Comparative Clinical Study of Two Tooth Whitening Protocols. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part 2.

María Cantero-Gómez, Jorge Vicente-Sanchez, María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud, Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón, Carlos Oteo-Morilla
{"title":"Comparative Clinical Study of Two Tooth Whitening Protocols. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part 2.","authors":"María Cantero-Gómez, Jorge Vicente-Sanchez, María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud, Wenceslao Piedra-Cascón, Carlos Oteo-Morilla","doi":"10.11607/prd.7106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of two different home whitening protocols and to determine which is more effective: applying the whitening gel every 48 hours or every 72 hours for 6 weeks. The differences in terms of tooth sensitivity are also analyzed. A sample of 72 patients was randomly divided into 3 groups of 24 (N&#61;24). Group A: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 48h for 6 weeks. Group B: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 72h for 6 weeks. Group C (control group): a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 48h for 6 weeks. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer and ANOVA test and Bonferroni test was used. The confidence level was set at 95% (p ≤ 0.05) and no statistically significant differences between applying 16% carbamide peroxide every 48h or every 72h for 6 weeks (p> 0.05) were found. The study concluded that carbamide peroxide 16% is equally effective applied with both protocols, obtaining the same results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of two different home whitening protocols and to determine which is more effective: applying the whitening gel every 48 hours or every 72 hours for 6 weeks. The differences in terms of tooth sensitivity are also analyzed. A sample of 72 patients was randomly divided into 3 groups of 24 (N=24). Group A: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 48h for 6 weeks. Group B: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 72h for 6 weeks. Group C (control group): a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 48h for 6 weeks. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer and ANOVA test and Bonferroni test was used. The confidence level was set at 95% (p ≤ 0.05) and no statistically significant differences between applying 16% carbamide peroxide every 48h or every 72h for 6 weeks (p> 0.05) were found. The study concluded that carbamide peroxide 16% is equally effective applied with both protocols, obtaining the same results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种牙齿美白方案的比较临床研究。随机临床试验。第 2 部分.
这项研究旨在对两种不同的家庭美白方案的功效进行临床评估,并确定每 48 小时使用一次美白凝胶或每 72 小时使用一次美白凝胶,持续 6 周,哪种方案更有效。同时还分析了牙齿敏感度方面的差异。72 名患者被随机分为 3 组,每组 24 人(N=24)。A 组:每 48 小时使用一次 16% 过氧化卡巴酰胺,持续 6 周。B 组:每 72 小时使用一次 16% 的过氧化氢,持续 6 周。C 组(对照组):每 48 小时涂抹一次不含过氧化物的安慰剂凝胶(甘油凝胶),持续 6 周。为了对各组进行比较,使用分光光度计对颜色进行测量,并进行方差分析和邦费罗尼检验。置信度设定为 95%(P ≤ 0.05),发现每 48 小时或每 72 小时涂抹 16% 过氧化卡巴酰胺 6 周之间没有显著的统计学差异(P> 0.05)。研究得出结论,16% 的过氧化卡巴酰胺在两种方案中的使用效果相同,获得的结果也相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cement- Versus Screw-Retained Implant Positioning in the Esthetic Zone on Emergence Angle: A Proof-of-Principle Study. The Management of Gingival Fenestration: A Series of Three Cases. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Patient Communication: Current Possibilities. Autonomous Dental Implant Robotic System Utilization for Implant Placement and Transcrestal Sinus Elevation Using Osseodensification: A Case Report. Alveolar Ridge Preservation Procedures Performed with Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: Clinical and Histologic Outcomes in a Case Series: Part II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1