An exploratory study of test anxiety management workshop based on the Unified Protocol

Javier Matías Salgado, Rodrigo Lautaro Rojas, Milagros Celleri, Felipe Alejandro Cultraro, Nicolás Alejandro Vizioli
{"title":"An exploratory study of test anxiety management workshop based on the Unified Protocol","authors":"Javier Matías Salgado, Rodrigo Lautaro Rojas, Milagros Celleri, Felipe Alejandro Cultraro, Nicolás Alejandro Vizioli","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v35i163.525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Test anxiety is a multidimensional construct, defined as a set of phenomenological, physiological and behavioral\nresponses associated with cognitive processes linked to excessive concern about possible negative consequences in an evaluative situation. In university students, it presents occurrence rates between 10 % and 40 %. Therefore, the main objective of the present study is to evaluate the usefulness of a group and online workshop for managing this problem based on the Unified Protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 31 Argentinian students aged 18 to 35 years (M=25; SD=5.24) participated in the study, from which 93.5 % were women. They were evaluated with pre, post and follow-up measures in symptomatology associated with test anxiety (GTAI-AR), emotional regulation strategies (ERQ) and mindfulness (MAAS). The Wilcoxon test corroborated intragroup differences, and Hedge's g was calculated to measure effect size (ES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the primary variable, the differences were significant with moderate & large ES, which were maintained between the three measures applied. Respecting the secondary variables, in the pre-post measures, only cognitive reappraisal reflected significant ES (small).; in the post-follow-up, expressive suppression was the only\ndimension that showed meaningful ES (moderate), and in the pre-follow-up, it was found that only mindfulness showed considerable ES (small).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results are consistent with the Unified Protocol framework and current research on its application.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results are expected to be helpful for the design of similar interventions. Although the results were encouraging, more rigorous research is needed to study their efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"35 163, ene.-mar.","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v35i163.525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Test anxiety is a multidimensional construct, defined as a set of phenomenological, physiological and behavioral responses associated with cognitive processes linked to excessive concern about possible negative consequences in an evaluative situation. In university students, it presents occurrence rates between 10 % and 40 %. Therefore, the main objective of the present study is to evaluate the usefulness of a group and online workshop for managing this problem based on the Unified Protocol.

Methods: A total of 31 Argentinian students aged 18 to 35 years (M=25; SD=5.24) participated in the study, from which 93.5 % were women. They were evaluated with pre, post and follow-up measures in symptomatology associated with test anxiety (GTAI-AR), emotional regulation strategies (ERQ) and mindfulness (MAAS). The Wilcoxon test corroborated intragroup differences, and Hedge's g was calculated to measure effect size (ES).

Results: Regarding the primary variable, the differences were significant with moderate & large ES, which were maintained between the three measures applied. Respecting the secondary variables, in the pre-post measures, only cognitive reappraisal reflected significant ES (small).; in the post-follow-up, expressive suppression was the only dimension that showed meaningful ES (moderate), and in the pre-follow-up, it was found that only mindfulness showed considerable ES (small).

Discussion: The results are consistent with the Unified Protocol framework and current research on its application.

Conclusions: These results are expected to be helpful for the design of similar interventions. Although the results were encouraging, more rigorous research is needed to study their efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于统一协议的考试焦虑管理研讨会的探索性研究。
简介考试焦虑是一个多维度的概念,其特点是在评价情境中过度担心可能出现的负面后果,从而产生现象、生理、行为和认知反应。在大学生中,考试焦虑的发生率在 10 % 到 40 % 之间。我们的目的是评估基于统一协议的小组和在线研讨会在处理这一问题方面的实用性。方法:31 名年龄在 18-35 岁之间的阿根廷学生(男=25;女=5.24)参加了此次活动,其中 93.5% 为女性。作为主要变量的测试焦虑相关症状(GTAI-AR),以及作为次要变量的情绪调节策略(ERQ)和正念(MAAS),都在测试前、测试后和后续进行了评估。为了证实组内差异,计算了 Wilcoxon 检验,并使用 Hedges'g 作为效应大小(ES)的衡量标准。结果:在采用的三种测量方法中,主要变量的中度和重度TE差异显著。在次要变量中,只有认知再评价在前后期反映出显著(小)的效应量;在后期随访中,表达抑制是唯一反映出显著(中等)效应量的维度;在前期随访中,只有正念产生了相关(小)效应量。讨论:研究结果符合统一协议框架及其应用的当前研究。结论:希望这些结果有助于设计类似的干预措施。虽然这些结果令人鼓舞,但还需要进行更严格的研究以确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptación y desempeño psicométrico de la Escala de tormento físico y emocional hacia animales. Alta frecuencia de vulnerabilidad psicológica de población transgénero consultante a un hospital público de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Causas de abandono de un tratamiento ambulatorio intensivo por Trastorno por uso de sustancias. Perspectiva hacia el diseño de programas. Demencia con Cuerpos de Lewy y Afasias progresivas primarias: criterios diagnósticos actuales. Editorial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1