The right to know from the opt-out effectiveness system perspective in organ transplantation cases.

Q3 Medicine Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36740/Merkur202402115
Daniela Kokina, Karina Palkova
{"title":"The right to know from the opt-out effectiveness system perspective in organ transplantation cases.","authors":"Daniela Kokina, Karina Palkova","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202402115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: This article examines the legal challenges associated with opt-out and opt-in systems in transplantation cases. It focuses on the low public knowledge and awareness of the national transplantation system, assessing its compliance with international prerequisites for an opt-out system. The analysis centres on the \"right to know\" perspective and the effectiveness of opt-out in organ transplantation. .</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: The research methodology includes scientific principles, public surveys, relevant regulations from the Republic of Latvia and EU, and grey literature on the health system and organ donation in the EU. Scientific articles from databases such as Scopus and WOS were selected based on criteria such as language (English and Latvian) and focus on living wills and comparisons of organ donation systems. Previous EU and national studies, reports, and court judgments were used to analyse data on opt-in and opt-out transplantation systems and policy efficiency in organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: Individuals' right to autonomy over their bodies extends even after death, encompassing the right to integrity. Organ donation, being a deeply personal choice reflecting one's values and beliefs, plays a crucial role in saving lives through transplantation. To enhance cooperation and donation rates, international regulations stress the significance of public awareness regarding organ and tissue transplantation. Unfortunately, inadequate compliance by authorities and low awareness pose ethical and legal dilemmas, potentially violating constitutional rights. Reports highlight limited public understanding of transplantation systems, raising concerns, particularly in opt-out systems. National governments bear the responsibility of safeguarding these rights and addressing challenges beyond legal means, thus establishing a more ethical organ donation system that upholds voluntariness, generosity, and individual autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"52 2","pages":"246-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202402115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: This article examines the legal challenges associated with opt-out and opt-in systems in transplantation cases. It focuses on the low public knowledge and awareness of the national transplantation system, assessing its compliance with international prerequisites for an opt-out system. The analysis centres on the "right to know" perspective and the effectiveness of opt-out in organ transplantation. .

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The research methodology includes scientific principles, public surveys, relevant regulations from the Republic of Latvia and EU, and grey literature on the health system and organ donation in the EU. Scientific articles from databases such as Scopus and WOS were selected based on criteria such as language (English and Latvian) and focus on living wills and comparisons of organ donation systems. Previous EU and national studies, reports, and court judgments were used to analyse data on opt-in and opt-out transplantation systems and policy efficiency in organ transplantation.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Individuals' right to autonomy over their bodies extends even after death, encompassing the right to integrity. Organ donation, being a deeply personal choice reflecting one's values and beliefs, plays a crucial role in saving lives through transplantation. To enhance cooperation and donation rates, international regulations stress the significance of public awareness regarding organ and tissue transplantation. Unfortunately, inadequate compliance by authorities and low awareness pose ethical and legal dilemmas, potentially violating constitutional rights. Reports highlight limited public understanding of transplantation systems, raising concerns, particularly in opt-out systems. National governments bear the responsibility of safeguarding these rights and addressing challenges beyond legal means, thus establishing a more ethical organ donation system that upholds voluntariness, generosity, and individual autonomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从器官移植案例中的选择退出有效性系统角度看知情权。
目的目的:本文探讨了与移植案例中的选择退出和选择接受制度相关的法律挑战。文章重点关注公众对国家移植制度的了解和认识程度较低的问题,评估其是否符合国际上关于 "选择不接受 "制度的先决条件。分析以 "知情权 "观点和器官移植中选择退出的有效性为中心。患者和方法材料与方法:研究方法包括科学原则、公众调查、拉脱维亚共和国和欧盟的相关法规以及有关欧盟卫生系统和器官捐献的灰色文献。根据语言(英语和拉脱维亚语)、对生前预嘱的关注以及器官捐献系统的比较等标准,从 Scopus 和 WOS 等数据库中选择科学文章。欧盟和各国先前的研究、报告和法院判决被用来分析选择接受和选择不接受移植系统的数据以及器官移植的政策效率:结论:结论:个人对自己身体的自主权甚至延伸到死后,包括完整权。器官捐献是反映个人价值观和信仰的深层次个人选择,在通过移植挽救生命方面发挥着至关重要的作用。为了加强合作和提高捐献率,国际法规强调了提高公众对器官和组织移植认识的重要性。遗憾的是,当局遵守规定不力和公众认识不足造成了伦理和法律困境,有可能侵犯宪法权利。有报告强调,公众对移植系统的了解有限,这引起了人们的担忧,尤其是在选择不进行移植的系统中。各国政府有责任保障这些权利,应对法律手段之外的挑战,从而建立一个更加道德的器官捐献系统,坚持自愿、慷慨和个人自主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of early postoperative results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis. Coronavirus infection and systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome. Empathy, self-compassion, and depression correlations among health professionals in Northern Greece. Epidemiological parameters and monitoring of analysis of treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in insulin pump therapy with modified educational program. Evaluation of potential prevalence of onconeural antibodies in women with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1