Increasing equity in science requires better ethics training: A course by trainees, for trainees.

IF 11.1 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Cell genomics Pub Date : 2024-05-08 Epub Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100554
Roshni A Patel, Rachel A Ungar, Alanna L Pyke, Alvina Adimoelja, Meenakshi Chakraborty, Daniel J Cotter, Malika Freund, Pagé Goddard, Justin Gomez-Stafford, Emily Greenwald, Emily Higgs, Naiomi Hunter, Tim M G MacKenzie, Anjali Narain, Tamara Gjorgjieva, Daphne O Martschenko
{"title":"Increasing equity in science requires better ethics training: A course by trainees, for trainees.","authors":"Roshni A Patel, Rachel A Ungar, Alanna L Pyke, Alvina Adimoelja, Meenakshi Chakraborty, Daniel J Cotter, Malika Freund, Pagé Goddard, Justin Gomez-Stafford, Emily Greenwald, Emily Higgs, Naiomi Hunter, Tim M G MacKenzie, Anjali Narain, Tamara Gjorgjieva, Daphne O Martschenko","doi":"10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the profound impacts of scientific research, few scientists have received the necessary training to productively discuss the ethical and societal implications of their work. To address this critical gap, we-a group of predominantly human genetics trainees-developed a course on genetics, ethics, and society. We intend for this course to serve as a template for other institutions and scientific disciplines. Our curriculum positions human genetics within its historical and societal context and encourages students to evaluate how societal norms and structures impact the conduct of scientific research. We demonstrate the utility of this course via surveys of enrolled students and provide resources and strategies for others hoping to teach a similar course. We conclude by arguing that if we are to work toward rectifying the inequities and injustices produced by our field, we must first learn to view our own research as impacting and being impacted by society.</p>","PeriodicalId":72539,"journal":{"name":"Cell genomics","volume":" ","pages":"100554"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the profound impacts of scientific research, few scientists have received the necessary training to productively discuss the ethical and societal implications of their work. To address this critical gap, we-a group of predominantly human genetics trainees-developed a course on genetics, ethics, and society. We intend for this course to serve as a template for other institutions and scientific disciplines. Our curriculum positions human genetics within its historical and societal context and encourages students to evaluate how societal norms and structures impact the conduct of scientific research. We demonstrate the utility of this course via surveys of enrolled students and provide resources and strategies for others hoping to teach a similar course. We conclude by arguing that if we are to work toward rectifying the inequities and injustices produced by our field, we must first learn to view our own research as impacting and being impacted by society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高科学领域的公平性需要更好的伦理培训:学员为学员开设的课程。
尽管科学研究影响深远,但很少有科学家接受过必要的培训,以富有成效地讨论其工作的伦理和社会影响。为了弥补这一重大差距,我们--一群主要由人类遗传学学员组成的团队--开发了一门关于遗传学、伦理学和社会的课程。我们打算将这门课程作为其他机构和科学学科的模板。我们的课程将人类遗传学置于历史和社会背景之中,鼓励学生评估社会规范和结构如何影响科学研究的开展。我们通过对注册学生的调查证明了这门课程的实用性,并为其他希望教授类似课程的人提供了资源和策略。最后,我们认为,如果我们要努力纠正我们的领域所产生的不公平和不公正现象,我们必须首先学会将我们自己的研究视为影响社会和被社会影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A combined deep learning framework for mammalian m6A site prediction. Analysis of single-cell CRISPR perturbations indicates that enhancers predominantly act multiplicatively. Complex structural variation is prevalent and highly pathogenic in pediatric solid tumors. Gene regulatory network inference from CRISPR perturbations in primary CD4+ T cells elucidates the genomic basis of immune disease. Leveraging genomes to support conservation and bioeconomy policies in a megadiverse country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1