallet, Sandrine Beaulieu, Éric Kavanagh, Nathalie Cloutier, Philippe Garant, Lynda Bélanger, Samuel Vaillancourt, Tarek Boumenna, Kathryn Bareil, Joanie Savard, David Simonyan, Mahukpe Narcisse Ulrich Singbo, Simon Berthelot","doi":"10.1177/23743735241229373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for comparing the experience of care received by ambulatory patients with acute unexpected needs presenting in emergency departments (EDs), walk-in clinics, and primary care practices. <b>Methods:</b> The Ambulatory Patient EXperience (APEX) questionnaire was developed using a 5-phase mixed-methods approach. The questionnaire was pretested by asking potential users to rate its clarity, usefulness, redundancy, content and face validities, and discrimination on a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree). The pre-final version was then tested in a pilot study. <b>Results:</b> The final questionnaire is composed of 61 questions divided into 7 sections. In the pretest (n = 25), median responses were 8 and above for all dimensions assessed. In the pilot study, 63 participants were enrolled. Adjusted results show that access, cleanliness, and feeling treated with respect and dignity by nurses and physicians were significantly better in the clinics than in the ED. <b>Conclusion:</b> We developed a questionnaire to assess and compare experience of ambulatory care in different clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241229373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241229373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for comparing the experience of care received by ambulatory patients with acute unexpected needs presenting in emergency departments (EDs), walk-in clinics, and primary care practices. Methods: The Ambulatory Patient EXperience (APEX) questionnaire was developed using a 5-phase mixed-methods approach. The questionnaire was pretested by asking potential users to rate its clarity, usefulness, redundancy, content and face validities, and discrimination on a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree). The pre-final version was then tested in a pilot study. Results: The final questionnaire is composed of 61 questions divided into 7 sections. In the pretest (n = 25), median responses were 8 and above for all dimensions assessed. In the pilot study, 63 participants were enrolled. Adjusted results show that access, cleanliness, and feeling treated with respect and dignity by nurses and physicians were significantly better in the clinics than in the ED. Conclusion: We developed a questionnaire to assess and compare experience of ambulatory care in different clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为有紧急意外需求的门诊病人开发病人体验报告测量工具:APEX 问卷。
研究背景本研究旨在开发一种患者报告的体验测量方法(PREM),用于比较在急诊科(ED)、无预约门诊和初级保健诊所就诊的有紧急突发需求的非住院病人所获得的护理体验。方法:门诊病人体验(APEX)问卷采用五阶段混合方法开发。通过让潜在用户对问卷的清晰度、实用性、冗余性、内容和表面有效性以及区分度进行9分制评分(1分=非常不同意,9分=非常同意),对问卷进行了预测试。然后在试点研究中对最终版本进行了测试。结果:最终问卷由 61 个问题组成,分为 7 个部分。在预试(n = 25)中,所有评估维度的回答中位数均在 8 及以上。在试点研究中,有 63 人参加。调整后的结果显示,诊所的就医环境、清洁度以及受到护士和医生尊重的感觉明显优于急诊室。结论:我们编制了一份调查问卷,用于评估和比较不同临床环境下的非住院护理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Patient Experiences with Patient-Centered and Inclusive Care in Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Clinics. "It was not normal, and I had to find a doctor and tell him." Kenyan Women's Response to Cervical Cancer Symptoms. Factors Associated With Psychiatry Consultation for Musculoskeletal Trauma Patients. Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1? An Adaptive Pacing Intervention for Adults Living With Long COVID: A Narrative Study of Patient Experiences of Using the PaceMe app.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1