Experiencing accessibility of historical heritage places with individuals living with visible and invisible disabilities.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1379139
Alicia Ruiz-Rodrigo, Ernesto Morales, Maryem Lakoud, Jonathan Riendeau, Miranda Lemay, Ariane Savaria, Samuel Mathieu, Isabelle Feillou, François Routhier
{"title":"Experiencing accessibility of historical heritage places with individuals living with visible and invisible disabilities.","authors":"Alicia Ruiz-Rodrigo, Ernesto Morales, Maryem Lakoud, Jonathan Riendeau, Miranda Lemay, Ariane Savaria, Samuel Mathieu, Isabelle Feillou, François Routhier","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1379139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Around 16% of world's population lives with visible and invisible disabilities. People with disabilities' participation may be limited because of the environmental obstacles. Moreover, historic heritage places were built before the development of accessibility standards and the rights of people living with disabilities and the majority were not designed to be accessible. Access to historic heritage places is important for carrying out the activities in place but also to create and reinforce identity. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of people with visible and invisible disabilities when visiting heritage sites considering accessibility issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a qualitative interpretive description. Participants were adults with visible (e.g., motor disability) or invisible (e.g., autism) disabilities. For data collection, go along interviews (also referred to in the literature as \"walking interview\" in two different locations in the Historic District of Old Quebec in Quebec City were conducted. Thematic analysis was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one participants completed two go along interviews: one in the <i>Séminaire de Québec</i> (Seminary of Quebec City) and the other in Petit-Champlain and Place Royale areas of Quebec City. Three themes emerged: (1) Obstacles and impact on participation; (2) Disabling accessibility; and (3) Heritage meaning.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The barriers identified by participants are diverse and differ according to the person and the type of disability. However, social and leisure activities were particularly limited, despite the strategies developed by some participants. Participants in the study demonstrated an interest in accessing to heritage places, therefore it seems essential to consider the needs of people with disabilities when developing accessibility solutions, and to seek a balance between preserving heritage and promoting inclusive and equitable access for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11021605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1379139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Around 16% of world's population lives with visible and invisible disabilities. People with disabilities' participation may be limited because of the environmental obstacles. Moreover, historic heritage places were built before the development of accessibility standards and the rights of people living with disabilities and the majority were not designed to be accessible. Access to historic heritage places is important for carrying out the activities in place but also to create and reinforce identity. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of people with visible and invisible disabilities when visiting heritage sites considering accessibility issues.

Methods: This study is a qualitative interpretive description. Participants were adults with visible (e.g., motor disability) or invisible (e.g., autism) disabilities. For data collection, go along interviews (also referred to in the literature as "walking interview" in two different locations in the Historic District of Old Quebec in Quebec City were conducted. Thematic analysis was done.

Results: Twenty-one participants completed two go along interviews: one in the Séminaire de Québec (Seminary of Quebec City) and the other in Petit-Champlain and Place Royale areas of Quebec City. Three themes emerged: (1) Obstacles and impact on participation; (2) Disabling accessibility; and (3) Heritage meaning.

Discussion: The barriers identified by participants are diverse and differ according to the person and the type of disability. However, social and leisure activities were particularly limited, despite the strategies developed by some participants. Participants in the study demonstrated an interest in accessing to heritage places, therefore it seems essential to consider the needs of people with disabilities when developing accessibility solutions, and to seek a balance between preserving heritage and promoting inclusive and equitable access for all.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与看得见和看不见的残疾人一起体验历史遗产地的无障碍环境。
导言:全世界约有 16% 的人口患有看得见和看不见的残疾。由于环境障碍,残疾人的参与可能受到限制。此外,历史遗产地是在无障碍标准和残疾人权利制定之前建造的,而且大多数历史遗产地的设计都不是无障碍的。历史遗产地的无障碍环境对于在当地开展活动非常重要,同时也能创造和强化身份认同。本研究旨在探讨有形和无形残疾人士在参观遗产地时考虑无障碍问题的经历:本研究为定性解释性描述。参与者为有明显残疾(如肢体残疾)或无形残疾(如自闭症)的成年人。为了收集数据,我们在魁北克市老魁北克历史区的两个不同地点进行了沿途访谈(文献中也称为 "步行访谈")。并进行了主题分析:21 名参与者完成了两次步行访谈:一次在魁北克市神学院(Séminaire de Québec),另一次在魁北克市小尚普兰区(Petit-Champlain)和皇家广场(Place Royale)。出现了三个主题:(1) 参与的障碍和影响;(2) 无障碍环境;(3) 遗产的意义:讨论:参与者发现的障碍多种多样,因人而异,因残疾类型而异。然而,尽管一些参与者制定了一些策略,但社交和休闲活动尤其受到限制。因此,在制定无障碍解决方案时,有必要考虑残疾人的需求,并在保护遗产与促进所有人的包容性和公平无障碍之间寻求平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SONOICE! a Sonar-Voice dynamic user interface for assisting individuals with blindness and visual impairment in pinpointing elements in 2D tactile readers. Innovative approaches for managing patients with chronic vestibular disorders: follow-up indicators and predictive markers for studying the vestibular error signal. Recommendations for clinical decision-making when offering exoskeletons for community use in individuals with spinal cord injury. Editorial: Rehabilitation, communication disorders and person-family-centered care. Person-centered aural rehabilitation program improved mood, cognition, and auditory processing in a professional musician who uses a hearing aid and cochlear implant: Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1