Environmental measures to improve pedestrian safety in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/17579759241241513
Saidou Sabi Boun, Ronaldo Janvier, Rose Eveyoung Jean Marc, Peterline Paul, Rachel Senat, Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes, Guillaume Burigusa, Sarah Chaput, Pierre Maurice, Thomas Druetz
{"title":"Environmental measures to improve pedestrian safety in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.","authors":"Saidou Sabi Boun, Ronaldo Janvier, Rose Eveyoung Jean Marc, Peterline Paul, Rachel Senat, Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes, Guillaume Burigusa, Sarah Chaput, Pierre Maurice, Thomas Druetz","doi":"10.1177/17579759241241513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping study aims to identify environmental road safety measures implemented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to reduce pedestrian injuries from collisions with motor vehicles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed Arksey and O'Malley's approach and reported results using the PRISMA-SCR 2018 checklist. A literature review was conducted in Medline, Google Scholar, and the Transport Research International Documentation database using keyword-derived medical subject heading terms. A total of 14 articles met the pre-established inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a data extraction matrix. The findings were categorized methodically into three prominent themes: (1) methods for reducing pedestrian exposure, (2) traffic calming strategies, and (3) measures for enhancing pedestrian visibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traffic calming strategies, including vehicular speed reduction, roadway contraction, and vertical and horizontal diversionary tactics, emerged as the most effective interventions for reducing pedestrian injuries within LMICs. Conversely, interventions geared towards minimizing pedestrian exposure, such as zebra crossings, crosswalks controlled by traffic signals, underpasses, or overpasses, often produced minimal effects, and occasionally exacerbated the risk of pedestrian accidents. Lack of pedestrian visibility due to density of street vendors and parked vehicles was associated with a higher risk of injuries, while billboards impaired drivers' attention and increased the likelihood of collisions with pedestrians.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In LMICs, the effectiveness of environmental measures in reducing vehicle-pedestrian crashes varies widely. In the face of resource constraints, implementing interventions for pedestrian safety in LMICs necessitates careful prioritization and consideration of the local context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46805,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"17579759241241513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759241241513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This scoping study aims to identify environmental road safety measures implemented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to reduce pedestrian injuries from collisions with motor vehicles.

Methods: This review followed Arksey and O'Malley's approach and reported results using the PRISMA-SCR 2018 checklist. A literature review was conducted in Medline, Google Scholar, and the Transport Research International Documentation database using keyword-derived medical subject heading terms. A total of 14 articles met the pre-established inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a data extraction matrix. The findings were categorized methodically into three prominent themes: (1) methods for reducing pedestrian exposure, (2) traffic calming strategies, and (3) measures for enhancing pedestrian visibility.

Results: Traffic calming strategies, including vehicular speed reduction, roadway contraction, and vertical and horizontal diversionary tactics, emerged as the most effective interventions for reducing pedestrian injuries within LMICs. Conversely, interventions geared towards minimizing pedestrian exposure, such as zebra crossings, crosswalks controlled by traffic signals, underpasses, or overpasses, often produced minimal effects, and occasionally exacerbated the risk of pedestrian accidents. Lack of pedestrian visibility due to density of street vendors and parked vehicles was associated with a higher risk of injuries, while billboards impaired drivers' attention and increased the likelihood of collisions with pedestrians.

Discussion: In LMICs, the effectiveness of environmental measures in reducing vehicle-pedestrian crashes varies widely. In the face of resource constraints, implementing interventions for pedestrian safety in LMICs necessitates careful prioritization and consideration of the local context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善中低收入国家行人安全的环境措施:范围审查。
目标:本范围研究旨在确定低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)实施的环境道路安全措施,以减少机动车碰撞造成的行人伤害:本范围研究旨在确定低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)为减少机动车碰撞造成的行人伤害而实施的环境道路安全措施:本综述采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法,并使用 PRISMA-SCR 2018 核对表报告结果。我们在 Medline、Google Scholar 和运输研究国际文献数据库中使用关键词衍生的医学主题词进行了文献综述。共有 14 篇文章符合预先确定的纳入标准,并使用数据提取矩阵进行了分析。研究结果被有条理地归类为三个突出主题:(1)减少行人暴露的方法;(2)交通疏导策略;(3)提高行人能见度的措施:结果:交通疏导策略,包括降低车速、收缩道路以及纵向和横向分流策略,成为低收入和中等收入国家减少行人伤害最有效的干预措施。相反,旨在尽量减少行人暴露的干预措施,如斑马线、由交通信号灯控制的人行横道、地下通道或立交桥,往往收效甚微,有时还会加剧行人事故的风险。由于街头摊贩和停放车辆的密度而导致的行人能见度不足与较高的受伤风险有关,而广告牌则会影响司机的注意力,增加与行人发生碰撞的可能性:在低收入和中等收入国家,环境措施在减少车辆与行人碰撞事故方面的效果差别很大。在资源有限的情况下,要在低收入和中等收入国家实施行人安全干预措施,就必须认真确定优先次序并考虑当地的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Promotion
Global Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal aims to: ·publish academic content and commentaries of practical importance; ·provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination and exchange of health promotion, health education and public health theory, research findings, practice and reviews; ·publish articles which ensure wide geographical coverage and are of general interest to an international readership; ·provide fair, supportive, efficient and high quality peer review and editorial handling of all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Effect of an educational intervention based on the Health Belief Model on prevention and fear of falling among older people. Validación de un instrumento para identificar las conductas promotoras de salud en estudiantes universitarios. Vers une approche systémique de la santé à l'école : travailler les conditions et leviers de déploiement. Galvanising social innovation in gambling harms reduction: a process evaluation of a multi-component Community of Practice. A theoretical analysis of professionalism in health promotion with a focus on the Swiss context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1