Measuring Patient-Reported Use and Outcomes From Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies: Development of the Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey.

IF 1.3 Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-04-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241241259
Stephanie L Taylor, A Rani Elwy, Barbara G Bokhour, Scott S Coggeshall, Amy Cohen, Claudia Der-Martirosian, Taona Haderlein, Jolie Haun, Benjamin Kligler, Alex T Kloehn, Karl A Lorenz, Briana Lott, Marlena H Shin, Tammy Schult, Joy Toyama, Alison M Whitehead, Xiaoyi Zhang, Steven B Zeliadt
{"title":"Measuring Patient-Reported Use and Outcomes From Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies: Development of the Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey.","authors":"Stephanie L Taylor, A Rani Elwy, Barbara G Bokhour, Scott S Coggeshall, Amy Cohen, Claudia Der-Martirosian, Taona Haderlein, Jolie Haun, Benjamin Kligler, Alex T Kloehn, Karl A Lorenz, Briana Lott, Marlena H Shin, Tammy Schult, Joy Toyama, Alison M Whitehead, Xiaoyi Zhang, Steven B Zeliadt","doi":"10.1177/27536130241241259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing the use and effectiveness of complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies via survey can be complicated given CIH therapies are used in various locations and formats, the dosing required to have an effect is unclear, the potential health and well-being outcomes are many, and describing CIH therapies can be challenging. Few surveys assessing CIH therapy use and effectiveness exist, and none sufficiently reflect these complexities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In a large-scale Veterans Health Administration (VA) quality improvement effort, we developed the \"Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey\", a longitudinal, electronic patient self-administered survey to comprehensively assess CIH therapy use and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained guidance from the literature, subject matter experts, and Veteran patients who used CIH therapies in designing the survey. As a validity check, we completed cognitive testing and interviews with those patients. We conducted the survey (March 2021-April 2023), inviting 15,608 Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain with a recent CIH appointment or referral identified in VA electronic medical records (EMR) to participate. As a second validity check, we compared VA EMR data and patient self-reports of CIH therapy utilization a month after survey initiation and again at survey conclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 64-item, electronic survey assesses CIH dosing (amount and timing), delivery format and location, provider location, and payor. It also assesses 7 patient-reported outcomes (pain, global mental health, global physical health, depression, quality of life, stress, and meaning/purpose in life), and 3 potential mediators (perceived health competency, healthcare engagement, and self-efficacy for managing diseases). The survey took 17 minutes on average to complete and had a baseline response rate of 45.3%. We found high degrees of concordance between self-reported and EMR data for all therapies except meditation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Validly assessing patient-reported CIH therapy use and outcomes is complex, but possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"13 ","pages":"27536130241241259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10998493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241241259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing the use and effectiveness of complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies via survey can be complicated given CIH therapies are used in various locations and formats, the dosing required to have an effect is unclear, the potential health and well-being outcomes are many, and describing CIH therapies can be challenging. Few surveys assessing CIH therapy use and effectiveness exist, and none sufficiently reflect these complexities.

Objective: In a large-scale Veterans Health Administration (VA) quality improvement effort, we developed the "Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey", a longitudinal, electronic patient self-administered survey to comprehensively assess CIH therapy use and outcomes.

Methods: We obtained guidance from the literature, subject matter experts, and Veteran patients who used CIH therapies in designing the survey. As a validity check, we completed cognitive testing and interviews with those patients. We conducted the survey (March 2021-April 2023), inviting 15,608 Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain with a recent CIH appointment or referral identified in VA electronic medical records (EMR) to participate. As a second validity check, we compared VA EMR data and patient self-reports of CIH therapy utilization a month after survey initiation and again at survey conclusion.

Results: The 64-item, electronic survey assesses CIH dosing (amount and timing), delivery format and location, provider location, and payor. It also assesses 7 patient-reported outcomes (pain, global mental health, global physical health, depression, quality of life, stress, and meaning/purpose in life), and 3 potential mediators (perceived health competency, healthcare engagement, and self-efficacy for managing diseases). The survey took 17 minutes on average to complete and had a baseline response rate of 45.3%. We found high degrees of concordance between self-reported and EMR data for all therapies except meditation.

Conclusions: Validly assessing patient-reported CIH therapy use and outcomes is complex, but possible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量补充和综合健康疗法的患者报告使用情况和结果:开发补充和综合健康疗法患者体验调查。
背景:通过调查评估补充和综合保健疗法(CIH)的使用情况和效果可能会很复杂,因为CIH疗法的使用地点和形式各不相同,产生效果所需的剂量也不明确,潜在的健康和福利结果也很多,而且描述CIH疗法也很困难。目前很少有对 CIH 疗法的使用情况和效果进行评估的调查,而且没有一项调查能充分反映这些复杂性:在退伍军人健康管理局(VA)的一项大规模质量改进工作中,我们开发了 "补充和综合健康疗法患者体验调查",这是一项纵向、电子化的患者自填调查,旨在全面评估 CIH 疗法的使用情况和效果:在设计调查时,我们从文献、主题专家和使用过 CIH 疗法的退伍军人患者那里获得了指导。作为有效性检查,我们完成了对这些患者的认知测试和访谈。我们开展了调查(2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 4 月),邀请了 15,608 名患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛并在退伍军人事务部电子病历 (EMR) 中确认近期接受过 CIH 预约或转诊的退伍军人参与调查。作为第二次有效性检查,我们对退伍军人电子病历数据和患者自我报告的 CIH 治疗使用情况进行了比较,并在调查开始一个月后和调查结束时再次进行了比较:这项由 64 个项目组成的电子调查对 CIH 剂量(量和时间)、给药形式和地点、提供者地点和付款者进行了评估。它还评估了 7 项患者报告结果(疼痛、整体心理健康、整体身体健康、抑郁、生活质量、压力和生活意义/目的)和 3 项潜在中介因素(感知健康能力、医疗保健参与度和管理疾病的自我效能)。完成调查平均需要 17 分钟,基线回复率为 45.3%。我们发现,除冥想外,所有疗法的自我报告数据与 EMR 数据高度一致:对患者报告的 CIH 疗法使用情况和结果进行有效评估虽然复杂,但却是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Dysregulation to Coherence: Exploring the HeartMath® Approach to Emotional and Physiological Regulation. Teaching Cancer Survivors Coping Skills for Managing Fear of Recurrence: Insights From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Preferences for and Experiences With Yoga in Appalachian Veterans: A Mixed Method Study. A Brief Mindfulness Skills Course for University Employees is Feasible and Effective: Changes in Perceived Stress, Mindfulness, Relational Well-Being, and Workplace Performance. Patient Reports on How Well Combining Provider-Delivered and Self-Directed Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies Help Their Health and Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1