Safe postoperative outcomes following early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis regardless of symptom onset.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6165
Joseph Do Woong Choi, Matthew John Fong, Aswin Shanmugalingam, Anoosha Aslam, Syed Aqeel Abbas Kazmi, Rukmini Kulkarni, Richard James Curran
{"title":"Safe postoperative outcomes following early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis regardless of symptom onset.","authors":"Joseph Do Woong Choi, Matthew John Fong, Aswin Shanmugalingam, Anoosha Aslam, Syed Aqeel Abbas Kazmi, Rukmini Kulkarni, Richard James Curran","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is growing evidence for reduced post-operative complications, and lower hospital costs associated with early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis (AC) compared to delayed surgery. Limited high-quality evidence exists for how early, if at all, should surgeons be operating emergently for AC based on symptom onset.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seven hundred seventy-four patients who had cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon between January 2015-October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Five hundred fourty-one patients were analysed. Patients were divided into three groups based on symptom onset: Group 1: 0-72 hours (n= 305), Group 2: 72 hrs-1 week (n= 154) and Group 3: >1 week (n= 82).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median operative time was most prolonged in Group 2 (96.5 minutes), and had the greatest proportion of reconstituting 95% cholecystectomies (n= 22/154, 14.29%) compared to Group 1 (p> 0.05). The conversion to open was between 0.65-1.64% in all groups. The greatest proportion of bile leak occurred in Group 1 (n= 7/305, 2.3%) followed by Group 3 (n= 1/82, 1.22%) (p> 0.05). All were successfully managed with ERCP and biliary stent. Median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in Group 2 (2.3 days) compared to Group 1 (2 days) (p= 0.03). The proportion of 95% cholecystectomies in Group 2 and 3 were not significant compared to Group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early cholecystectomy for calculus cholecystitis, irrespective of the timing of symptoms appears to have safe postoperative outcomes. Surgeons do not necessarily need to limit early cholecystectomy for within 72 hours of symptom onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There is growing evidence for reduced post-operative complications, and lower hospital costs associated with early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis (AC) compared to delayed surgery. Limited high-quality evidence exists for how early, if at all, should surgeons be operating emergently for AC based on symptom onset.

Material and methods: Seven hundred seventy-four patients who had cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon between January 2015-October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Five hundred fourty-one patients were analysed. Patients were divided into three groups based on symptom onset: Group 1: 0-72 hours (n= 305), Group 2: 72 hrs-1 week (n= 154) and Group 3: >1 week (n= 82).

Results: Median operative time was most prolonged in Group 2 (96.5 minutes), and had the greatest proportion of reconstituting 95% cholecystectomies (n= 22/154, 14.29%) compared to Group 1 (p> 0.05). The conversion to open was between 0.65-1.64% in all groups. The greatest proportion of bile leak occurred in Group 1 (n= 7/305, 2.3%) followed by Group 3 (n= 1/82, 1.22%) (p> 0.05). All were successfully managed with ERCP and biliary stent. Median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in Group 2 (2.3 days) compared to Group 1 (2 days) (p= 0.03). The proportion of 95% cholecystectomies in Group 2 and 3 were not significant compared to Group 1.

Conclusion: Early cholecystectomy for calculus cholecystitis, irrespective of the timing of symptoms appears to have safe postoperative outcomes. Surgeons do not necessarily need to limit early cholecystectomy for within 72 hours of symptom onset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性结石性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术后,无论症状出现与否,均可获得安全的术后效果。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,与延迟手术相比,急性结石性胆囊炎(AC)的早期胆囊切除术可减少术后并发症,降低住院费用。关于外科医生是否应该根据症状的出现尽早对急性结石性胆囊炎进行紧急手术,目前只有有限的高质量证据:回顾性研究了 2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间由一名外科医生实施胆囊切除术的 7074 例患者。对 541 名患者进行了分析。根据症状发作时间将患者分为三组:第一组:0-72小时(305人),第二组:72小时-1周(154人),第三组:>1周(82人):结果:与第1组相比,第2组的中位手术时间最长(96.5分钟),95%胆囊切除术后再次手术的比例最高(n= 22/154,14.29%)(p> 0.05)。各组转为开腹手术的比例在 0.65-1.64% 之间。胆漏发生率最高的是第 1 组(n= 7/305,2.3%),其次是第 3 组(n= 1/82,1.22%)(p> 0.05)。所有患者均成功接受了 ERCP 和胆道支架治疗。与第一组(2 天)相比,第二组(2.3 天)的中位住院时间明显延长(p= 0.03)。第2组和第3组95%胆囊切除术的比例与第1组相比无显著差异:结论:结石性胆囊炎无论何时出现症状,早期进行胆囊切除术似乎都能获得安全的术后效果。外科医生不一定非要在症状出现 72 小时内进行早期胆囊切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK. Musinous cystic neoplasia mimicking hydatid cyst in the liver: Two rare cases Comments on ‘Percutaneous gas decompression can ease endoscopic derotation in sigmoid volvulus’ Pathological complete response and associated factors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective study Effect of silver colloid dressing over conventional dressings in diabetic foot ulcer: A prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1