International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI).

Health systems and reform Pub Date : 2023-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2024.2330112
Peter Baker, Edwine Barasa, Kalipso Chalkidou, Lumbwe Chola, Anthony Culyer, Saudamini Dabak, Victoria Y Fan, Katrine Frønsdal, Lieke Fleur Heupink, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Rahab Mbau, Abha Mehndiratta, Justice Nonvignon, Francis Ruiz, Yot Teerawattananon, Anna Vassall, Javier Guzman
{"title":"International Partnerships to Develop Evidence-informed Priority Setting Institutions: Ten Years of Experience from the International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI).","authors":"Peter Baker, Edwine Barasa, Kalipso Chalkidou, Lumbwe Chola, Anthony Culyer, Saudamini Dabak, Victoria Y Fan, Katrine Frønsdal, Lieke Fleur Heupink, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Rahab Mbau, Abha Mehndiratta, Justice Nonvignon, Francis Ruiz, Yot Teerawattananon, Anna Vassall, Javier Guzman","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2024.2330112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All health systems must set priorities. Evidence-informed priority-setting (EIPS) is a specific form of systematic priority-setting which involves explicit consideration of evidence to determine the healthcare interventions to be provided. The international Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) was established in 2013 as a collaborative platform to catalyze faster progress on EIPS, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This article summarizes the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from ten years of iDSI partnering with countries to develop EIPS institutions and processes. This is a thematic documentary analysis, structured by iDSI's theory of change, extracting successes, challenges, and lessons from three external evaluations and 19 internal reports to funders. We identified three phases of iDSI's work-inception (2013-15), scale-up (2016-2019), and focus on Africa (2019-2023). iDSI has established a global platform for coordinating EIPS, advanced the field, and supported regional networks in Asia and Africa. It has facilitated progress in securing high-level commitment to EIPS, strengthened EIPS institutions, and developed capacity for health technology assessments. This has resulted in improved decisions on service provision, procurement, and clinical care. Major lessons learned include the importance of sustained political will to develop EIPS; a clear EIPS mandate; inclusive governance structures appropriate to health financing context; politically sensitive and country-led support to EIPS, taking advantage of policy windows for EIPS reforms; regional networks for peer support and long-term sustainability; utilization of context appropriate methods such as adaptive HTA; and crucially, donor-funded global health initiatives supporting and integrating with national EIPS systems, not undermining them.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"9 3","pages":"2330112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2330112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All health systems must set priorities. Evidence-informed priority-setting (EIPS) is a specific form of systematic priority-setting which involves explicit consideration of evidence to determine the healthcare interventions to be provided. The international Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) was established in 2013 as a collaborative platform to catalyze faster progress on EIPS, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This article summarizes the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from ten years of iDSI partnering with countries to develop EIPS institutions and processes. This is a thematic documentary analysis, structured by iDSI's theory of change, extracting successes, challenges, and lessons from three external evaluations and 19 internal reports to funders. We identified three phases of iDSI's work-inception (2013-15), scale-up (2016-2019), and focus on Africa (2019-2023). iDSI has established a global platform for coordinating EIPS, advanced the field, and supported regional networks in Asia and Africa. It has facilitated progress in securing high-level commitment to EIPS, strengthened EIPS institutions, and developed capacity for health technology assessments. This has resulted in improved decisions on service provision, procurement, and clinical care. Major lessons learned include the importance of sustained political will to develop EIPS; a clear EIPS mandate; inclusive governance structures appropriate to health financing context; politically sensitive and country-led support to EIPS, taking advantage of policy windows for EIPS reforms; regional networks for peer support and long-term sustainability; utilization of context appropriate methods such as adaptive HTA; and crucially, donor-funded global health initiatives supporting and integrating with national EIPS systems, not undermining them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展有实证依据的优先事项制定机构的国际伙伴关系:国际决策支持计划(iDSI)十年经验。
所有医疗系统都必须确定优先事项。有证据支持的优先事项设定(EIPS)是系统性优先事项设定的一种具体形式,它涉及明确考虑证据,以确定应提供的医疗保健干预措施。国际决策支持倡议(iDSI)成立于 2013 年,作为一个合作平台,旨在促进 EIPS 更快取得进展,尤其是在中低收入国家。本文总结了 iDSI 十年来与各国合作开发 EIPS 机构和流程的成功经验、挑战和教训。这是一篇专题文献分析,以 iDSI 的变革理论为架构,从三份外部评估报告和 19 份给资助者的内部报告中提取成功、挑战和经验教训。我们确定了 iDSI 工作的三个阶段--入选阶段(2013-15 年)、扩大阶段(2016-2019 年)和聚焦非洲阶段(2019-2023 年)。iDSI 建立了一个协调 EIPS 的全球平台,推动了该领域的发展,并为亚洲和非洲的地区网络提供了支持。它促进了在确保高层对 EIPS 的承诺、加强 EIPS 机构和发展卫生技术评估能力方面取得进展。这改进了服务提供、采购和临床护理方面的决策。汲取的主要经验教训包括发展 EIPS 的持续政治意愿的重要性;明确的 EIPS 任务;适合卫生筹资情况的包容性治理结构;对 EIPS 具有政治敏感性并由国家主导的支持,利用 EIPS 改革的政策窗口;促进同行支持和长期可持续性的区域网络;利用适应性 HTA 等适合具体情况的方法;以及至关重要的是,由捐助者资助的全球卫生倡议应支持国家 EIPS 系统并与之整合,而不是破坏它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Public Financial Management Save Life? Evidence from a Quantitative Review of PFM and Health Outcomes in Sub-Saharan African Countries. COVID-19 Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in the US: An Urgent Call for Equitable and Integrated Health Systems and an All-Hazards Approach to the Next Crisis. Resilience of Primary Health Care in Ukraine: Challenges of the Pandemic and War. The Impact of Centralized Procurement on Treatment Patterns for Myocardial Infarction and More Principled Utilization of Coronary Stents. Data Integration of Health Financing Systems as a Critical Enabler for Objective-Oriented Health System Reform: A Scoping Review from India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1