Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES JMIR Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.2196/50297
Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg
{"title":"Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ana Luiza Dallora, Ewa Kazimiera Andersson, Bruna Gregory Palm, Doris Bohman, Gunilla Björling, Ludmiła Marcinowicz, Louise Stjernberg, Peter Anderberg","doi":"10.2196/50297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ<sub>all</sub>=0.265; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=0.190; ρ<sub>Polish</sub>=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ<sub>all</sub>=0.360; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=0.341; ρ<sub>Polish</sub>=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρ<sub>all</sub>=-0.196; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=-0.262; ρ<sub>Polish</sub>=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρ<sub>all</sub>=-0.209; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=-0.347; ρ<sub>Polish</sub>=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρ<sub>Swedish</sub>=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/14643.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11091804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing presence of digital technologies in health care requires the health workforce to have proficiency in subjects such as informatics. This has implications in the education of nursing students, as their preparedness to use these technologies in clinical situations is something that course administrators need to consider. Thus, students' attitudes toward technology could be investigated to assess their needs regarding this proficiency.

Objective: This study aims to investigate attitudes (enthusiasm and anxiety) toward technology among nursing students and to identify factors associated with those attitudes.

Methods: Nursing students at 2 universities in Sweden and 1 university in Poland were invited to answer a questionnaire. Data about attitudes (anxiety and enthusiasm) toward technology, eHealth literacy, electronic device skills, and frequency of using electronic devices and sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical inferences.

Results: In total, 646 students answered the questionnaire-342 (52.9%) from the Swedish sites and 304 (47.1%) from the Polish site. It was observed that the students' technology enthusiasm (techEnthusiasm) was on the higher end of the Technophilia instrument (score range 1-5): 3.83 (SD 0.90), 3.62 (SD 0.94), and 4.04 (SD 0.78) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Technology anxiety (techAnxiety) was on the midrange of the Technophilia instrument: 2.48 (SD 0.96), 2.37 (SD 1), and 2.60 (SD 0.89) for the whole sample, Swedish students, and Polish students, respectively. Regarding techEnthusiasm among the nursing students, a negative correlation with age was found for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.201) who were generally older than the Polish sample, and positive correlations with the eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=0.265; ρSwedish=0.190; ρPolish=0.352) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=0.360; ρSwedish=0.341; ρPolish=0.309) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples. Regarding techAnxiety among the nursing students, a positive correlation with age was found in the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=0.184), and negative correlations with eHealth Literacy Scale score (P<.001; ρall=-0.196; ρSwedish=-0.262; ρPolish=-0.133) and with the perceived skill in using computer devices (P<.001; ρall=-0.209; ρSwedish=-0.347; ρPolish=-0.134) were found for the Swedish, Polish, and total samples and with the semester only for the Swedish sample (P<.001; ρSwedish=-0.124). Gender differences were found regarding techAnxiety in the Swedish sample, with women exhibiting a higher mean score than men (2.451, SD 1.014 and 1.987, SD 0.854, respectively).

Conclusions: This study highlights nursing students' techEnthusiasm and techAnxiety, emphasizing correlations with various factors. With health care's increasing reliance on technology, integrating health technology-related topics into education is crucial for future professionals to address health care challenges effectively.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/14643.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生对技术的态度:多中心横断面研究。
背景:数字技术在医疗保健领域的应用日益广泛,这就要求医疗保健人员熟练掌握信息学等学科的知识。这对护理专业学生的教育产生了影响,因为他们在临床情况下使用这些技术的准备程度是课程管理人员需要考虑的问题。因此,可以通过调查学生对技术的态度来评估他们在这方面的需求:本研究旨在调查护理专业学生对技术的态度(热情和焦虑),并找出与这些态度相关的因素:方法:邀请瑞典两所大学和波兰一所大学的护理专业学生回答问卷。收集了有关对技术的态度(焦虑和热情)、电子健康知识、电子设备技能、使用电子设备的频率以及社会人口学数据。采用描述性统计来描述数据的特征。统计推断采用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数和曼-惠特尼 U 检验:共有 646 名学生回答了问卷,其中瑞典校区 342 人(52.9%),波兰校区 304 人(47.1%)。据观察,学生的技术热情(techEnthusiasm)在技术嗜好工具(分值范围 1-5)中处于较高水平:整个样本、瑞典学生和波兰学生的技术热情分别为 3.83(标准差 0.90)、3.62(标准差 0.94)和 4.04(标准差 0.78)。技术焦虑(techAnxiety)处于技术嗜好工具的中等水平:全体样本、瑞典学生和波兰学生分别为 2.48(标准差 0.96)、2.37(标准差 1)和 2.60(标准差 0.89)。关于护理专业学生的科技热情,瑞典样本发现与年龄呈负相关(PSwedish=-0.201),他们的年龄普遍高于波兰样本,而与电子健康素养量表得分呈正相关(Pall=0.265;ρ瑞典=0.190;ρ波兰=0.352),瑞典、波兰和总样本与使用计算机设备的感知技能(Pall=0.360;ρ瑞典=0.341;ρ波兰=0.309)呈正相关。关于护理专业学生的技术焦虑,在瑞典样本中发现与年龄呈正相关(PSwedish=0.184),与电子健康素养量表得分呈负相关(Pall=-0.196;ρSwedish=-0.262;ρPolish=-0.在瑞典、波兰和总样本中发现了性别差异(Pall=-0.209;ρ瑞典=-0.347;ρ波兰=-0.134),仅在瑞典样本中发现了学期差异(PSwedish=-0.124)。在瑞典样本中,技术焦虑存在性别差异,女性的平均得分高于男性(分别为 2.451,SD 1.014 和 1.987,SD 0.854):本研究突出了护理专业学生的科技热情和科技焦虑,强调了与各种因素的相关性。国际注册报告标识符(irrid):RR2-10.2196/14643。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT-4 Omni Performance in USMLE Disciplines and Clinical Skills: Comparative Analysis. Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Measure Resident Clinical Experiences and Identify Training Gaps: Development and Usability Study. The Potential of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Reducing Uncertainty in Medicine and Directions for Medical Education. A Pilot Project to Promote Research Competency in Medical Students Through Journal Clubs: Mixed Methods Study. Transforming the Future of Digital Health Education: Redesign of a Graduate Program Using Competency Mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1