Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Inequalities in Infertility Prevalence, Help-Seeking, and Help Received Since 1995

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.03.005
{"title":"Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Inequalities in Infertility Prevalence, Help-Seeking, and Help Received Since 1995","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the United States, infertility and treatment for infertility are marked by racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities. Simultaneously, biomedical advances and increased public health attention toward preventing and addressing infertility have grown. It is not known, however, whether the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities observed in infertility prevalence, help-seeking, or help received have changed over time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Using National Survey of Family Growth data (1995 through 2017–2019 cycles), this study applied multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms to investigate whether and how racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in 1) the prevalence of infertility, 2) ever seeking help to become pregnant, and 3) use of common types of medical help (advice, testing, medication for </span>ovulation, surgery for blocked tubes, and artificial insemination) have changed over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed persisting, rather than narrowing or increasing, inequalities in the prevalence of infertility and help-seeking overall. The results showed persisting racial/ethnic inequalities in testing, ovulation medication use, and surgery for blocked tubes. By contrast, the results showed widening socioeconomic inequalities in testing and narrowing inequalities in the use of ovulation medications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is little evidence to suggest policy interventions, biomedical advances, or increased public health awareness has narrowed inequalities in infertility prevalence, treatment seeking, or use of specific treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 401-408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724000252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the United States, infertility and treatment for infertility are marked by racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities. Simultaneously, biomedical advances and increased public health attention toward preventing and addressing infertility have grown. It is not known, however, whether the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities observed in infertility prevalence, help-seeking, or help received have changed over time.

Methods

Using National Survey of Family Growth data (1995 through 2017–2019 cycles), this study applied multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms to investigate whether and how racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in 1) the prevalence of infertility, 2) ever seeking help to become pregnant, and 3) use of common types of medical help (advice, testing, medication for ovulation, surgery for blocked tubes, and artificial insemination) have changed over time.

Results

The results showed persisting, rather than narrowing or increasing, inequalities in the prevalence of infertility and help-seeking overall. The results showed persisting racial/ethnic inequalities in testing, ovulation medication use, and surgery for blocked tubes. By contrast, the results showed widening socioeconomic inequalities in testing and narrowing inequalities in the use of ovulation medications.

Conclusions

There is little evidence to suggest policy interventions, biomedical advances, or increased public health awareness has narrowed inequalities in infertility prevalence, treatment seeking, or use of specific treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自 1995 年以来,不孕症患病率、寻求帮助和获得帮助方面的社会经济和种族/族裔不平等现象。
背景:在美国,不孕不育症和不孕不育症的治疗存在种族/族裔和社会经济方面的不平等。与此同时,生物医学的进步以及公众对预防和解决不孕不育问题的关注也在不断增加。然而,在不孕症发病率、寻求帮助或获得帮助方面观察到的种族/民族和社会经济不平等现象是否随着时间的推移而发生了变化,目前尚不得而知:本研究利用全国家庭成长调查数据(1995 年至 2017-2019 年周期),采用带交互项的多变量逻辑回归,调查种族/民族和社会经济在以下方面的不平等是否以及如何随着时间的推移而发生变化:1)不孕症患病率;2)曾经寻求怀孕帮助;3)使用常见类型的医疗帮助(建议、检测、排卵药物、输卵管堵塞手术和人工授精):结果:结果表明,在不孕症的发病率和寻求帮助的总体情况下,不平等现象持续存在,而不是缩小或增加。结果表明,在检测、排卵药物使用和输卵管堵塞手术方面,种族/民族间的不平等持续存在。相比之下,结果显示在检测方面的社会经济不平等在扩大,在使用排卵药物方面的不平等在缩小:几乎没有证据表明,政策干预、生物医学进步或公众健康意识的提高缩小了不孕症患病率、寻求治疗或使用特定治疗方法方面的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
"Just Google It"-A Qualitative Study of Reproductive-Age Women's Stigmatizing Experiences When Accessing Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder. Abortion Provision at New York State Regional Perinatal Centers Following Implementation of the Reproductive Health Act. Community-dwelling Black Women's Experiences With Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study. "Neither Side Really Knows… What an Abortion Is Like": A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Experiences With Second-Trimester Procedural Abortions. Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1