Enhanced assessment framework of static stability of tracked vehicles in consideration of multi-directional loading

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Terramechanics Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jterra.2024.100984
Ning Zhao , Youkou Dong , Dingtao Yan , Xiaowei Feng , Lan Cui
{"title":"Enhanced assessment framework of static stability of tracked vehicles in consideration of multi-directional loading","authors":"Ning Zhao ,&nbsp;Youkou Dong ,&nbsp;Dingtao Yan ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Feng ,&nbsp;Lan Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.jterra.2024.100984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tracked vehicles are widely used in transportation, excavation, and site investigation due to their advantages of maneuverability and off-road ability. Static stability of tracked vehicles has been characterized with the static stability factor (SSF) and the static roll threshold (<em>SRT</em>) by assuming the ground as perfectly rigid. Considering the interaction between the vehicle and the ground, the traditional studies assess the static stability of vehicles under uni-directional loads by ignoring coupling effect between the load components. This paper enhances the traditional framework by evaluating the static stability of tracked vehicles under multi-directional loads. The two tracks of a tracked vehicle are considered as two parallel shallow foundations. The failure envelope method is adopted to capture the maximum allowable loads through swipe test and fixed ratio test. A new coefficient, factor of stability (<em>FOS</em>), is introduced to quantify the static stability of the tracked vehicles. Various track configurations and load combinations have been considered. The judgment process of tracked vehicle’s stability and the calculation method of <em>FOS</em> are detailed. The results show that the <em>FOS</em> obtained from the enhanced framework is more conservative than that from the traditional one.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Terramechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Terramechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022489824000260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tracked vehicles are widely used in transportation, excavation, and site investigation due to their advantages of maneuverability and off-road ability. Static stability of tracked vehicles has been characterized with the static stability factor (SSF) and the static roll threshold (SRT) by assuming the ground as perfectly rigid. Considering the interaction between the vehicle and the ground, the traditional studies assess the static stability of vehicles under uni-directional loads by ignoring coupling effect between the load components. This paper enhances the traditional framework by evaluating the static stability of tracked vehicles under multi-directional loads. The two tracks of a tracked vehicle are considered as two parallel shallow foundations. The failure envelope method is adopted to capture the maximum allowable loads through swipe test and fixed ratio test. A new coefficient, factor of stability (FOS), is introduced to quantify the static stability of the tracked vehicles. Various track configurations and load combinations have been considered. The judgment process of tracked vehicle’s stability and the calculation method of FOS are detailed. The results show that the FOS obtained from the enhanced framework is more conservative than that from the traditional one.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑多向载荷的履带式车辆静态稳定性强化评估框架
履带式车辆因其机动性和越野能力强等优点,被广泛应用于运输、挖掘和现场勘查等领域。履带式车辆的静态稳定性是通过静态稳定系数(SSF)和静态滚动阈值(SRT)来描述的,假设地面是完全刚性的。考虑到车辆与地面之间的相互作用,传统研究评估车辆在单向负载下的静态稳定性时忽略了负载分量之间的耦合效应。本文通过评估履带式车辆在多方向载荷作用下的静态稳定性,对传统框架进行了改进。履带式车辆的两条履带被视为两个平行的浅基础。采用破坏包络法,通过掠过试验和固定比率试验来捕捉最大允许载荷。引入了一个新系数--稳定系数(FOS),用于量化履带式车辆的静态稳定性。考虑了各种轨道配置和负载组合。详细介绍了履带车辆稳定性的判断过程和 FOS 的计算方法。结果表明,与传统框架相比,增强框架得到的 FOS 更为保守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Terramechanics
Journal of Terramechanics 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
15.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Terramechanics is primarily devoted to scientific articles concerned with research, design, and equipment utilization in the field of terramechanics. The Journal of Terramechanics is the leading international journal serving the multidisciplinary global off-road vehicle and soil working machinery industries, and related user community, governmental agencies and universities. The Journal of Terramechanics provides a forum for those involved in research, development, design, innovation, testing, application and utilization of off-road vehicles and soil working machinery, and their sub-systems and components. The Journal presents a cross-section of technical papers, reviews, comments and discussions, and serves as a medium for recording recent progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
Modelling and simulation fundamentals in design for ground vehicle mobility Part II: Western approach Numerical analysis of tire mobility on deformable plastic clay in saturated conditions using total and effective stress frameworks Analysis of tire characteristics driving on asphalt paved roads covered with volcanic ash Modelling and simulation fundamentals in design for ground vehicle mobility part I: Eastern approach Towards more efficient tractors: Assessing and refining traction test procedures for agricultural tractors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1