Implicit relational aspects of the therapeutic relationship in psychoanalytic treatments: an examination of linguistic style entrainment over time.

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2341780
Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Daniel S Spina, Lena Müller-Frommeyer, Bernard S Gorman, Karl Stukenberg, Sherwood Waldron
{"title":"Implicit relational aspects of the therapeutic relationship in psychoanalytic treatments: an examination of linguistic style entrainment over time.","authors":"Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Daniel S Spina, Lena Müller-Frommeyer, Bernard S Gorman, Karl Stukenberg, Sherwood Waldron","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2341780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In an attempt to operationalize an implicit aspect of the therapeutic relationship, this study assesses reciprocal linguistic style entrainment (rLSM) between the patient and therapist. rLSM is defined as the dynamic adjustment of function word usage to synchronize or to be in rhythm with another person as they change over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this exploratory study, levels of rLSM per talk turn were analyzed for 540 sessions of 27 long-term psychoanalytic treatments in relation to treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within sessions, rLSM appeared to decrease by the end of sessions and followed a negative linear trajectory, <i>β<sub>linear </sub></i>= -0.0002, <i>SE</i> < .001, <i>t</i> = -13.04, <i>p</i> < .001. Between sessions, rLSM showed significant variability such that neither a linear, nor a quadratic, nor a cubic trend line fit the session-by-session change over treatment. On average, therapist talk turns had significantly lower rLSM than patient talk turns, while accounting for the nested nature of the data using multilevel models <i>β<sub>SpeakerT</sub></i> = -0.033, <i>SE</i> = 0.009, <i>t</i> = -3.65, <i>p</i> < .001. Levels of rLSM did not relate to treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the rLSM variance was at the within-patient and within-session level. rLSM was no indicator of psychoanalytic treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2341780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In an attempt to operationalize an implicit aspect of the therapeutic relationship, this study assesses reciprocal linguistic style entrainment (rLSM) between the patient and therapist. rLSM is defined as the dynamic adjustment of function word usage to synchronize or to be in rhythm with another person as they change over time.

Method: In this exploratory study, levels of rLSM per talk turn were analyzed for 540 sessions of 27 long-term psychoanalytic treatments in relation to treatment outcomes.

Results: Within sessions, rLSM appeared to decrease by the end of sessions and followed a negative linear trajectory, βlinear = -0.0002, SE < .001, t = -13.04, p < .001. Between sessions, rLSM showed significant variability such that neither a linear, nor a quadratic, nor a cubic trend line fit the session-by-session change over treatment. On average, therapist talk turns had significantly lower rLSM than patient talk turns, while accounting for the nested nature of the data using multilevel models βSpeakerT = -0.033, SE = 0.009, t = -3.65, p < .001. Levels of rLSM did not relate to treatment outcome.

Conclusion: Most of the rLSM variance was at the within-patient and within-session level. rLSM was no indicator of psychoanalytic treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分析治疗中治疗关系的隐含关系方面:对语言风格随时间演变的研究。
研究目的为了对治疗关系的一个隐含方面进行操作化,本研究评估了患者与治疗师之间的互惠语言风格诱导(rLSM)。rLSM被定义为功能词用法的动态调整,以便随着时间的变化与他人同步或保持节奏:在这项探索性研究中,我们分析了 27 次长期精神分析治疗的 540 个疗程中每次谈话回合的 rLSM 水平与治疗结果的关系:在疗程内,rLSM 在疗程结束时出现下降,并呈负线性轨迹,βlinear = -0.0002,SE t = -13.04,p βSpeakerT = -0.033,SE = 0.009,t = -3.65,p 结论:大部分 rLSM 变异都与治疗结果有关:大部分 rLSM 变异存在于患者内部和疗程内部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
A first look at diversity gaps in psychotherapy research publications and representation. Are perceptions of the psychotherapist affected by the audiovisual quality of a teletherapy session? Decentering as a mediator of the effect of mindfulness on emotional distress: Evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. Therapists' emotional responses and their relation to patients' experience of attunement and responsiveness. Adolescent, caregivers, and therapists' experiences of youth and family suicide intervention: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1