Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health. Misuse or overuse of antimicrobials contributes to the emergence of AMR. Data on antimicrobial prescribing represent the cornerstone for guiding antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This study aimed to assess the use, indications, classification, and quality indicators of antimicrobials prescribed to patients in four tertiary hospitals in Niger.
Methods: This cross-sectional study used the methodology for Global Point Prevalence Surveys in tertiary hospitals between January and April 2024. Hospital records of all inpatients on admission at 08:00 hours on a specific day were reviewed for antimicrobial use during the survey.
Results: The overall prevalence of antibiotic use across hospitals was 54.5% (n = 470/862), ranging between 66.2% (n = 149/234) and 44.3% (n = 183/258). Most antibiotics used were antibacterials (89.0%, n = 637). Third-generation cephalosporins (48.2%, 307/637), imidazole derivatives (14.7%, 105/716), penicillins with extended spectrum (9.6%, 69/716), and fluoroquinolones (6.1%, 44/716) were the most commonly prescribed classes of antibiotics. Most antibiotics (84.9%, n = 608) were prescribed to treat community-acquired infections, while surgical prophylaxis accounted for 6.4% (n = 47/716). Most antibiotics (96.1%; n = 688/716) were used empirically, and less than a quarter (20.7%) of antibiotics prescribed had a documented stop/review date recorded. Only, 4.2% (n = 31/716) of prescribed antibiotics had cultures and susceptibility testing requested.
Conclusion: This study shows that antibiotic prescription rates are high in tertiary hospitals, with relatively high use of third-generation cephalosporins. Most antibiotics were empirically used and not guided by culture and susceptibility testing. These results could be the subject of key interventions for hospital antibiotic stewardship strategies in Niger.
{"title":"Antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients: a point prevalence survey across four tertiary hospitals in Niger.","authors":"Ounoussa Tapha, Cyriaque Comlan Degbey, Abdourahamane Yacouba, Espère Mahouna Tchioundjro, N'Kpingou Théodore Nadakou, Ibrahim Alkassoum Salifou, Sahada Moussa Saley, Mamane Daou, Souleymane Brah, Eric Omar Adehossi, Antoine Vikkey Hinson, Saidou Mamadou","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae175","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health. Misuse or overuse of antimicrobials contributes to the emergence of AMR. Data on antimicrobial prescribing represent the cornerstone for guiding antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This study aimed to assess the use, indications, classification, and quality indicators of antimicrobials prescribed to patients in four tertiary hospitals in Niger.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the methodology for Global Point Prevalence Surveys in tertiary hospitals between January and April 2024. Hospital records of all inpatients on admission at 08:00 hours on a specific day were reviewed for antimicrobial use during the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of antibiotic use across hospitals was 54.5% (<i>n</i> = 470/862), ranging between 66.2% (<i>n</i> = 149/234) and 44.3% (<i>n</i> = 183/258). Most antibiotics used were antibacterials (89.0%, <i>n</i> = 637). Third-generation cephalosporins (48.2%, 307/637), imidazole derivatives (14.7%, 105/716), penicillins with extended spectrum (9.6%, 69/716), and fluoroquinolones (6.1%, 44/716) were the most commonly prescribed classes of antibiotics. Most antibiotics (84.9%, <i>n</i> = 608) were prescribed to treat community-acquired infections, while surgical prophylaxis accounted for 6.4% (<i>n</i> = 47/716). Most antibiotics (96.1%; <i>n</i> = 688/716) were used empirically, and less than a quarter (20.7%) of antibiotics prescribed had a documented stop/review date recorded. Only, 4.2% (<i>n</i> = 31/716) of prescribed antibiotics had cultures and susceptibility testing requested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that antibiotic prescription rates are high in tertiary hospitals, with relatively high use of third-generation cephalosporins. Most antibiotics were empirically used and not guided by culture and susceptibility testing. These results could be the subject of key interventions for hospital antibiotic stewardship strategies in Niger.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523492/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae176
Webrod Mufwambi, Kunda Musuku, Jimmy Hangoma, Ngoni Veddie Muzondo, Larry Mweetwa, Steward Mudenda
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes have been implemented around the world to optimally manage antimicrobial use to attenuate antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study assessed the knowledge and practices of community pharmacists towards AMS strategies in the Lusaka District, Zambia.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 194 community pharmacists in the Lusaka district using a structured questionnaire from August 2022 to September 2022. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0.
Results: Of the 194 participants, 86% of the community pharmacists had good knowledge of AMS. The present study found that 83.5% were aware of AMS strategies used in community pharmacy practice. Further, 83.5% of the CPs were familiar with the goals of AMS and 89.2% believed that AMS was necessary for their pharmacy practice. Furthermore, 66.7% of the participants exhibited good practice towards the AMS strategies. Finally, 61.3% frequently avoided the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials that were not necessary.
Conclusions: According to the findings of this study, the majority of community pharmacists had good knowledge of the AMS strategies that were employed to combat AMR; nonetheless, some of them had poor practices. Therefore, there is a need for community pharmacists to have access to sufficient ongoing professional development programmes and educational activities through AMS programmes to address AMR.
{"title":"Community pharmacists' knowledge and practices towards antimicrobial stewardship: findings and implications.","authors":"Webrod Mufwambi, Kunda Musuku, Jimmy Hangoma, Ngoni Veddie Muzondo, Larry Mweetwa, Steward Mudenda","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes have been implemented around the world to optimally manage antimicrobial use to attenuate antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study assessed the knowledge and practices of community pharmacists towards AMS strategies in the Lusaka District, Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among 194 community pharmacists in the Lusaka district using a structured questionnaire from August 2022 to September 2022. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 194 participants, 86% of the community pharmacists had good knowledge of AMS. The present study found that 83.5% were aware of AMS strategies used in community pharmacy practice. Further, 83.5% of the CPs were familiar with the goals of AMS and 89.2% believed that AMS was necessary for their pharmacy practice. Furthermore, 66.7% of the participants exhibited good practice towards the AMS strategies. Finally, 61.3% frequently avoided the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials that were not necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the findings of this study, the majority of community pharmacists had good knowledge of the AMS strategies that were employed to combat AMR; nonetheless, some of them had poor practices. Therefore, there is a need for community pharmacists to have access to sufficient ongoing professional development programmes and educational activities through AMS programmes to address AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521336/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-29eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae173
Kaushik Puranam, Meagan Harrington, Edwards Kasonkanji, Gerald Tegha, Maria J Chikasema, Mena L Chawinga, Maganizo B Chagomerana, Robert Krysiak, Satish Gopal, David van Duin, Melissa B Miller, Matthew S Painschab
Objectives: To evaluate causes of fever, including resistance patterns, in patients undergoing cancer treatment in Malawi.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, enrolled patients undergoing chemotherapy at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi were given a thermometer. If a temperature of ≥38°C was recorded, they were instructed to return for hospitalization, standardized fever workup, and antibiotics. All patients were followed through 90 days post-fever event or completion of chemotherapy.
Results: One hundred and five patients were screened and 50 were enrolled. Of the enrollees, 26 (52%) were men and 26 (52%) were HIV positive, with a mean ART duration of 7 years and CD4 count of 293 cells/µL. The most common diagnoses were aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (40%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (22%). Twenty-three febrile events were recorded from 15 patients. Of the 23 events, a causative agent was isolated in 13 cases: Escherichia coli (6), Plasmodium falciparum (3), Streptococcus pneumoniae (2), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1) and Citrobacter freundii (1). Of the six E. coli isolates, all were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones and 4/6 (66%) were resistant to cephalosporins. All patients but one survived; the death was attributed to Pseudomonas bacteraemia.
Conclusions: This study describes laboratory-confirmed causes of neutropenic fever (NF) in cancer patients in Malawi. Gram-negative rods, followed by malaria, were the most common source of infection. Gram-negative rods were associated with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. Malaria and resistant bacterial infections should be considered for NF treatment and prevention in sub-Saharan Africa.
{"title":"Aetiology, susceptibility and outcomes of fever in patients receiving chemotherapy in Malawi: a prospective study.","authors":"Kaushik Puranam, Meagan Harrington, Edwards Kasonkanji, Gerald Tegha, Maria J Chikasema, Mena L Chawinga, Maganizo B Chagomerana, Robert Krysiak, Satish Gopal, David van Duin, Melissa B Miller, Matthew S Painschab","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae173","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate causes of fever, including resistance patterns, in patients undergoing cancer treatment in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, enrolled patients undergoing chemotherapy at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi were given a thermometer. If a temperature of ≥38°C was recorded, they were instructed to return for hospitalization, standardized fever workup, and antibiotics. All patients were followed through 90 days post-fever event or completion of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and five patients were screened and 50 were enrolled. Of the enrollees, 26 (52%) were men and 26 (52%) were HIV positive, with a mean ART duration of 7 years and CD4 count of 293 cells/µL. The most common diagnoses were aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (40%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (22%). Twenty-three febrile events were recorded from 15 patients. Of the 23 events, a causative agent was isolated in 13 cases: <i>Escherichia coli</i> (6), <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> (3), <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> (2), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (1) and <i>Citrobacter freundii</i> (1). Of the six <i>E. coli</i> isolates, all were found to be resistant to fluoroquinolones and 4/6 (66%) were resistant to cephalosporins. All patients but one survived; the death was attributed to <i>Pseudomonas</i> bacteraemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes laboratory-confirmed causes of neutropenic fever (NF) in cancer patients in Malawi. Gram-negative rods, followed by malaria, were the most common source of infection. Gram-negative rods were associated with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. Malaria and resistant bacterial infections should be considered for NF treatment and prevention in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae157
Teagan L King, Elissa Rennert-May, Ranjani Somayaji, Jenine Leal, Jason E Black, John M Conly, Daniel Gregson
Objectives: We evaluated the costs of susceptible and resistant Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) in adults. Secondary outcomes were the impact of BSI on length of stay (LOS), readmissions and death.
Methods: We examined a population-based retrospective cohort of blood cultures from 2011 to 2018 in Calgary, Canada, linked to microcosting and gross costing data. Propensity score matching was completed, and costs were compared between no BSI and E. coli BSI over 90 days using linear regression.
Results: A total of 4581 BSIs in 89 673 adults experienced E. coli bacteraemia during the study period. The mean cost of an E. coli BSI at 90 days was $39 072 (SD: $95 747) in adults. Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) E. coli, resistant to fluoroquinolones (FQ) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, compared with susceptible E. coli BSI resulted in the greatest mean cost at $53 899 and the highest odds of readmission, increased LOS, and death.
Conclusions: E. coli BSI is associated with substantial costs. Total cost differences were highest in those with CRO-R E. coli with resistance to FQ and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Over the study period, bacteraemia secondary to these strains alone, added over $9 million to costs for healthcare in the Calgary Zone.
{"title":"Evaluating the costs of <i>Escherichia coli</i> bloodstream infections: a population-based cohort study in a large metropolitan Canadian region.","authors":"Teagan L King, Elissa Rennert-May, Ranjani Somayaji, Jenine Leal, Jason E Black, John M Conly, Daniel Gregson","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae157","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the costs of susceptible and resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> bloodstream infections (BSIs) in adults. Secondary outcomes were the impact of BSI on length of stay (LOS), readmissions and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined a population-based retrospective cohort of blood cultures from 2011 to 2018 in Calgary, Canada, linked to microcosting and gross costing data. Propensity score matching was completed, and costs were compared between no BSI and <i>E. coli</i> BSI over 90 days using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4581 BSIs in 89 673 adults experienced <i>E. coli</i> bacteraemia during the study period. The mean cost of an <i>E. coli</i> BSI at 90 days was $39 072 (SD: $95 747) in adults. Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) <i>E. coli</i>, resistant to fluoroquinolones (FQ) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, compared with susceptible <i>E. coli</i> BSI resulted in the greatest mean cost at $53 899 and the highest odds of readmission, increased LOS, and death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>E. coli</i> BSI is associated with substantial costs. Total cost differences were highest in those with CRO-R <i>E. coli</i> with resistance to FQ and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Over the study period, bacteraemia secondary to these strains alone, added over $9 million to costs for healthcare in the Calgary Zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523496/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae165
Christie Cabral, Tingting Zhang, Isabel Oliver, Paul Little, Lucy Yardley, Helen Lambert
Objectives: Self-medication with antibiotics is common practice in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This review synthesizes the qualitative evidence on influences on perceptions and practices in relation to self-medication by the public with antibiotics in LMIC.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted of relevant medical, international and social science databases. Searching, screening, data extraction and quality appraisal followed standard methods. A meta-ethnographic approach was used for synthesis, starting with translation of studies and using a line-of-argument approach to develop the final themes.
Results: The search identified 78 eligible studies. Antibiotics were understood as a powerful, potentially dangerous but effective medicine for treating infections. This perception was strongly influenced by the common experience of being prescribed antibiotics for infections, both individually and collectively. This contributed to an understanding of antibiotics as a rational treatment for infection symptoms that was sanctioned by medical authorities. Accessing antibiotics from medical professionals was often difficult logistically and financially. In contrast, antibiotics were readily available over the counter from local outlets. People viewed treating infection symptoms with antibiotics as rational practice, although they were concerned about the risks to the individual and only took them when they believed they were needed.
Conclusions: A new model to explain self-medication with antibiotics is presented. This uses the socio-ecological model to integrate influences that operate at individual, community and wider socioeconomic levels, drawing on theories of medical authority and the medicalization and commercialization of health. Interventions to reduce overuse of antibiotics in LMIC need to address both clinical practice and community self-medication practices together.
{"title":"Influences on use of antibiotics without prescription by the public in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative evidence.","authors":"Christie Cabral, Tingting Zhang, Isabel Oliver, Paul Little, Lucy Yardley, Helen Lambert","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae165","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Self-medication with antibiotics is common practice in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This review synthesizes the qualitative evidence on influences on perceptions and practices in relation to self-medication by the public with antibiotics in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of relevant medical, international and social science databases. Searching, screening, data extraction and quality appraisal followed standard methods. A meta-ethnographic approach was used for synthesis, starting with translation of studies and using a line-of-argument approach to develop the final themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 78 eligible studies. Antibiotics were understood as a powerful, potentially dangerous but effective medicine for treating infections. This perception was strongly influenced by the common experience of being prescribed antibiotics for infections, both individually and collectively. This contributed to an understanding of antibiotics as a rational treatment for infection symptoms that was sanctioned by medical authorities. Accessing antibiotics from medical professionals was often difficult logistically and financially. In contrast, antibiotics were readily available over the counter from local outlets. People viewed treating infection symptoms with antibiotics as rational practice, although they were concerned about the risks to the individual and only took them when they believed they were needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A new model to explain self-medication with antibiotics is presented. This uses the socio-ecological model to integrate influences that operate at individual, community and wider socioeconomic levels, drawing on theories of medical authority and the medicalization and commercialization of health. Interventions to reduce overuse of antibiotics in LMIC need to address both clinical practice and community self-medication practices together.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503652/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae161
Mark Fahmy, Adam Stewart, Siok-Keen Tey, Krispin Hajkowicz
Objectives: Elizabethkingia species are uncommon causes of bloodstream infections, representing a true opportunistic and multi-drug-resistant pathogen to immunocompromised or vulnerable hosts. Despite this, data are lacking regarding optimal management strategy for infections with this organism, which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. We describe patient characteristics, management and outcomes in this case series.
Patients and methods: All inpatients at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with a positive blood culture for Elizabethkingia spp. were identified by database query. Clinical information including medical history, source of infection, attempts at source control and outcome were collected. Laboratory data including duration of bacteraemia and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were also collected.
Results: All patients had severe defects of innate and adaptive immunity. Targeted therapy was started promptly and efforts at source identification and control were appropriately pursued. Despite this, outcomes were generally poor. A previously unrecognized presentation of relapsing infection was described in one case, requiring long-term suppressive antimicrobials to control. One case died as a result of infection and one case was cured, but died soon after due to complications of immunosuppression.
Conclusions: Treatment of these organisms is challenging due to limited effective therapy, development of on treatment resistance and profound host immunocompromise. Up-front use of multiple, optimally dosed antimicrobials, attempting source control and attempting to restore host immune function all appear to be key to achieving good outcomes.
{"title":"<i>Elizabethkingia</i> bloodstream infections in severely immunocompromised patients: persistent, relapsing and associated with high mortality.","authors":"Mark Fahmy, Adam Stewart, Siok-Keen Tey, Krispin Hajkowicz","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae161","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong><i>Elizabethkingia</i> species are uncommon causes of bloodstream infections, representing a true opportunistic and multi-drug-resistant pathogen to immunocompromised or vulnerable hosts. Despite this, data are lacking regarding optimal management strategy for infections with this organism, which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. We describe patient characteristics, management and outcomes in this case series.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All inpatients at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital with a positive blood culture for <i>Elizabethkingia</i> spp. were identified by database query. Clinical information including medical history, source of infection, attempts at source control and outcome were collected. Laboratory data including duration of bacteraemia and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had severe defects of innate and adaptive immunity. Targeted therapy was started promptly and efforts at source identification and control were appropriately pursued. Despite this, outcomes were generally poor. A previously unrecognized presentation of relapsing infection was described in one case, requiring long-term suppressive antimicrobials to control. One case died as a result of infection and one case was cured, but died soon after due to complications of immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of these organisms is challenging due to limited effective therapy, development of on treatment resistance and profound host immunocompromise. Up-front use of multiple, optimally dosed antimicrobials, attempting source control and attempting to restore host immune function all appear to be key to achieving good outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142545477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals contributes to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluated the prevalence of antibiotic use and adherence to the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics across 16 hospitals in Zambia.
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study employing the WHO Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) methodology and WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics was conducted among inpatients across 16 hospitals in December 2023, Zambia. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17.0.
Results: Of the 1296 inpatients surveyed in the 16 hospitals, 56% were female, and 54% were aged between 16 and 50 years. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use was 70%. Additionally, 52% of the inpatients received Watch group antibiotics, with ceftriaxone being the most prescribed antibiotic. Slightly below half (48%) of the inpatients received Access group antibiotics. Compliance with the local treatment guidelines was 53%.
Conclusions: This study found a high prevalence of prescribing and use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients across the surveyed hospitals in Zambia. The high use of Watch group antibiotics was above the recommended threshold indicating non-adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines for antibiotic use. Hence, there is a need to establish and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programmes that promote the rational use of antibiotics in hospitals in Zambia.
{"title":"Antibiotic use and adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines across 16 hospitals in Zambia: a point prevalence survey.","authors":"Joseph Yamweka Chizimu, Steward Mudenda, Kaunda Yamba, Chileshe Lukwesa, Raphael Chanda, Ruth Nakazwe, Misheck Shawa, Herman Chambaro, Harvey K Kamboyi, Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia, Duncan Chanda, Sombo Fwoloshi, Elimas Jere, Tiza Mufune, Derick Munkombwe, Peter Lisulo, Tebuho Mateele, Jeewan Thapa, Kenneth Kapolowe, Nyambe Sinyange, Cephas Sialubanje, Nathan Kapata, Mirfin Mpundu, Freddie Masaninga, Khalid Azam, Chie Nakajima, Makomani Siyanga, Nathan Nsubuga Bakyaita, Evelyn Wesangula, Martin Matu, Yasuhiko Suzuki, Roma Chilengi","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae170","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals contributes to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluated the prevalence of antibiotic use and adherence to the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch and Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics across 16 hospitals in Zambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional study employing the WHO Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) methodology and WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics was conducted among inpatients across 16 hospitals in December 2023, Zambia. Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1296 inpatients surveyed in the 16 hospitals, 56% were female, and 54% were aged between 16 and 50 years. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use was 70%. Additionally, 52% of the inpatients received Watch group antibiotics, with ceftriaxone being the most prescribed antibiotic. Slightly below half (48%) of the inpatients received Access group antibiotics. Compliance with the local treatment guidelines was 53%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a high prevalence of prescribing and use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients across the surveyed hospitals in Zambia. The high use of Watch group antibiotics was above the recommended threshold indicating non-adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines for antibiotic use. Hence, there is a need to establish and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programmes that promote the rational use of antibiotics in hospitals in Zambia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae172
Ryan A Hamilton, Marco G Ercolani, Rakhi Aggarwal, Donna Cooper, Sam Kelly, Helen Root, Kunjal Pabari, Conor Jamieson
Background: Community pharmacies in England offer convenient and safe disposal of unwanted medicines, including antimicrobials, and better uptake of this service could limit environmental antimicrobial resistance. However, there is limited information on the extent and nature of antibiotic returns to community pharmacies. The impact of an antibiotic amnesty campaign promoting antibiotic disposal through community pharmacies was evaluated with the intention of collecting detailed information on the antibiotics returned.
Methods: An antibiotic amnesty campaign was delivered by community pharmacies in the Midlands (England) with an audit of returned antibiotics conducted in 19 community pharmacies in Leicestershire. Detailed information on antibiotics returned for disposal was gathered during the month-long amnesty campaign and again 3 months later in the same pharmacies.
Results: Antibiotics accounted for 3.12%-3.35% of all returned medicines. The amnesty campaign led to a significant increase in defined daily doses of returned antibiotics compared to the post-amnesty period (P = 0.0165), but there was no difference in the overall number of returned medicines. Penicillins were the most commonly returned antibiotics in both periods (29.3% and 42.5% of packs, respectively), while solid oral dose formulations predominated. A total of 36.6% of antibiotics returned during the amnesty period were expired, increasing to 53.4% in the post-amnesty period. Amnesty conversations had a significant impact on the number of antibiotic returns but campaign posters did not.
Conclusions: Antibiotic conversations can increase the amount of antibiotics returned to community pharmacies for safe disposal, and passive campaign materials had limited impact. More research is needed to identify the most effective interventions to increase returns.
{"title":"Evaluation of antibiotics returned for safe disposal during and after a community pharmacy antibiotic amnesty campaign.","authors":"Ryan A Hamilton, Marco G Ercolani, Rakhi Aggarwal, Donna Cooper, Sam Kelly, Helen Root, Kunjal Pabari, Conor Jamieson","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae172","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community pharmacies in England offer convenient and safe disposal of unwanted medicines, including antimicrobials, and better uptake of this service could limit environmental antimicrobial resistance. However, there is limited information on the extent and nature of antibiotic returns to community pharmacies. The impact of an antibiotic amnesty campaign promoting antibiotic disposal through community pharmacies was evaluated with the intention of collecting detailed information on the antibiotics returned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An antibiotic amnesty campaign was delivered by community pharmacies in the Midlands (England) with an audit of returned antibiotics conducted in 19 community pharmacies in Leicestershire. Detailed information on antibiotics returned for disposal was gathered during the month-long amnesty campaign and again 3 months later in the same pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antibiotics accounted for 3.12%-3.35% of all returned medicines. The amnesty campaign led to a significant increase in defined daily doses of returned antibiotics compared to the post-amnesty period (<i>P </i>= 0.0165), but there was no difference in the overall number of returned medicines. Penicillins were the most commonly returned antibiotics in both periods (29.3% and 42.5% of packs, respectively), while solid oral dose formulations predominated. A total of 36.6% of antibiotics returned during the amnesty period were expired, increasing to 53.4% in the post-amnesty period. Amnesty conversations had a significant impact on the number of antibiotic returns but campaign posters did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotic conversations can increase the amount of antibiotics returned to community pharmacies for safe disposal, and passive campaign materials had limited impact. More research is needed to identify the most effective interventions to increase returns.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503646/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae168
Simon Briggs, Eamon Duffy, Hasan Bhally, Matthew Broom, Patrick Campbell, Rebekah Lane, Stephen McBride, Genevieve Walls, Simon Dalton
Background: Many patients with Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis are clinically stable and able to leave hospital before completing antibiotic treatment, but data are lacking regarding some outpatient treatment options.
Objectives: To assess the outcomes for adults with E. faecalis endocarditis receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus bolus/continuous infusion IV ceftriaxone.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults who received at least 2 weeks duration of OPAT for E. faecalis endocarditis with the above treatment regimen in the Auckland and Christchurch regions between July 2019 and September 2022.
Results: Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Fifteen were female (34%). The median age was 80 (IQR 71.5 to 84) years. Twenty-two (50%) had prosthetic valve (PV), 15 (34%) native valve (NV), 3 (7%) NV and/or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, 3 (7%) PV and/or CIED infection, and 1 (2%) repaired valve endocarditis. Patients received a median of 16.5 days inpatient and 28 days OPAT antibiotic treatment. The 12 month outcome was cure (n = 25; 57%), antibiotic suppression (n = 9; 20%), relapse (n = 2; 5%; both possible) or death (n = 8; 18%). Compared with a historical cohort treated with OPAT continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus bolus IV gentamicin, there was no difference in the relapse rate.
Conclusions: This study adds to the accumulating evidence supporting the treatment of E. faecalis endocarditis with OPAT continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus bolus/continuous infusion IV ceftriaxone. This is an option for patients requiring further antibiotic treatment at the time of hospital discharge.
背景:许多粪肠球菌心内膜炎患者临床症状稳定,可以在完成抗生素治疗前离开医院,但缺乏有关一些门诊治疗方案的数据:目的:评估成人粪肠球菌性心内膜炎患者接受门诊肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT),即持续输注静脉滴注苄青霉素加栓剂/持续输注静脉滴注头孢曲松的疗效:我们回顾性研究了2019年7月至2022年9月期间奥克兰和基督城地区因粪肠球菌心内膜炎接受上述治疗方案的OPAT治疗至少2周的成人患者:44名患者符合纳入标准。其中15人为女性(34%)。中位年龄为80岁(IQR为71.5至84岁)。22人(50%)患有人工瓣膜(PV),15人(34%)患有原发瓣膜(NV),3人(7%)患有NV和/或心脏植入电子装置(CIED)感染,3人(7%)患有PV和/或CIED感染,1人(2%)患有修复过的瓣膜心内膜炎。患者接受了中位数为 16.5 天的住院治疗和 28 天的 OPAT 抗生素治疗。12 个月的治疗结果为治愈(25 人;57%)、抗生素抑制(9 人;20%)、复发(2 人;5%;均有可能)或死亡(8 人;18%)。与使用 OPAT 持续输注静脉注射苄青霉素加静脉注射庆大霉素治疗的历史队列相比,复发率没有差异:这项研究补充了支持用OPAT持续输注静脉滴注苄青霉素加静注/持续输注静脉滴注头孢曲松治疗粪肠球菌性心内膜炎的证据。对于出院时需要进一步接受抗生素治疗的患者来说,这不失为一种选择。
{"title":"Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for patients with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> endocarditis using continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus IV ceftriaxone.","authors":"Simon Briggs, Eamon Duffy, Hasan Bhally, Matthew Broom, Patrick Campbell, Rebekah Lane, Stephen McBride, Genevieve Walls, Simon Dalton","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae168","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> endocarditis are clinically stable and able to leave hospital before completing antibiotic treatment, but data are lacking regarding some outpatient treatment options.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the outcomes for adults with <i>E. faecalis</i> endocarditis receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus bolus/continuous infusion IV ceftriaxone.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed adults who received at least 2 weeks duration of OPAT for <i>E. faecalis</i> endocarditis with the above treatment regimen in the Auckland and Christchurch regions between July 2019 and September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Fifteen were female (34%). The median age was 80 (IQR 71.5 to 84) years. Twenty-two (50%) had prosthetic valve (PV), 15 (34%) native valve (NV), 3 (7%) NV and/or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, 3 (7%) PV and/or CIED infection, and 1 (2%) repaired valve endocarditis. Patients received a median of 16.5 days inpatient and 28 days OPAT antibiotic treatment. The 12 month outcome was cure (<i>n</i> = 25; 57%), antibiotic suppression (<i>n</i> = 9; 20%), relapse (<i>n</i> = 2; 5%; both possible) or death (<i>n</i> = 8; 18%). Compared with a historical cohort treated with OPAT continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus bolus IV gentamicin, there was no difference in the relapse rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the accumulating evidence supporting the treatment of <i>E. faecalis</i> endocarditis with OPAT continuous infusion IV benzylpenicillin plus bolus/continuous infusion IV ceftriaxone. This is an option for patients requiring further antibiotic treatment at the time of hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24eCollection Date: 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae169
Alvaro Irigoyen-von-Sierakowski, Azahara Ocaña, Rosa Sánchez-Mayoral, Emilia Cercenado
Objectives: Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP®) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study.
Methods: The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 84 Acinetobacter spp. and 224 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP® Cefiderocol, Liofilchem).
Results: A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP® BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP® BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP® BMD (Acinetobacter baumannii isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%).
Conclusions: DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP® BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.
{"title":"Real-world performance of susceptibility testing for cefiderocol: insights from a prospective multicentre study on Gram-negative bacteria.","authors":"Alvaro Irigoyen-von-Sierakowski, Azahara Ocaña, Rosa Sánchez-Mayoral, Emilia Cercenado","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae169","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae169","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP<sup>®</sup>) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, 84 <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. and 224 <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP<sup>®</sup> Cefiderocol, Liofilchem).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD (<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP<sup>®</sup> BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 5","pages":"dlae169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142500599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}