Factors influencing the development of artificial intelligence in orthodontics.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12806
Ju-Myung Lee, Jun-Ho Moon, Ji-Ae Park, Jong-Hak Kim, Shin-Jae Lee
{"title":"Factors influencing the development of artificial intelligence in orthodontics.","authors":"Ju-Myung Lee, Jun-Ho Moon, Ji-Ae Park, Jong-Hak Kim, Shin-Jae Lee","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since developing AI procedures demands significant computing resources and time, the implementation of a careful experimental design is essential. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing the development of AI in orthodontics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 162 AI models were developed, with various combinations of sample sizes (170, 340, 679), input variables (40, 80, 160), output variables (38, 76, 154), training sessions (100, 500, 1000), and computer specifications (new vs. old). The TabNet deep-learning algorithm was used to develop these AI models, and leave-one-out cross-validation was applied in training. The goodness-of-fit of the regression models was compared using the adjusted coefficient of determination values, and the best-fit model was selected accordingly. Multiple linear regression analyses were employed to investigate the relationship between the influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing the number of training sessions enhanced the effectiveness of the AI models. The best-fit regression model for predicting the computational time of AI, which included logarithmic transformation of time, sample size, and training session variables, demonstrated an adjusted coefficient of determination of 0.99.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results show that estimating the time required for AI development may be possible using logarithmic transformations of time, sample size, and training session variables, followed by applying coefficients estimated through several pilot studies with reduced sample sizes and reduced training sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Since developing AI procedures demands significant computing resources and time, the implementation of a careful experimental design is essential. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing the development of AI in orthodontics.

Materials and methods: A total of 162 AI models were developed, with various combinations of sample sizes (170, 340, 679), input variables (40, 80, 160), output variables (38, 76, 154), training sessions (100, 500, 1000), and computer specifications (new vs. old). The TabNet deep-learning algorithm was used to develop these AI models, and leave-one-out cross-validation was applied in training. The goodness-of-fit of the regression models was compared using the adjusted coefficient of determination values, and the best-fit model was selected accordingly. Multiple linear regression analyses were employed to investigate the relationship between the influencing factors.

Results: Increasing the number of training sessions enhanced the effectiveness of the AI models. The best-fit regression model for predicting the computational time of AI, which included logarithmic transformation of time, sample size, and training session variables, demonstrated an adjusted coefficient of determination of 0.99.

Conclusion: The study results show that estimating the time required for AI development may be possible using logarithmic transformations of time, sample size, and training session variables, followed by applying coefficients estimated through several pilot studies with reduced sample sizes and reduced training sessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响正畸领域人工智能发展的因素。
目的:由于开发人工智能程序需要大量的计算资源和时间,因此实施精心的实验设计至关重要。本研究旨在调查影响正畸学人工智能发展的因素:共开发了 162 个人工智能模型,样本量(170、340、679)、输入变量(40、80、160)、输出变量(38、76、154)、训练次数(100、500、1000)和计算机规格(新与旧)的组合各不相同。这些人工智能模型的开发采用了 TabNet 深度学习算法,并在训练中进行了留一交叉验证。使用调整后的决定系数值对回归模型的拟合度进行比较,并据此选择最佳拟合模型。采用多元线性回归分析研究影响因素之间的关系:结果:增加训练次数提高了人工智能模型的有效性。预测人工智能计算时间的最佳拟合回归模型包括时间、样本量和培训次数变量的对数变换,其调整决定系数为 0.99:研究结果表明,通过对时间、样本量和培训课程变量进行对数变换,然后应用通过减少样本量和培训课程的若干试点研究估算出的系数,可以估算出人工智能开发所需的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1