Primer set evaluation and sampling method assessment for the monitoring of fish communities in the North-western part of the Mediterranean Sea through eDNA metabarcoding

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1002/edn3.554
Sylvain Roblet, Fabrice Priouzeau, Gilles Gambini, Benoit Dérijard, Cécile Sabourault
{"title":"Primer set evaluation and sampling method assessment for the monitoring of fish communities in the North-western part of the Mediterranean Sea through eDNA metabarcoding","authors":"Sylvain Roblet,&nbsp;Fabrice Priouzeau,&nbsp;Gilles Gambini,&nbsp;Benoit Dérijard,&nbsp;Cécile Sabourault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding appears to be a promising tool to survey fish communities. However, the effectiveness of this method relies on primer set performance and on a robust sampling strategy. While some studies have evaluated the efficiency of several primers for fish detection, it has not yet been assessed <i>in situ</i> for the Mediterranean Sea. In addition, mainly surface waters were sampled and no filter porosity testing was performed. In this pilot study, our aim was to evaluate the ability of six primer sets, targeting 12S rRNA (AcMDB07; MiFish; Tele04) or 16S rRNA (Fish16S; Fish16SFD; Vert16S) loci, to detect fish species in the Mediterranean Sea using a metabarcoding approach. We also assessed the influence of sampling depth and filter pore size (0.45 μm versus 5 μm filters). To achieve this, we developed a novel sampling strategy allowing simultaneous surface and bottom on-site filtration of large water volumes along the same transect. We found that 16S rRNA primer sets enabled more fish taxa to be detected across each taxonomic level. The best combination was Fish16S/Vert16S/AcMDB07, which recovered 95% of the 97 fish species detected in our study. There were highly significant differences in species composition between surface and bottom samples. Filters of 0.45 μm led to the detection of significantly more fish species. Therefore, to maximize fish detection in the studied area, we recommend to filter both surface and bottom waters through 0.45 μm filters and to use a combination of these three primer sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.554","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding appears to be a promising tool to survey fish communities. However, the effectiveness of this method relies on primer set performance and on a robust sampling strategy. While some studies have evaluated the efficiency of several primers for fish detection, it has not yet been assessed in situ for the Mediterranean Sea. In addition, mainly surface waters were sampled and no filter porosity testing was performed. In this pilot study, our aim was to evaluate the ability of six primer sets, targeting 12S rRNA (AcMDB07; MiFish; Tele04) or 16S rRNA (Fish16S; Fish16SFD; Vert16S) loci, to detect fish species in the Mediterranean Sea using a metabarcoding approach. We also assessed the influence of sampling depth and filter pore size (0.45 μm versus 5 μm filters). To achieve this, we developed a novel sampling strategy allowing simultaneous surface and bottom on-site filtration of large water volumes along the same transect. We found that 16S rRNA primer sets enabled more fish taxa to be detected across each taxonomic level. The best combination was Fish16S/Vert16S/AcMDB07, which recovered 95% of the 97 fish species detected in our study. There were highly significant differences in species composition between surface and bottom samples. Filters of 0.45 μm led to the detection of significantly more fish species. Therefore, to maximize fish detection in the studied area, we recommend to filter both surface and bottom waters through 0.45 μm filters and to use a combination of these three primer sets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 eDNA 代谢编码监测地中海西北部鱼类群落的引物集评估和取样方法评估
环境 DNA(eDNA)代谢编码似乎是一种很有前景的鱼类群落调查工具。然而,这种方法的有效性取决于引物组的性能和强大的取样策略。虽然一些研究已经评估了几种引物对鱼类检测的效率,但尚未对地中海进行实地评估。此外,我们主要对地表水进行了采样,没有进行过滤器孔隙度测试。在这项试验性研究中,我们的目的是评估针对 12S rRNA(AcMDB07;MiFish;Tele04)或 16S rRNA(Fish16S;Fish16SFD;Vert16S)位点的六组引物使用代谢编码方法检测地中海鱼类物种的能力。我们还评估了取样深度和过滤器孔径(0.45 μm 与 5 μm 过滤器)的影响。为此,我们开发了一种新颖的取样策略,可在同一横断面上同时对大量水体进行表层和底层现场过滤。我们发现,16S rRNA 引物组能够在各个分类级别检测到更多的鱼类分类群。最佳组合是 Fish16S/Vert16S/AcMDB07,在我们的研究中检测到的 97 个鱼类物种中,有 95% 都是通过该组合恢复的。表层和底层样本的物种组成差异非常明显。0.45 μm 过滤器可检测到更多的鱼类物种。因此,为了在研究区域最大限度地检测到鱼类,我们建议通过 0.45 μm 过滤器对表层和底层水进行过滤,并结合使用这三种引物组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bottom Trawling and Multi-Marker eDNA Metabarcoding Surveys Reveal Highly Diverse Vertebrate and Crustacean Communities: A Case Study in an Urbanized Subtropical Estuary Evaluation of a Nanopore Sequencing Strategy on Bacterial Communities From Marine Sediments Current Trends in Biophysical Modeling of eDNA Dynamics for the Detection of Marine Species Validation of Environmental DNA for Estimating Proportional and Absolute Biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1