Efficacy of melatonin in decreasing the incidence of delirium in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-04-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240144-en
Anjishnujit Bandyopadhyay, Lakshmi Narayana Yaddanapudi, Vikas Saini, Neeru Sahni, Sandeep Grover, Sunaakshi Puri, Vighnesh Ashok
{"title":"Efficacy of melatonin in decreasing the incidence of delirium in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Anjishnujit Bandyopadhyay, Lakshmi Narayana Yaddanapudi, Vikas Saini, Neeru Sahni, Sandeep Grover, Sunaakshi Puri, Vighnesh Ashok","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240144-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether enteral melatonin decreases the incidence of delirium in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, adults were admitted to the intensive care unit and received either usual standard care alone (Control Group) or in combination with 3mg of enteral melatonin once a day at 9 PM (Melatonin Group). Concealment of allocation was done by serially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The intensivist assessing delirium and the investigator performing the data analysis were blinded to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 24 hours of the intensive care unit stay. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of delirium on Days 3 and 7, intensive care unit mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and Glasgow outcome score (at discharge).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 108 patients in the final analysis, with 54 patients in each group. At 24 hours of intensive care unit stay, there was no difference in the incidence of delirium between Melatonin and Control Groups (29.6 versus 46.2%; RR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.38 - 1.05; p = 0.11). No secondary outcome showed a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enteral melatonin 3mg is not more effective at decreasing the incidence of delirium than standard care is in critically ill adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240144en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240144-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether enteral melatonin decreases the incidence of delirium in critically ill adults.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, adults were admitted to the intensive care unit and received either usual standard care alone (Control Group) or in combination with 3mg of enteral melatonin once a day at 9 PM (Melatonin Group). Concealment of allocation was done by serially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The intensivist assessing delirium and the investigator performing the data analysis were blinded to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 24 hours of the intensive care unit stay. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of delirium on Days 3 and 7, intensive care unit mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and Glasgow outcome score (at discharge).

Results: We included 108 patients in the final analysis, with 54 patients in each group. At 24 hours of intensive care unit stay, there was no difference in the incidence of delirium between Melatonin and Control Groups (29.6 versus 46.2%; RR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.38 - 1.05; p = 0.11). No secondary outcome showed a statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: Enteral melatonin 3mg is not more effective at decreasing the incidence of delirium than standard care is in critically ill adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
褪黑素降低重症成人谵妄发生率的效果:随机对照试验。
目的确定肠内褪黑素是否能降低重症成人谵妄的发生率:在这项随机对照试验中,重症监护室收治的成人患者要么单独接受常规标准护理(对照组),要么在每天晚上 9 点同时接受 3 毫克褪黑素肠内注射(褪黑素组)。分配方法采用连续编号的不透明密封信封。对谵妄进行评估的重症监护医师和进行数据分析的研究人员对组别分配是双盲的。主要结果是重症监护病房住院 24 小时内的谵妄发生率。次要结果是第3天和第7天的谵妄发生率、重症监护室死亡率、重症监护室住院时间、机械通气时间和格拉斯哥结果评分(出院时):最终分析包括 108 名患者,每组 54 人。在重症监护室住院 24 小时时,褪黑素组和对照组的谵妄发生率没有差异(29.6% 对 46.2%;RR = 0.6;95%CI 0.38 - 1.05;P = 0.11)。没有任何次要结果显示出统计学上的显著差异:肠内褪黑素 3 毫克在降低重症成人谵妄的发生率方面并不比标准护理更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1