The Dangers of Demagogues and Democratic Revolution: on Aristotle’s Education of the Serious

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS POLIS Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340438
Kenneth Andrew Andres Leonardo
{"title":"The Dangers of Demagogues and Democratic Revolution: on Aristotle’s Education of the Serious","authors":"Kenneth Andrew Andres Leonardo","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article concerns the dangers of demagogues in democracies described in the <em>Politics</em> and the edifying purposes of Aristotle’s ethical works in relation to the politically ambitious student. The translation of <styled-content lang=\"el-Grek\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">σπουδαῖος</styled-content> as serious is key to understanding the connection between these works. Although similar arguments appear elsewhere in his <em>Corpus</em>, Aristotle’s arguments in the <em>Great Ethics</em> are unique because the audience is warned about the dangers of political rule and is ultimately led away from the pursuit of it. Aristotle appears to specifically lead this class of politically ambitious students toward a serious pursuit of virtue, justice, and prudence with a final view to both friendship and citizenship. This emphasis is significant because an ‘individual who is serious-about-rule’ (<styled-content lang=\"el-Grek\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">σπουδάρχης</styled-content>) is excessively eager for office. Furthermore, ‘those serious-about-rule’ are dangerous when they act as demagogues, and this is one cause of revolutions in democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article concerns the dangers of demagogues in democracies described in the Politics and the edifying purposes of Aristotle’s ethical works in relation to the politically ambitious student. The translation of σπουδαῖος as serious is key to understanding the connection between these works. Although similar arguments appear elsewhere in his Corpus, Aristotle’s arguments in the Great Ethics are unique because the audience is warned about the dangers of political rule and is ultimately led away from the pursuit of it. Aristotle appears to specifically lead this class of politically ambitious students toward a serious pursuit of virtue, justice, and prudence with a final view to both friendship and citizenship. This emphasis is significant because an ‘individual who is serious-about-rule’ (σπουδάρχης) is excessively eager for office. Furthermore, ‘those serious-about-rule’ are dangerous when they act as demagogues, and this is one cause of revolutions in democracies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煽动者的危险与民主革命:论亚里士多德的严肃教育
本文论述了《政治学》中描述的民主政体中蛊惑人心者的危险,以及亚里士多德的伦理作品对有政治抱负的学生的教化作用。将σπουδαῖος译为严肃是理解这些作品之间联系的关键。虽然亚里士多德在《大全》的其他部分也提出了类似的论点,但他在《大伦理学》中提出的论点是独一无二的,因为亚里士多德告诫读者政治统治的危险性,并最终引导他们放弃对政治统治的追求。亚里士多德似乎在特别引导这群有政治抱负的学生认真追求美德、正义和审慎,最终着眼于友谊和公民身份。这种强调意义重大,因为 "认真对待规则的人"(σπουδάρχης)会过分渴望担任公职。此外,"认真对待统治的人 "如果充当蛊惑人心的蛊惑者,就会很危险,而这正是民主国家发生革命的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Partnership in Book II of the Republic Socratic Contempt for Wealth in Plato’s Republic Praxis as Property: the Concept of Justice in Plato’s Republic Political Performativity in Performance Culture: Xenophon’s Hipparchikos and the Dithyrambic Chorus The King’s House or the Tyrant’s Palace? Rethinking Persia in Herodotus’s History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1