Alexander Y Afanasyev, Yoonjin Kim, Igor S Tolokh, Igor V Sharakhov, Alexey V Onufriev
{"title":"The probability of chromatin to be at the nuclear lamina has no systematic effect on its transcription level in fruit flies.","authors":"Alexander Y Afanasyev, Yoonjin Kim, Igor S Tolokh, Igor V Sharakhov, Alexey V Onufriev","doi":"10.1186/s13072-024-00528-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between gene expression and positioning of genes at the nuclear envelope (NE) lined by nuclear lamina, but the exact relationship remains unclear, especially in light of the highly stochastic, transient nature of the gene association with the NE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this paper, we ask whether there is a causal, systematic, genome-wide relationship between the expression levels of the groups of genes in topologically associating domains (TADs) of Drosophila nuclei and the probabilities of TADs to be found at the NE. To investigate the nature of this possible relationship, we combine a coarse-grained dynamic model of the entire Drosophila nucleus with genome-wide gene expression data; we analyze the TAD averaged transcription levels of genes against the probabilities of individual TADs to be in contact with the NE in the control and lamins-depleted nuclei. Our findings demonstrate that, within the statistical error margin, the stochastic positioning of Drosophila melanogaster TADs at the NE does not, by itself, systematically affect the mean level of gene expression in these TADs, while the expected negative correlation is confirmed. The correlation is weak and disappears completely for TADs not containing lamina-associated domains (LADs) or TADs containing LADs, considered separately. Verifiable hypotheses regarding the underlying mechanism for the presence of the correlation without causality are discussed. These include the possibility that the epigenetic marks and affinity to the NE of a TAD are determined by various non-mutually exclusive mechanisms and remain relatively stable during interphase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the level of TADs, the probability of chromatin being in contact with the nuclear envelope has no systematic, causal effect on the transcription level in Drosophila. The conclusion is reached by combining model-derived time-evolution of TAD locations within the nucleus with their experimental gene expression levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":49253,"journal":{"name":"Epigenetics & Chromatin","volume":"17 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11071202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenetics & Chromatin","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-024-00528-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Multiple studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between gene expression and positioning of genes at the nuclear envelope (NE) lined by nuclear lamina, but the exact relationship remains unclear, especially in light of the highly stochastic, transient nature of the gene association with the NE.
Results: In this paper, we ask whether there is a causal, systematic, genome-wide relationship between the expression levels of the groups of genes in topologically associating domains (TADs) of Drosophila nuclei and the probabilities of TADs to be found at the NE. To investigate the nature of this possible relationship, we combine a coarse-grained dynamic model of the entire Drosophila nucleus with genome-wide gene expression data; we analyze the TAD averaged transcription levels of genes against the probabilities of individual TADs to be in contact with the NE in the control and lamins-depleted nuclei. Our findings demonstrate that, within the statistical error margin, the stochastic positioning of Drosophila melanogaster TADs at the NE does not, by itself, systematically affect the mean level of gene expression in these TADs, while the expected negative correlation is confirmed. The correlation is weak and disappears completely for TADs not containing lamina-associated domains (LADs) or TADs containing LADs, considered separately. Verifiable hypotheses regarding the underlying mechanism for the presence of the correlation without causality are discussed. These include the possibility that the epigenetic marks and affinity to the NE of a TAD are determined by various non-mutually exclusive mechanisms and remain relatively stable during interphase.
Conclusions: At the level of TADs, the probability of chromatin being in contact with the nuclear envelope has no systematic, causal effect on the transcription level in Drosophila. The conclusion is reached by combining model-derived time-evolution of TAD locations within the nucleus with their experimental gene expression levels.
背景:多项研究表明,基因表达与基因在核膜(NE)上的定位之间存在负相关,但两者之间的确切关系仍不清楚,特别是考虑到基因与核膜关联的高度随机性和瞬时性:在本文中,我们提出了一个问题:果蝇细胞核拓扑关联域(TADs)中各组基因的表达水平与TADs在NE中出现的概率之间是否存在因果、系统、全基因组的关系。为了研究这种可能关系的本质,我们将整个果蝇细胞核的粗粒度动态模型与全基因组基因表达数据相结合;我们分析了TAD平均基因转录水平与对照细胞核和缺失片蛋白细胞核中单个TAD与NE接触的概率之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,在统计误差范围内,黑腹果蝇 TAD 在 NE 上的随机定位本身并不会系统地影响这些 TAD 中基因表达的平均水平,而预期的负相关性却得到了证实。对于不含薄层相关结构域(LADs)的TADs或含有LADs的TADs来说,这种相关性很弱,而且完全消失了。我们讨论了关于无因果关系相关性存在的潜在机制的可验证假设。这些假设包括表观遗传标记和与 TAD 的 NE 的亲和性由各种非相互排斥的机制决定,并在间期保持相对稳定的可能性:在TAD水平上,染色质与核包膜接触的概率对果蝇的转录水平没有系统性的因果影响。这一结论是通过将细胞核内TAD位置的模型推导时间演变与其实验基因表达水平相结合得出的。
期刊介绍:
Epigenetics & Chromatin is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that publishes research, and reviews, providing novel insights into epigenetic inheritance and chromatin-based interactions. The journal aims to understand how gene and chromosomal elements are regulated and their activities maintained during processes such as cell division, differentiation and environmental alteration.