A Stochastic Techno-Economic Analysis of Forest Biomass Feedstock Supply Chains: Clean and Dirty Chips for Bioenergy Applications

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS BioEnergy Research Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1
HakSoo Ha, Tristan R. Brown, Ryan J. Quinn, Timothy A. Volk, Robert W. Malmsheimer, Marie-Odile P. Fortier, Steven Bick, Jenny R. Frank
{"title":"A Stochastic Techno-Economic Analysis of Forest Biomass Feedstock Supply Chains: Clean and Dirty Chips for Bioenergy Applications","authors":"HakSoo Ha,&nbsp;Tristan R. Brown,&nbsp;Ryan J. Quinn,&nbsp;Timothy A. Volk,&nbsp;Robert W. Malmsheimer,&nbsp;Marie-Odile P. Fortier,&nbsp;Steven Bick,&nbsp;Jenny R. Frank","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study reports results from a stochastic techno-economic analysis (TEA) model that assessed the financial feasibility of forest biomass harvest for low-carbon bioenergy feedstocks in the hardwood region of the Northeast United States. It analyzed three 24-year scenarios based on primary data collected from the mixed product harvest with whole tree harvesting systems that primarily produce clean chips, dirty chips, or pulpwood and dirty chips. Using a joint product costing approach, proportional costs of shared processes were allocated to different products on a mass basis. Uncertainty associated with key stochastic variables was incorporated into the model to generate net present values (NPV), benefit–cost ratios (BCR), and minimum selling prices (MSP) via Monte Carlo simulation. The clean chip scenario produced an NPV of $1.36 million and a BCR of 1.03, while the pulpwood scenario’s NPV and BCR ($0.06 million and 1.02) were lower, and the dirty chip scenario generated negative NPV (− $0.02 million) and a BCR of 0.99. The probabilities of achieving positive NPVs for all three scenarios fell between 47 and 56%. The mean MSP for one clean chip scenario was $94.03/dry Mg, while the mean MSPs for two dirty chip scenarios were $74.79/dry Mg and $75.93/dry Mg. NPV results were most sensitive to forest biomass feedstock harvesting production levels, transportation distances, and delivered prices, followed by diesel fuel consumption for in-wood harvest and diesel fuel price.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1739 - 1754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reports results from a stochastic techno-economic analysis (TEA) model that assessed the financial feasibility of forest biomass harvest for low-carbon bioenergy feedstocks in the hardwood region of the Northeast United States. It analyzed three 24-year scenarios based on primary data collected from the mixed product harvest with whole tree harvesting systems that primarily produce clean chips, dirty chips, or pulpwood and dirty chips. Using a joint product costing approach, proportional costs of shared processes were allocated to different products on a mass basis. Uncertainty associated with key stochastic variables was incorporated into the model to generate net present values (NPV), benefit–cost ratios (BCR), and minimum selling prices (MSP) via Monte Carlo simulation. The clean chip scenario produced an NPV of $1.36 million and a BCR of 1.03, while the pulpwood scenario’s NPV and BCR ($0.06 million and 1.02) were lower, and the dirty chip scenario generated negative NPV (− $0.02 million) and a BCR of 0.99. The probabilities of achieving positive NPVs for all three scenarios fell between 47 and 56%. The mean MSP for one clean chip scenario was $94.03/dry Mg, while the mean MSPs for two dirty chip scenarios were $74.79/dry Mg and $75.93/dry Mg. NPV results were most sensitive to forest biomass feedstock harvesting production levels, transportation distances, and delivered prices, followed by diesel fuel consumption for in-wood harvest and diesel fuel price.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林生物质原料供应链的随机技术经济分析:生物能源应用中的清洁和肮脏木片
本研究报告了一个随机技术经济分析(TEA)模型的结果,该模型评估了在美国东北部硬木地区采伐森林生物质作为低碳生物能源原料的经济可行性。该模型根据从混合产品采伐中收集的原始数据,分析了三种为期 24 年的情景,即主要生产清洁木片、脏木片或纸浆材和脏木片的整树采伐系统。采用联合产品成本计算法,将共享流程的比例成本按质量分配给不同产品。与关键随机变量相关的不确定性被纳入模型,通过蒙特卡罗模拟生成净现值 (NPV)、效益成本比 (BCR) 和最低销售价格 (MSP)。清洁木片方案产生了 136 万美元的净现值和 1.03 的 BCR,而纸浆材方案的净现值和 BCR(6 万美元和 1.02)较低,肮脏木片方案产生了负净现值(-0.2 万美元)和 0.99 的 BCR。所有三种方案实现正净现值的概率介于 47% 和 56% 之间。一种清洁木片方案的平均 MSP 为 94.03 美元/干 Mg,而两种不清洁木片方案的平均 MSP 分别为 74.79 美元/干 Mg 和 75.93 美元/干 Mg。净现值结果对森林生物质原料采伐生产水平、运输距离和交货价格最为敏感,其次是林内采伐的柴油消耗量和柴油价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
期刊最新文献
Third-Generation L-Lactic Acid Biorefinery Approaches: Exploring the Viability of Macroalgae Detritus Microalga Growth-Promoting Bacteria as Strategy to Improve CO2 Removal from Biogas Micro-Raman Spectroscopy Explains the Population-Scale Heterogeneity in Lipid Profile in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Cultivated Under Single-Stage and Two-Stage Salt Stress Exergy Analysis of Integrated Methanol and Dimethyl-Ether Co-production Towards Net Zero Waste Emission Biomass Valorization for Bioenergy Production: Current Techniques, Challenges, and Pathways to Solutions for Sustainable Bioeconomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1