Deciphering the Timing and Impact of Life-extending Interventions: Temporal Efficacy Profiler Distinguishes Early, Midlife, and Senescence Phase Efficacies.

Nisi Jiang, Catherine J Cheng, Qianqian Liu, Randy Strong, Jonathan Gelfond, James F Nelson
{"title":"Deciphering the Timing and Impact of Life-extending Interventions: Temporal Efficacy Profiler Distinguishes Early, Midlife, and Senescence Phase Efficacies.","authors":"Nisi Jiang, Catherine J Cheng, Qianqian Liu, Randy Strong, Jonathan Gelfond, James F Nelson","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.27.585737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence that life-extending interventions are not uniformly effective across the lifespan calls for an analytic tool that can estimate age-specific treatment effects on mortality hazards. Here we report such a tool, applying it to mouse data from 42 compounds tested in the NIA Interventions Testing Program. This tool identified agents that either reduced (22) or increased (15) mortality hazards or did both (2) in at least one sex, most with marked variation in the duration of efficacy and magnitude of effect size. Only 8 reduced mortality hazards after 90% mortality, when the burden of senescence is the greatest. Sex differences were common. This new analytic tool complements the commonly used log-rank test. It detects more potential life-extending candidates (22 versus 10) and indicates when during the life course they are effective. It also uncovers adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.27.585737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence that life-extending interventions are not uniformly effective across the lifespan calls for an analytic tool that can estimate age-specific treatment effects on mortality hazards. Here we report such a tool, applying it to mouse data from 42 compounds tested in the NIA Interventions Testing Program. This tool identified agents that either reduced (22) or increased (15) mortality hazards or did both (2) in at least one sex, most with marked variation in the duration of efficacy and magnitude of effect size. Only 8 reduced mortality hazards after 90% mortality, when the burden of senescence is the greatest. Sex differences were common. This new analytic tool complements the commonly used log-rank test. It detects more potential life-extending candidates (22 versus 10) and indicates when during the life course they are effective. It also uncovers adverse effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解密延寿药物的时机和影响:区分早期、中期和衰老期药效的新分析方法
有证据表明,延长生命的干预措施在人的一生中并不是一致有效的,这就需要一种分析工具来估算特定年龄的治疗对死亡率危害的影响。在此,我们报告了这样一种工具,并将其应用于国家卫生研究院干预测试计划中测试的 42 种药物的小鼠数据。该工具确定了降低(22 种)或增加(16 种)死亡率危害或两者兼有(6 种)的药物,所有药物的疗效持续时间和效应大小都有明显差异。只有 7 种药物在 90% 死亡率之后降低了死亡率危害,而此时衰老的负担最大。在所有参数中,性别差异都很明显。这一新的分析工具是对常用的对数秩检验的补充。它能发现更多潜在的延长寿命候选药物(22 种对 10 种),并指出这些药物在生命过程中何时有效。它还能发现不良反应。最重要的是,它能识别出在生命衰老期能特别降低死亡率的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-supervised segmentation and characterization of fiber bundles in anatomic tracing data. Single neuron contributions to the auditory brainstem EEG. Neural substrates of cold nociception in Drosophila larva. Inversions Can Accumulate Balanced Sexual Antagonism: Evidence from Simulations and Drosophila Experiments. Programming megakaryocytes to produce engineered platelets for delivering non-native proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1