Comparative efficacy of pre-operative and post-operative administration of amoxicillin in third molar extraction surgery - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_163_22
Tapasya V Karemore, Kanchan A Ashtankar, Mukta Motwani
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of pre-operative and post-operative administration of amoxicillin in third molar extraction surgery - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tapasya V Karemore, Kanchan A Ashtankar, Mukta Motwani","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_163_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the effectiveness of pre-operative and post-operative administration of amoxicillin in patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. A systematic search was executed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies published till December 2021. Studies were included based on the pre-eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The heterogeneity was evaluated, and a random effect model was used for meta-analysis. A total of five studies were included from an initial search of 96 studies. The included studies were randomized controlled trials and comparative studies assessing pre-operative and post-operative administration of antibiotics among patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. For comparison between pre-operative and post-operative groups, interincisal distance, complications, pain, and swelling were systematically reviewed and meta-analysis was done for interincisal distance and complications. The mean change in interincisal distance ranged from 5.5 to 47.9 and from 4.56 to 46.1 in the pre-operative and post-operative amoxicillin groups, respectively. Complications reported were infections, alveolar osteitis, nausea, diarrhea, gastric pain, rash, and headache with a pooled incidence of 4.3-33% in the pre-operative amoxicillin group and 0-22.7% in the post-operative amoxicillin group. Quantitative synthesis of data carried out from meta-analysis shows a significant difference in the pre-operative and post-operative amoxicillin groups in improving the interincisal distance and incidence of complications post surgery. The qualitative synthesis of data derived from systematic review for pain provides favoring results for post-operative amoxicillin administration. In case of swelling, a non-conclusive result was obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_163_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of pre-operative and post-operative administration of amoxicillin in patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. A systematic search was executed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies published till December 2021. Studies were included based on the pre-eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The heterogeneity was evaluated, and a random effect model was used for meta-analysis. A total of five studies were included from an initial search of 96 studies. The included studies were randomized controlled trials and comparative studies assessing pre-operative and post-operative administration of antibiotics among patients undergoing third molar extraction surgery. For comparison between pre-operative and post-operative groups, interincisal distance, complications, pain, and swelling were systematically reviewed and meta-analysis was done for interincisal distance and complications. The mean change in interincisal distance ranged from 5.5 to 47.9 and from 4.56 to 46.1 in the pre-operative and post-operative amoxicillin groups, respectively. Complications reported were infections, alveolar osteitis, nausea, diarrhea, gastric pain, rash, and headache with a pooled incidence of 4.3-33% in the pre-operative amoxicillin group and 0-22.7% in the post-operative amoxicillin group. Quantitative synthesis of data carried out from meta-analysis shows a significant difference in the pre-operative and post-operative amoxicillin groups in improving the interincisal distance and incidence of complications post surgery. The qualitative synthesis of data derived from systematic review for pain provides favoring results for post-operative amoxicillin administration. In case of swelling, a non-conclusive result was obtained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三磨牙拔除手术术前和术后使用阿莫西林的疗效比较 - 系统综述和荟萃分析。
比较第三磨牙拔除手术患者术前和术后服用阿莫西林的效果。根据 PRISMA 指南,对 2021 年 12 月之前发表的研究进行了系统检索。根据资格预审标准纳入了相关研究。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了偏倚风险。对异质性进行评估,并采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。在最初搜索的 96 项研究中,共纳入了 5 项研究。纳入的研究均为随机对照试验和比较研究,评估了第三磨牙拔除手术患者术前和术后使用抗生素的情况。为了比较术前组和术后组的情况,我们对患者的齿间距离、并发症、疼痛和肿胀进行了系统回顾,并对齿间距离和并发症进行了荟萃分析。术前和术后阿莫西林组的平均齿间距离变化范围分别为 5.5 至 47.9 和 4.56 至 46.1。并发症包括感染、牙槽骨炎、恶心、腹泻、胃痛、皮疹和头痛,术前阿莫西林组的总发生率为 4.3%-33%,术后阿莫西林组的总发生率为 0%-22.7%。对荟萃分析数据的定量综合显示,术前和术后阿莫西林组在改善incisal间距和术后并发症发生率方面存在显著差异。对系统综述中有关疼痛的数据进行的定性综合结果显示,术后使用阿莫西林是有效的。至于肿胀,则没有得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns and characteristics of maxillofacial trauma among children and adolescents: A Bi-institutional retrospective study. Presence of antilingula and its relationship to mandibular foramen-An anatomical study. Primary non-radiation induced angiosarcoma of the parotid with epithelioid morphology. Radiation effects in head and neck and role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: An adjunct to management. The surgical outcome of sutureless skin closures using Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond™) versus Steri-Strip™.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1