Detection method for unrecognized spatial disorientation based on optical flow stimuli.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Technology and Health Care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/THC-248030
Chenru Hao, Rui Su, Chunnan Dong, Jingjing Zhang, Ziqiang Chi, Fanzhen Meng, Ruibin Zhao, Yanru Wu, Linlin Wang, Pengfei Li, Chengwei Chen, Qingjie Lian, Li Cheng
{"title":"Detection method for unrecognized spatial disorientation based on optical flow stimuli.","authors":"Chenru Hao, Rui Su, Chunnan Dong, Jingjing Zhang, Ziqiang Chi, Fanzhen Meng, Ruibin Zhao, Yanru Wu, Linlin Wang, Pengfei Li, Chengwei Chen, Qingjie Lian, Li Cheng","doi":"10.3233/THC-248030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flight accidents caused by spatial disorientation (SD) greatly affect flight safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Few studies have been devoted to the evaluation of SD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 pilots and 10 non-pilots were recruited for the experimental induction of SD. Videos for giving optical flow stimuli were played at two different flow speeds to induce SD. Subjective judgment and center of foot pressure (CoP) data were collected from the tests. The data were combined to determine the occurrence of SD and analyze the SD types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of self-reported SD events was slightly smaller in the pilots than in the non-pilots. The average upper bound of the confidence interval for the standard deviation of CoP was 0.32 ± 0.09 cm and 0.38 ± 0.12 cm in the pilots and non-pilots, respectively. This indicator was significantly lower in the pilots than in the non-pilots (P= 0.03). The success rate of the experimental induction of unrecognized SD was 26.7% and 45.0% in the pilots and non-pilots, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The method offered a new to analyze unrecognized SD. We could determine the occurrence unrecognized SD. This is an essential means of reducing flight accidents caused by unrecognized SD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"339-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-248030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flight accidents caused by spatial disorientation (SD) greatly affect flight safety.

Objective: Few studies have been devoted to the evaluation of SD.

Methods: 10 pilots and 10 non-pilots were recruited for the experimental induction of SD. Videos for giving optical flow stimuli were played at two different flow speeds to induce SD. Subjective judgment and center of foot pressure (CoP) data were collected from the tests. The data were combined to determine the occurrence of SD and analyze the SD types.

Results: The number of self-reported SD events was slightly smaller in the pilots than in the non-pilots. The average upper bound of the confidence interval for the standard deviation of CoP was 0.32 ± 0.09 cm and 0.38 ± 0.12 cm in the pilots and non-pilots, respectively. This indicator was significantly lower in the pilots than in the non-pilots (P= 0.03). The success rate of the experimental induction of unrecognized SD was 26.7% and 45.0% in the pilots and non-pilots, respectively.

Conclusion: The method offered a new to analyze unrecognized SD. We could determine the occurrence unrecognized SD. This is an essential means of reducing flight accidents caused by unrecognized SD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于光流刺激的未识别空间迷失检测方法。
背景由空间定向障碍(SD)引起的飞行事故对飞行安全有很大影响:方法:招募 10 名飞行员和 10 名非飞行员进行 SD 诱导实验。方法:招募 10 名飞行员和 10 名非飞行员进行诱导 SD 的实验,以两种不同的流速播放给予光流刺激的视频,诱导 SD。从测试中收集主观判断和脚心压力(CoP)数据。综合这些数据来确定自毁现象的发生率并分析自毁类型:结果:飞行员自我报告的 SD 事件数量略少于非飞行员。飞行员和非飞行员的 CoP 标准偏差置信区间平均上限分别为 0.32 ± 0.09 厘米和 0.38 ± 0.12 厘米。飞行员的这一指标明显低于非飞行员(P= 0.03)。飞行员和非飞行员实验诱导未识别 SD 的成功率分别为 26.7% 和 45.0%:结论:该方法为分析未识别自毁提供了一种新方法。我们可以确定未识别自毁的发生率。这是减少因未识别自毁而导致飞行事故的重要手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
期刊最新文献
Predicting one-year mortality risk in ICU patients with ischemic stroke using multi-algorithm machine learning and a nomogram. Deciphering atrial repolarization morphology: A spline interpolation framework for atrial arrhythmia diagnosis. Comparing kinematic and kinetic demands on the knee joint during selected physiotherapy exercises and activities of daily living. Structural determinants of effective academic-industry technology transfer in biomedical engineering. Effectiveness of KAP-based nursing program in managing digestive symptoms in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A retrospective controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1