Patency, assessment, and management of central catheter occlusion in adult patients in the intensive care unit: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000426
Paula Marqués Irigoyen, Marina Gallego Jimenez, Eva María López Arellano, Montserrat Sicilia Pérez, Rebeca Villanueva Cabredo
{"title":"Patency, assessment, and management of central catheter occlusion in adult patients in the intensive care unit: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Paula Marqués Irigoyen, Marina Gallego Jimenez, Eva María López Arellano, Montserrat Sicilia Pérez, Rebeca Villanueva Cabredo","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cannulation with a central venous catheter (CVC) is a common procedure used in critical care. One of the main complications is occlusion, which can lead to delayed treatment, prolonged hospital stay, and increased health care costs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this project was to promote evidence-based practice for nurses caring for patients with a CVC in a Spanish intensive care unit. The project also aimed to reduce CVC occlusion and ensure CVC patency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was guided by the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare and the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Seven phases were followed using evidence-based auditing and feedback. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools were used to support data collection, data analysis, and implementation planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After project implementation, the following results were obtained. Criterion 1 (assessing the CVC, flushing, and aspirating) reached 100% compliance in both audits. Criterion 2 (occlusion documentation) showed a modest improvement, rising from 13.33% to 36.67%. Improvement for Criterion 3 (the need for a policy and protocol) was excellent, rising from 0% at baseline to 100% following implementation. Criterion 4 (rapid instillation of an appropriate thrombolytic agent if a CVC is occluded) remained at 0% compliance in both audits. Criterion 5 (continuing education for health care professionals) improved from 10% to 60%. Criterion 6 (flushing and locking before procedures) improved from 90% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The project objectives were largely met and resulted in a protocol, which has been shared with other departments within the hospital. The implementation of best clinical practice will be continued, including the use of thrombolytic agents.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A200.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cannulation with a central venous catheter (CVC) is a common procedure used in critical care. One of the main complications is occlusion, which can lead to delayed treatment, prolonged hospital stay, and increased health care costs.

Objective: The aim of this project was to promote evidence-based practice for nurses caring for patients with a CVC in a Spanish intensive care unit. The project also aimed to reduce CVC occlusion and ensure CVC patency.

Methods: This project was guided by the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare and the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Seven phases were followed using evidence-based auditing and feedback. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools were used to support data collection, data analysis, and implementation planning.

Results: After project implementation, the following results were obtained. Criterion 1 (assessing the CVC, flushing, and aspirating) reached 100% compliance in both audits. Criterion 2 (occlusion documentation) showed a modest improvement, rising from 13.33% to 36.67%. Improvement for Criterion 3 (the need for a policy and protocol) was excellent, rising from 0% at baseline to 100% following implementation. Criterion 4 (rapid instillation of an appropriate thrombolytic agent if a CVC is occluded) remained at 0% compliance in both audits. Criterion 5 (continuing education for health care professionals) improved from 10% to 60%. Criterion 6 (flushing and locking before procedures) improved from 90% to 100%.

Conclusion: The project objectives were largely met and resulted in a protocol, which has been shared with other departments within the hospital. The implementation of best clinical practice will be continued, including the use of thrombolytic agents.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A200.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室成人患者中央导管闭塞的通畅、评估和管理:最佳实践实施项目。
导言:使用中心静脉导管(CVC)插管是重症监护中的一种常见程序。主要并发症之一是闭塞,可导致治疗延误、住院时间延长和医疗费用增加:该项目的目的是向在西班牙重症监护病房护理使用 CVC 患者的护士推广循证实践。该项目还旨在减少 CVC 闭塞,确保 CVC 的通畅:该项目以 JBI 循证医疗模式和 JBI 循证实施框架为指导。采用循证审核和反馈方法,共分为七个阶段。JBI临床证据实际应用系统(PACES)和将研究融入实践(GRiP)工具用于支持数据收集、数据分析和实施规划:项目实施后,取得了以下成果。标准 1(评估 CVC、冲洗和抽吸)在两次审核中均达到 100%。标准 2(闭塞记录)略有改善,从 13.33% 提高到 36.67%。标准 3(对政策和规程的需求)的改进非常显著,从基线的 0% 提高到实施后的 100% 。标准 4(在 CVC 闭塞时迅速注入适当的溶栓药物)在两次审核中的达标率均为 0%。标准 5(医护人员继续教育)从 10% 提高到 60%。标准 6(手术前冲洗和锁定)从 90% 提高到 100%:项目目标已基本实现,并制定了一份协议,与医院其他部门共享。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A200。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project. Improving the quality of medication administration practices in a tertiary Australian hospital: a best practice implementation project. Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1