Pediatric disaster preparedness curriculum across emergency medicine residencies.

Lea Ohana-Sarna Cahan, Alexander Hart, Attila J Hertelendy, Amalia Voskanyan, Debra L Weiner, Gregory R Ciottone
{"title":"Pediatric disaster preparedness curriculum across emergency medicine residencies.","authors":"Lea Ohana-Sarna Cahan, Alexander Hart, Attila J Hertelendy, Amalia Voskanyan, Debra L Weiner, Gregory R Ciottone","doi":"10.5055/ajdm.0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess pediatric disaster medicine (PDM) instruction in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and to identify barriers to integrating these skills into EM training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National survey study of United States EM Residency Program Directors (PDs) and Assistant PDs during the 2021-2022 academic year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 186 EM residency programs identified, a total of 24 responses were recorded with a response rate of 12.9 percent. Importance of training was rated 5.79 (standard deviation 2.51) using the Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. Out of 24 programs, 17 (70.8 percent) do not have any PDM training as part of residency training. Live drill, simulation, and tabletop were identified as most effective methods to deliver PDM training with the Likert scale score of 4.78, 4.6, and 4.47, respectively. Senior trainees' level of -knowledge/skills with family reunification (Likert 2.09/5; chemical-biological-radiological-nuclear explosive 2.95/5) and mass casualty preparation of the emergency department (3.3/5) as assessed by the respondents. The main barrier to education included logistics, eg, space and costs (Likert 3.7/5), lack of didactic time (3.7/5), and limited faculty knowledge, skill, or experience (3.3/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDM training is lacking and requires standardization. This study highlights the opportunity for the creation of a model for EM resident education in PDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":40040,"journal":{"name":"American journal of disaster medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of disaster medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.0463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess pediatric disaster medicine (PDM) instruction in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and to identify barriers to integrating these skills into EM training.

Methods: National survey study of United States EM Residency Program Directors (PDs) and Assistant PDs during the 2021-2022 academic year.

Results: Of the 186 EM residency programs identified, a total of 24 responses were recorded with a response rate of 12.9 percent. Importance of training was rated 5.79 (standard deviation 2.51) using the Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. Out of 24 programs, 17 (70.8 percent) do not have any PDM training as part of residency training. Live drill, simulation, and tabletop were identified as most effective methods to deliver PDM training with the Likert scale score of 4.78, 4.6, and 4.47, respectively. Senior trainees' level of -knowledge/skills with family reunification (Likert 2.09/5; chemical-biological-radiological-nuclear explosive 2.95/5) and mass casualty preparation of the emergency department (3.3/5) as assessed by the respondents. The main barrier to education included logistics, eg, space and costs (Likert 3.7/5), lack of didactic time (3.7/5), and limited faculty knowledge, skill, or experience (3.3/5).

Conclusion: PDM training is lacking and requires standardization. This study highlights the opportunity for the creation of a model for EM resident education in PDM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊医学住院医生的儿科灾难准备课程。
目的评估急诊医学(EM)住院医师培训项目中的儿科灾难医学(PDM)教学,并找出将这些技能纳入急诊医学培训的障碍:方法:在2021-2022学年对美国急诊科住院医师培训项目主任(PD)和助理主任进行全国性调查研究:在已确定的 186 个急诊科住院医师培训项目中,共收到 24 份回复,回复率为 12.9%。采用1至10分的李克特量表对培训的重要性评分为5.79分(标准偏差为2.51分)。在 24 个项目中,有 17 个项目(70.8%)没有将 PDM 培训作为住院医师培训的一部分。现场演练、模拟训练和桌面训练被认为是提供 PDM 培训最有效的方法,其李克特量表得分分别为 4.78、4.6 和 4.47。根据受访者的评估,高级学员对家庭团聚(Likert 2.09/5;化学-生物-放射-核爆炸 2.95/5)和急诊科大规模伤亡准备(3.3/5)的知识/技能水平。教育的主要障碍包括后勤,如空间和成本(Likert 3.7/5)、缺乏授课时间(3.7/5)以及教师知识、技能或经验有限(3.3/5):结论:PDM 培训不足,需要标准化。本研究强调了建立 EM 住院医师 PDM 教育模式的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of disaster medicine
American journal of disaster medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: With the publication of the American Journal of Disaster Medicine, for the first time, comes real guidance in this new medical specialty from the country"s foremost experts in areas most physicians and medical professionals have never seen…a deadly cocktail of catastrophic events like blast wounds and post explosion injuries, biological weapons contamination and mass physical and psychological trauma that comes in the wake of natural disasters and disease outbreak. The journal has one goal: to provide physicians and medical professionals the essential informational tools they need as they seek to combine emergency medical and trauma skills with crisis management and new forms of triage.
期刊最新文献
Protection enhancement strategies of potential outbreaks during Hajj. Perceptions regarding second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among Indian adults: A cross-sectional study. Agile response to critical need for clinical trial accessibility during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. Pediatric disaster preparedness curriculum across emergency medicine residencies. Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSET) course improves military surgeon confidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1