Beyond community engagement: perspectives on the meaningful involvement of people with HIV and affected communities (MIPA) in HIV cure research in The Netherlands.
Tamika A Marcos, Kai J Jonas, Maaike A J Noorman, Chantal den Daas, John B F de Wit, Sarah E Stutterheim
{"title":"Beyond community engagement: perspectives on the meaningful involvement of people with HIV and affected communities (MIPA) in HIV cure research in The Netherlands.","authors":"Tamika A Marcos, Kai J Jonas, Maaike A J Noorman, Chantal den Daas, John B F de Wit, Sarah E Stutterheim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meaningful involvement of people with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure research is essential to ensuring that cure research efforts are conducted transparently, socially justly, and ethically. This study set out to investigate how people with HIV and affected communities are involved in cure research in the Netherlands and explore what can be done to optimize involvement and engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-five semi-structured online, telephone, and face-to-face interviews were conducted with people with HIV (<i>N</i> = 30), key populations (<i>N</i> = 35), and key informants (KI; <i>N</i> = 20) in the field of HIV. The interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Awareness of the meaningful involvement of people with HIV (MIPA) efforts was low among people with HIV and key populations, which contrasted with KI, who exhibited greater awareness. People with HIV and KI emphasized the importance of MIPA in ensuring the representation of lived experiences in HIV cure research and fostering trust between communities and researchers. Practical implementations of MIPA were unclear, ultimately resulting in difficulties defining MIPA beyond clinical trial participation. People with HIV and key populations also doubted their skills and self-efficacy to make meaningful contributions when confronted with involvement beyond participating in research and clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIPA is crucial for improving the quality, transparency, and ethical conduct of HIV cure research. It emphasizes the need for increased awareness and funding, standardized guidelines to ensure meaningful involvement, and combat tokenism and misconceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"2335454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Meaningful involvement of people with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure research is essential to ensuring that cure research efforts are conducted transparently, socially justly, and ethically. This study set out to investigate how people with HIV and affected communities are involved in cure research in the Netherlands and explore what can be done to optimize involvement and engagement.
Methods: Eighty-five semi-structured online, telephone, and face-to-face interviews were conducted with people with HIV (N = 30), key populations (N = 35), and key informants (KI; N = 20) in the field of HIV. The interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Awareness of the meaningful involvement of people with HIV (MIPA) efforts was low among people with HIV and key populations, which contrasted with KI, who exhibited greater awareness. People with HIV and KI emphasized the importance of MIPA in ensuring the representation of lived experiences in HIV cure research and fostering trust between communities and researchers. Practical implementations of MIPA were unclear, ultimately resulting in difficulties defining MIPA beyond clinical trial participation. People with HIV and key populations also doubted their skills and self-efficacy to make meaningful contributions when confronted with involvement beyond participating in research and clinical trials.
Conclusions: MIPA is crucial for improving the quality, transparency, and ethical conduct of HIV cure research. It emphasizes the need for increased awareness and funding, standardized guidelines to ensure meaningful involvement, and combat tokenism and misconceptions.
背景:艾滋病病毒感染者和受影响社区有意义地参与艾滋病治疗研究,对于确保治疗研究工作透明、社会公正和符合道德规范至关重要。本研究旨在调查荷兰艾滋病病毒感染者和受影响社区如何参与治愈研究,并探讨如何优化参与和介入:方法:对 HIV 感染者(30 人)、关键人群(35 人)和 HIV 领域的关键信息提供者(20 人)进行了 85 次半结构化在线、电话和面对面访谈。采用反思性主题分析法对访谈进行了分析:艾滋病毒感染者和关键人群对艾滋病毒感染者有意义的参与(MIPA)工作的认识程度较低,而关键信息提供者的认识程度更高。艾滋病病毒感染者和知识分子强调,有意义的艾滋病病毒感染者参与(MIPA)对于确保在艾滋病病毒治愈研究中体现生活经验以及促进社区与研究人员之间的信任非常重要。MIPA 的实际执行情况并不明确,最终导致难以界定临床试验参与之外的 MIPA。艾滋病病毒感染者和关键人群在面对参与研究和临床试验之外的工作时,也怀疑自己是否有能力和自我效能做出有意义的贡献:MIPA 对于提高 HIV 治愈研究的质量、透明度和道德操守至关重要。结论:MIPA 对于提高 HIV 治愈研究的质量、透明度和道德操守至关重要,它强调了提高意识和增加资金的必要性、确保有意义参与的标准化指南以及打击象征主义和误解的必要性。