Intravenous cefuroxime as a first-line treatment for women hospitalized for pyelonephritis.

IF 3.3 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae071
Céline Everard, Axelle Schampaert, Louise Doyen, Valérie Verbelen, Jean-Christophe Marot, Grégoire Wieërs
{"title":"Intravenous cefuroxime as a first-line treatment for women hospitalized for pyelonephritis.","authors":"Céline Everard, Axelle Schampaert, Louise Doyen, Valérie Verbelen, Jean-Christophe Marot, Grégoire Wieërs","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empirical treatment of pyelonephritis in the emergency ward includes broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such a strategy favours broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse. Local antibiotic stewardship teams can propose local recommendations to adapt empirical antibiotic treatment devoted to spare precious molecules that remain active on MDR bacteria, such as fluoroquinolones or other broad-spectrum antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence within 3 months after hospital discharge following empirical antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime in women with pyelonephritis in the emergency room.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study. We identified 109 women treated for pyelonephritis, 95 with cefuroxime at any time, and 14 with only other antibiotics, and divided them into subgroups based on antibiotic switch to other molecules. We compared the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence in the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group of patients treated with cefuroxime only, we identified five cases of recurrence (9.4%) in a total of 53 patients, but only 1 (1.9%) case of recurrence associated with the same uropathogen. No significant difference in clinical outcome, length of antibiotic treatment, or urinary tract infection recurrence was observed between the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study supports that a strategy elaborated by an antibiotic stewardship team based on local ecology and aimed at proposing the narrowest-spectrum antibiotic upon treatment initiation in the emergency room is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 3","pages":"dlae071"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Empirical treatment of pyelonephritis in the emergency ward includes broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such a strategy favours broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse. Local antibiotic stewardship teams can propose local recommendations to adapt empirical antibiotic treatment devoted to spare precious molecules that remain active on MDR bacteria, such as fluoroquinolones or other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence within 3 months after hospital discharge following empirical antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime in women with pyelonephritis in the emergency room.

Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study. We identified 109 women treated for pyelonephritis, 95 with cefuroxime at any time, and 14 with only other antibiotics, and divided them into subgroups based on antibiotic switch to other molecules. We compared the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence in the subgroups.

Results: In the group of patients treated with cefuroxime only, we identified five cases of recurrence (9.4%) in a total of 53 patients, but only 1 (1.9%) case of recurrence associated with the same uropathogen. No significant difference in clinical outcome, length of antibiotic treatment, or urinary tract infection recurrence was observed between the subgroups.

Conclusions: Our study supports that a strategy elaborated by an antibiotic stewardship team based on local ecology and aimed at proposing the narrowest-spectrum antibiotic upon treatment initiation in the emergency room is safe.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射头孢呋辛作为妇女肾盂肾炎住院治疗的一线疗法。
背景:急诊室对肾盂肾炎的经验性治疗包括广谱抗生素。这种策略有利于广谱抗生素的过度使用。地方抗生素监管团队可提出地方性建议,调整经验性抗生素治疗,以保留对 MDR 细菌仍有活性的珍贵分子,如氟喹诺酮类或其他广谱抗生素:我们的目的是评估急诊室肾盂肾炎女性患者在使用头孢呋辛经验性抗生素治疗后,出院后 3 个月内尿路感染复发的发生率:我们进行了一项回顾性单中心研究。我们确定了 109 名接受肾盂肾炎治疗的妇女,其中 95 人在任何时候都使用了头孢呋辛,14 人仅使用了其他抗生素,并根据抗生素转换为其他分子的情况将她们分为几个亚组。我们比较了各分组的尿路感染复发率:结果:在仅使用头孢呋辛治疗的患者组中,我们在总共 53 例患者中发现了 5 例(9.4%)复发病例,但只有 1 例(1.9%)复发病例与相同的尿路病原体有关。亚组之间在临床结果、抗生素治疗时间或尿路感染复发方面没有明显差异:我们的研究证明,由抗生素管理团队根据当地生态学制定的策略是安全的,其目的是在急诊室开始治疗时建议使用最窄谱抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of commercially available premixed daptomycin preparations against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. bloodstream infections using Monte Carlo simulation in adult patients. Management of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in France: a real-world study. Knowledge mobilization and assessment of implementation of an updated national antimicrobial prescribing and stewardship competency framework. Antibiotic prescriptions to preschool children with respiratory tract infections in primary healthcare. An improved algorithm to screen for carbapenemase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1