The Johns Hopkins Physician-Scientist Training Program to Enhance Institutional Retention and Entry Into Academic Positions: An Evaluation of Program Effectiveness and Outcomes.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005748
Jordina Rincon-Torroella, James Feghali, Albert Antar, Tej D Azad, Antony Rosen, Roy C Ziegelstein, Paul B Rothman, Kathleen H Burns, Jessica L Bienstock, Andrea L Cox, Chetan Bettegowda
{"title":"The Johns Hopkins Physician-Scientist Training Program to Enhance Institutional Retention and Entry Into Academic Positions: An Evaluation of Program Effectiveness and Outcomes.","authors":"Jordina Rincon-Torroella, James Feghali, Albert Antar, Tej D Azad, Antony Rosen, Roy C Ziegelstein, Paul B Rothman, Kathleen H Burns, Jessica L Bienstock, Andrea L Cox, Chetan Bettegowda","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Johns Hopkins Physician-Scientist Training Program (PSTP) was implemented to overcome well-documented challenges in training and retaining physician-scientists by providing physician-scientist pathway training for residents and clinical fellows. The program's core tenets include monthly seminars, individualized feedback on project proposals, access to mentors, and institutional funding opportunities. This study evaluated the effectiveness and outcomes of the PTSP and provides a framework for replication.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A query of institutional demographic data and bibliometric variables of the PSTP participants (2017-2020) at a single academic medical center was conducted in 2021. In addition, a voluntary survey collected personal and program evaluation information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 145 PSTP scholars, 59 (41%) were women, and 41 (31%), 8 (6%), and 6 (5%) of scholars self-identified as Asian, Hispanic, and Black, respectively. Thirty-three (23%) scholars received PSTP research support or career development microgrants. Of 66 PSTP graduates, 29 (44%) remained at Johns Hopkins as clinical fellows or faculty. Of 48 PSTP graduates in a posttraining position, 42 (88%) were in academia, with the majority, 29 (76%), holding the rank of assistant professor. Fifty-nine of 140 available participants responded to the survey (42% response rate). The top-cited reason for joining the PSTP was exposure to mentors and administration (50/58 respondents, 86%), followed by seeking scholarly opportunities (37/58 respondents, 64%). Most scholars intended to continue a career as a physician-scientist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PSTP provides internal research support and institutional oversight. Although establishing close mentor-mentee relationships requires individualized approaches, the PSTP provided structured academic pathways that enhanced participating scholars' ability to apply for grants and jobs. The vast majority continued their careers as physician-scientists after training. In light of the national evidence of a \"leaky physician-scientist pipeline,\" programs such as the PSTP can be critical to entry into early academic career positions and institutional retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Johns Hopkins Physician-Scientist Training Program (PSTP) was implemented to overcome well-documented challenges in training and retaining physician-scientists by providing physician-scientist pathway training for residents and clinical fellows. The program's core tenets include monthly seminars, individualized feedback on project proposals, access to mentors, and institutional funding opportunities. This study evaluated the effectiveness and outcomes of the PTSP and provides a framework for replication.

Method: A query of institutional demographic data and bibliometric variables of the PSTP participants (2017-2020) at a single academic medical center was conducted in 2021. In addition, a voluntary survey collected personal and program evaluation information.

Results: Of 145 PSTP scholars, 59 (41%) were women, and 41 (31%), 8 (6%), and 6 (5%) of scholars self-identified as Asian, Hispanic, and Black, respectively. Thirty-three (23%) scholars received PSTP research support or career development microgrants. Of 66 PSTP graduates, 29 (44%) remained at Johns Hopkins as clinical fellows or faculty. Of 48 PSTP graduates in a posttraining position, 42 (88%) were in academia, with the majority, 29 (76%), holding the rank of assistant professor. Fifty-nine of 140 available participants responded to the survey (42% response rate). The top-cited reason for joining the PSTP was exposure to mentors and administration (50/58 respondents, 86%), followed by seeking scholarly opportunities (37/58 respondents, 64%). Most scholars intended to continue a career as a physician-scientist.

Conclusions: The PSTP provides internal research support and institutional oversight. Although establishing close mentor-mentee relationships requires individualized approaches, the PSTP provided structured academic pathways that enhanced participating scholars' ability to apply for grants and jobs. The vast majority continued their careers as physician-scientists after training. In light of the national evidence of a "leaky physician-scientist pipeline," programs such as the PSTP can be critical to entry into early academic career positions and institutional retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约翰斯-霍普金斯大学医生科学家培训计划,旨在提高机构的留任率和学术职位的进入率:对计划效果和成果的评估。
目的:约翰霍普金斯大学的医生科学家培训计划(PSTP)旨在通过为住院医师和临床研究员提供医生科学家途径培训,克服在培训和留住医生科学家方面存在的有据可查的挑战。该计划的核心原则包括每月举办研讨会、对项目提案进行个性化反馈、提供导师和机构资助机会。本研究评估了 PTSP 的有效性和成果,并为推广提供了一个框架:2021 年,对一个学术医学中心的 PSTP 参与者(2017-2020 年)的机构人口统计学数据和文献计量变量进行了查询。此外,还通过自愿调查收集了个人和项目评估信息:在145名PSTP学者中,59人(41%)为女性,41人(31%)、8人(6%)和6人(5%)分别自我认同为亚裔、西班牙裔和黑人。33(23%)名学者获得了 PSTP 的研究支持或职业发展小额赠款。在 66 名 PSTP 毕业生中,有 29 人(44%)留在约翰霍普金斯大学担任临床研究员或教职。在 48 位接受培训后任职的 PSTP 毕业生中,42 位(88%)在学术界任职,其中大多数 29 位(76%)担任助理教授。在 140 名参与者中,有 59 人对调查做出了回复(回复率为 42%)。加入 PSTP 的首要原因是接触导师和管理部门(50/58 位受访者,86%),其次是寻求学术机会(37/58 位受访者,64%)。大多数学者打算继续从事医生-科学家职业:PSTP提供内部研究支持和机构监督。尽管建立密切的师徒关系需要因人而异的方法,但 PSTP 提供了结构化的学术途径,提高了参与学者申请基金和工作的能力。绝大多数人在培训后继续从事医生科学家的职业。鉴于全国范围内都存在 "医生-科学家管道疏漏 "的证据,像 PSTP 这样的项目对于进入早期学术职业岗位和留住人才至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Blackbird and Dreams. Artist's Statement: Rod of Asclepius. From Launch to Leadership: Successfully Navigating an Academic Career Path. The Johns Hopkins Physician-Scientist Training Program to Enhance Institutional Retention and Entry Into Academic Positions: An Evaluation of Program Effectiveness and Outcomes. Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1